Thinking about that seriously during the current Georgia-Baylor match in the Sugar Bowl.
There has already been--1st quarter--several opportunities to grab either money line at better than +100, within minutes, so if the wagers were balanced, obviously, you could be looking at guaranteed profit.
Historically, my picks have been solid but I constantly run into money management problems.
I'm trying to fix that by doing things such as hedging, lately, as I've had a number of parlays with a final match needed where the other side comeback, at a smaller price, would guarantee no loss on the selection--or a guaranteed profit--but this has had mixed results; I think it is 5 cases of doing such with only one time not regretting the secondary investment (i.e. my original choice was goal).
The past couple of years it has become apparent to me that live, in-game betting could be a goldmine, if I would have the discipline not to bet-b-bet-bet so much pre-flop. My stakes are currently entertainment-level so it is what it is, but anybody who is truly in this to make money--'professional' or otherwise--has to take the live-betting route, imo.
Argument against would be the cases where you figure your selection is gold and if you wait you will have lost the opportunity, but I find a number of leans where certain questions linger as to how the team is going to look in that particular game, with these current Bowl games being a prime example.
Just wondering what success people have had with the flip-flop guaranteed live thingee. Perhaps such an option appears less frequently than I imagine but I have not been as aggressive in the live markets as I suspect I should be.
There has already been--1st quarter--several opportunities to grab either money line at better than +100, within minutes, so if the wagers were balanced, obviously, you could be looking at guaranteed profit.
Historically, my picks have been solid but I constantly run into money management problems.
I'm trying to fix that by doing things such as hedging, lately, as I've had a number of parlays with a final match needed where the other side comeback, at a smaller price, would guarantee no loss on the selection--or a guaranteed profit--but this has had mixed results; I think it is 5 cases of doing such with only one time not regretting the secondary investment (i.e. my original choice was goal).
The past couple of years it has become apparent to me that live, in-game betting could be a goldmine, if I would have the discipline not to bet-b-bet-bet so much pre-flop. My stakes are currently entertainment-level so it is what it is, but anybody who is truly in this to make money--'professional' or otherwise--has to take the live-betting route, imo.
Argument against would be the cases where you figure your selection is gold and if you wait you will have lost the opportunity, but I find a number of leans where certain questions linger as to how the team is going to look in that particular game, with these current Bowl games being a prime example.
Just wondering what success people have had with the flip-flop guaranteed live thingee. Perhaps such an option appears less frequently than I imagine but I have not been as aggressive in the live markets as I suspect I should be.
