wtf is with this bengals-Seahawks line movement?

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
5,649
25
48
Toronto
cinci opened -3 at a small +
+104, I think it was.
Next day +108 and then +110.
I now see it -1.5 -117.
Actually, only up to +113 for the -3.

Despite the bye teams' misleading (IMO) struggles this year, this game looks solid to me. Better O, D, and should be more motivated. I know that Qwest Field provides a solid home advantage but this looks totally contrarian.

Is this one of those sharps anti-movement plays and is that story even true?
Probably worth another thread, altogether.
Maybe, maybe not.

Go bengals, regardless.
I'm in and will be in too deep by kickoff.


<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/I2L40Ze6Ff4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Last edited:

Hindsite

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2002
748
0
0
51
cinci opened -3 at a small +
+104, I think it was.
Next day +108 and then +110.
I now see it -1.5 -117.
Actually, only up to +113 for the -3.

Despite the bye teams' misleading (IMO) struggles this year, this game looks solid to me. Better O, D, and should be more motivated. I know that Qwest Field provides a solid home advantage but this looks totally contrarian.

Is this one of those sharps anti-movement plays and is that story even true?
Probably worth another thread, altogether.
Maybe, maybe not.

Go bengals, regardless.
I'm in and will be in too deep by kickoff.


<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/I2L40Ze6Ff4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I would say it's related to the QB situation.. Appears Whitehurst might start...
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top