Wicked witch of the left.

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,190
348
83
71
WNY
https://trendingpolitics.com/pelosi...us-relief-for-americans/?utm_source=economics


The reason why Democrats get by with treating the American people like second- and third-class citizens is that they are allowed to do so through via purposeful misreporting and outright lies occurring daily by the ?mainstream media.?

If our press was an honest broker and reported truthfully like our founders envisioned a free press would do, Democrats would be lucky to pull 20 percent support from voters and would very likely have died off long ago like the Whig and the Bull Moose parties.

Case in point: The way the Washington-centric media lets multi-millionaire House Speaker Nancy Pelosi get away with holding the American people in contempt by blocking legislation aimed at providing additional COVID-19 financial relief.

For months, Pelosi has been able to claim the House ?passed new coronavirus relief months ago,? but the mean, ol? nasty Republicans and that ogre, President Trump, ?refuse to sign on.?

What Pelosi isn?t telling Americans ? and what the garbage media refuses to tell Americans ? is that her party?s bill contains some COVID-19 relief as well as a laundry list of left-wing policy objectives including hundreds of billions for bankrupt blue cities that were bankrupt, due to crappy policies, long before the pandemic, as well as taking mail-in voting and ballot harvesting (which is legalized vote theft) nationwide.

Trump and Republicans, meanwhile, have been pushing a clean relief bill ? that is, one that only provides coronavirus economic relief, which is what Pelosi claims she wants but refuses to offer or agree to, making her, not Trump or the GOP, the impediment to tens of millions of ordinary folks getting new relief money.

Again, she?s interested in giving Americans hurting economically new relief checks only if she gets the other laundry list of Democrat priorities like bailing out blue states and cities for decades of bad fiscal management; rewarding left-wing teachers unions; and hijacking every election into the next millennia.
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
104,477
1,190
113
69
home
Edit: I don't get involved with this crap. Sorry about that.


 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
27,490
958
113
49
Earth
www.ffrf.org
Oh, the irony. Using a source known for extreme bias to explain how the MSM is full of extreme bias.

[h=1]Trending Politics[/h][FONT=&quot]


<amp-ad width="300" height="250" layout="fixed" type="doubleclick" data-slot="/124067137/mediabiasfactcheck300x250FL_4"></amp-ad><amp-ad width="300" height="250" layout="fixed" type="doubleclick" data-slot="/124067137/mediabiasfactcheck300x250FL_5"></amp-ad><header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=2]
right011.png
MBFCMixed.png
[/h]
[h=2]QUESTIONABLE SOURCE[/h]</header>A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
<amp-auto-ads type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910"></amp-auto-ads><amp-ad width="100vw" height="320" type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-auto-format="rspv" data-full-width="">
</amp-ad>


  • Overall, we rate Trending Politics Right Biased and Questionable based on poor sourcing, promotion of propaganda, and conspiracy theories as well as several failed fact checks.

[h=3]Detailed Report[/h]Reasoning: Extreme Right, Poor Sourcing, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
History
Founded in 2019, Trending Politics is hyper-partisan conservative news and opinion website. They fully disclose their bias on the about page as follows: ?We provide conservative commentary on the news stories of the day. Studies have shown that 90%+ of the stories about President Trump is negative, so we like to bring the other side of the story to you. With that being said, we aren?t shy to admit we?re biased. The majority of our articles will have a good amount of Pro-Trump opinion weaved into it.?
[/FONT]
 

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,190
348
83
71
WNY
Oh, the irony. Using a source known for extreme bias to explain how the MSM is full of extreme bias.

[h=1]Trending Politics[/h][FONT=&quot]


<amp-ad width="300" height="250" layout="fixed" type="doubleclick" data-slot="/124067137/mediabiasfactcheck300x250FL_4"></amp-ad><amp-ad width="300" height="250" layout="fixed" type="doubleclick" data-slot="/124067137/mediabiasfactcheck300x250FL_5"></amp-ad><header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=2]
right011.png
MBFCMixed.png
[/h]
[h=2]QUESTIONABLE SOURCE[/h]</header>A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
<amp-auto-ads type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910"></amp-auto-ads><amp-ad width="100vw" height="320" type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-auto-format="rspv" data-full-width="">
</amp-ad>


  • Overall, we rate Trending Politics Right Biased and Questionable based on poor sourcing, promotion of propaganda, and conspiracy theories as well as several failed fact checks.

[h=3]Detailed Report[/h]Reasoning: Extreme Right, Poor Sourcing, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
History
Founded in 2019, Trending Politics is hyper-partisan conservative news and opinion website. They fully disclose their bias on the about page as follows: ?We provide conservative commentary on the news stories of the day. Studies have shown that 90%+ of the stories about President Trump is negative, so we like to bring the other side of the story to you. With that being said, we aren?t shy to admit we?re biased. The majority of our articles will have a good amount of Pro-Trump opinion weaved into it.?
[/FONT]

SAYS WHO????

The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst."[3] The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[5] Alexandra Kitty, in a 2018 book on journalism, described MBFC as an apparent "amateur/civic outfit" and wrote that its founder's only qualification was a degree in communications.[4]

The site has been used by researchers at the University of Michigan to create a tool called the "Iffy Quotient", which draws data from Media Bias/Fact Check and NewsWhip to track the prevalence of "fake news" and questionable sources on social media.[6][7] The site was also used by a research group at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in initial training of an AI to fact check and detect the bias on a website.[8][9]

See also: Whatshisnuts is full of shit.
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
27,490
958
113
49
Earth
www.ffrf.org
SAYS WHO????

The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst."[3] The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[5] Alexandra Kitty, in a 2018 book on journalism, described MBFC as an apparent "amateur/civic outfit" and wrote that its founder's only qualification was a degree in communications.[4]

The site has been used by researchers at the University of Michigan to create a tool called the "Iffy Quotient", which draws data from Media Bias/Fact Check and NewsWhip to track the prevalence of "fake news" and questionable sources on social media.[6][7] The site was also used by a research group at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in initial training of an AI to fact check and detect the bias on a website.[8][9]

See also: Whatshisnuts is full of shit.

Read the fucking article you posted! It aligns PERFECTLY with what the Media Bias rating site accuses them of! Holy shit, you are really dense. It's misinformation wrapped in Republican propaganda. Wow, you're clueless.
 

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,190
348
83
71
WNY
Read the fucking article you posted! It aligns PERFECTLY with what the Media Bias rating site accuses them of! Holy shit, you are really dense. It's misinformation wrapped in Republican propaganda. Wow, you're clueless.


Drag out your questionable arrow meter on yourself.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top