Who the hell would lay 14 in the Super Bowl???

Nickelback

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,361
0
0
Southwest
I would :D

Spent a lot of time looking things over and trying to rationalize the game. I think 14 is considered a "safe" number by Vegas now that it has been adjusted as it is probably assumed that it is just as likely that the Rams blow out the Pats as it is that the Pats somehow make a game of it or even end up winning the game.

My main reason for taking the Rams is the fact that I do not feel the Pats' offense can keep up. . . yes, they scored 24 points against the Steelers, but their offense was basically shut down the second half and it was the Steelers that couldn't get things done on the offensive side of the football.

The Pats have relied on several lucky events (turnovers, official decisions) to hang around their games as of late and come up on the winning end, but I can't see it continuing against a sound offensive machine. To win and/or cover, the Pats will have to score right along with the Rams and throw out their conservative style of attack at the very beginning instead of relying on breaks to stay in the game until the 4th quarter. I can see them falling behind by two touchdowns before determining they must take chances and end up digging an even larger hole than they started with when playing conservative on the offensive side.

Another consideration is a backdoor cover which has been infamous this year as always and I'm sure is on everyone's mind when considering this spread. I believe the Rams will not let up on offense even in the 4th quarter with 5 minutes to go in the game and up by 13. This is the last game of the season and it has already been mentioned in the past how Warner and CO. abosolutely HATE coming out of games even when the outcome is no longer in doubt.

In the end, I feel the Rams will take chances early and often without ever letting up on the offensive side of the football while the Pats try to send the game into the 4th quarter still being in contention . . . this conservative style will kill them in the end and shouldn't help them score points against a Ram defense that is actually very decent.

If the Pats had the X factor like McNabb or a mobile QB, I could see their defense being vulernable. . . but not against the Pat's offensive unit and its impossible for me or anybody to determine if any breaks will go in favor of one team or the other. I'll go with what I can cap and take the Rams laying 14.
 

Red Raider

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 27, 2001
1,079
0
0
58
Phoenix, AZ
Dang Nickel, You had me worried for a second. Nice write up and I think your right on. The fact the NEw England is even in the Superbowl tells me that the AFC wasn't very good this year. I like the Rams big.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,495
256
83
Victory Lane
Nickel

Yeh the pats offense has been kind of anemic last three games. And remember during the season they are capable of putting up 40 points. Could this be the day they do and will


oh shit !

Scott


Get yourself in a position to win, then pull the trigger !
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top