Lots of ways to play this:
1. Double chance (aus / draw) -170
2. To qualify , seeing as high as +122 down to +109
3. Match result - has wiggled between +210 - +240 currently seeing some +225’s
Then the most interesting one i’ve found - courtesy of betways (not sure of affiliation but i pick up my cash just down the road at the Nugget in AC.
Be that as it may, they’ve got a +0.25 handicapp (FT of course) that i took earlier at -122
It’s since run to -136, I don’t view that as a good or bad thing in terms of money flow or outcome, BUT it squeezes the marginal value.
Already have that in :
AUS women +0.25 -122 15x
BUT it does beg the question - why would anyone bet the “double chance” at closer to a 60% return, when this is essentially the same position?
Anytime if I have to ask, i don’t like the answer or find out why when the bets striking paper (TP / Charmin) before i can put the game on.
But if anyone can indulge me?
1. Double chance (aus / draw) -170
2. To qualify , seeing as high as +122 down to +109
3. Match result - has wiggled between +210 - +240 currently seeing some +225’s
Then the most interesting one i’ve found - courtesy of betways (not sure of affiliation but i pick up my cash just down the road at the Nugget in AC.
Be that as it may, they’ve got a +0.25 handicapp (FT of course) that i took earlier at -122
It’s since run to -136, I don’t view that as a good or bad thing in terms of money flow or outcome, BUT it squeezes the marginal value.
Already have that in :
AUS women +0.25 -122 15x
BUT it does beg the question - why would anyone bet the “double chance” at closer to a 60% return, when this is essentially the same position?
Anytime if I have to ask, i don’t like the answer or find out why when the bets striking paper (TP / Charmin) before i can put the game on.
But if anyone can indulge me?
Last edited: