52 shot this weekend

kcwolf

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 1, 2000
7,224
21
0
Iowa City
You're right about one thing Weezy...

It was a carnival.



hedge-fund-assets_2.png


george-bush-sour.jpg

"Mr. President... How does your administration plan to stop
this meltdown of the U.S. economy? ......Mr. President?
......Mr. President?"

Trench

Remember when a US Senator with this (R) behind his name said: Us Republicans are spending money like drunken sailors?

Thought I might throw up another chart. :SIB


Natl_Debt_Chart.jpg
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,465
134
63
Bowling Green Ky
Gee for some reason I don't see any links to source of these graphs--I wonder why-- :)

Let me help--in order posted

http://publicradio.org

http://paul.kedrosky.com

http://2.bp.blogspot.com

:0008

--and while on issue of graphs I'd need some assistance--we were told that website recovery.gov would show us were all these stimulus $$ were spent.

Can you tell me how I can navigate this graph on their site on stimulus bill to find out where the 1/3 of stimulus called "entitlements" was spent and how the hell it got anything to do growing economy???

http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/home.aspx
 
Last edited:

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Wayne, I think you know those numbers from K.C.'s chart are at least representative of our debt numbers. There are plenty of charts from plenty of sources that show this same pattern. And, I think you know that. The chart does note where the numbers came from, and if you dispute the chart, perhaps you can show something different, or check the numbers from the sources ALREADY CITED in the chart.

Do you disagree that our debt went up dramatically under Reagan and then Bush 1? Do you disagree that our debt went down dramatically under Clinton? Do you disagree that it EXPLODED under Bush 2?

We know where it's going under Obama, and some of us are publicly concerned about that. But since you seem to care so much about arguing the point, do you have any numbers to dispute them? If not, change the subject, eh?
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
57
In the shadows
I think DTB was bragging about his prowess with an AR-15 while shooting prairie dogs last weekend... :shrug:

Trench

Model R-15? VTR? Predator Carbine CS

r-15vtrpredatorcarbine-cs-prod.ashx


Overview:
We created an unrivaled combination of precision accuracy, blazing-fast follow-ups and hunt-specific features. The new R-15 VTR? modular repeating rifle was born of the most advanced design aspects of AR-15-style rifles available today with a strong emphasis on optimizing form and functionality for the modern predator aficionado. The results are astounding ? with very serious implications for every coyote, fox or bobcat that crosses its path.
For peak accuracy, the R-15?s 0.680" OD barrel is precision-crafted from ChroMoly steel. It?s free-floated within the machined-aluminum fore-end tube and given a recessed hunting crown to ensure gasses escape evenly around the bullet for the ultimate in shot-to-shot consistency. Six longitudinal flutes forward of the gas block promote rapid barrel cooling and increase rigidity while reducing weight, further contributing to this rifle?s ability to print tiny clusters at an incredible pace.
And our new hunting single-stage trigger design is as cleanbreaking as they come. Whether you choose the 223 Remington or 204 Ruger version, the semi-automatic gas action all but eliminates muzzle jump and recoil so your target remains in the crosshairs. And when it?s time to add optics, the receiver-length Picatinny rail makes it a rock-solid cinch.
Control comes naturally with the ergonomic pistol grip and lightweight overall design of the R-15. Its uppers and lowers are machined from aluminum forgings for featherweight durability, and the fore-end tube is drilled and tapped for accessory rails. This new family of firearms consists of three models. Each was designed with input from leading predator authorities and decked in the ultra-effective Advantage? MAX-1 HD? camouflage to blend with sage, open country and a multitude of hunting terrains. All come with five-round magazines and are compatible with all aftermarket AR-15 magazines and other accessories.
The R-15 VTR Predator Rifle has a 22" barrel with a fixed stock and pistol grip. At 7 3/4 lbs, it?s extremely stable ? the best choice for long shots. Our R-15 VTR Predator Carbine and R-15 Predator Carbine CS* (Collapsible Stock) handle like lightning with their 18" barrels and weigh a mere 6 3/4 lbs. ? perfect for high-speed hunting scenarios. The Predator Carbine CS features a telescoping stock with a fully adjustable length of pull for a custom fit.
Key Features:
New semi-automatic AR-15-style rifle developed with the predator hunter in mind
Free-floating button-rifled 0.680" Muzzle OD ChroMoly barrels with recessed hunting crown for superior accuracy
Fluted barrel design reduces weight and promotes rapid barrel cooling
Clean-breaking single-stage hunting trigger
Receiver-length Picatinny rail for adding optics
Ergonomic pistol grip
Fore-end tube drilled and tapped for accessory rails
Full Advantage? MAX-1 HD? coverage
Includes 5-round magazine
Legal for hunting in most states
Compatible with aftermarket AR-15 magazines
Lockable hard case included


She's purdy ! :toast:
 

kcwolf

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 1, 2000
7,224
21
0
Iowa City

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,465
134
63
Bowling Green Ky
Wayne, I think you know those numbers from K.C.'s chart are at least representative of our debt numbers. There are plenty of charts from plenty of sources that show this same pattern. And, I think you know that. The chart does note where the numbers came from, and if you dispute the chart, perhaps you can show something different, or check the numbers from the sources ALREADY CITED in the chart.

Do you disagree that our debt went up dramatically under Reagan and then Bush 1? Do you disagree that our debt went down dramatically under Clinton? Do you disagree that it EXPLODED under Bush 2?

We know where it's going under Obama, and some of us are publicly concerned about that. But since you seem to care so much about arguing the point, do you have any numbers to dispute them? If not, change the subject, eh?


Charts may be correct Chad--1st thing I do is look at source (especially if not listed) -and when they have little political animations in them -its a dead giveaway-you know they are from moonbat source--
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,465
134
63
Bowling Green Ky
My numbers come from GAO, I know it isn't as good as Charles Krauthammer :)142smilie ).

And congratulations on finding the url's, my first grade grandson can help you out if you are ever in a pinch.

you might have your grandson right click on your graph then click properties and tell you what url says.

--I'll read Krauthammer you contniue to follow your sources--I'll rant on taxes and spending--you hope for some more entitlements.

to each their own! :0008
 
Last edited:

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
Gee for some reason I don't see any links to source of these graphs--I wonder why-- :)

Let me help--in order posted

http://publicradio.org

http://paul.kedrosky.com
So Public Radio and Paul Kedrosky are "moonbat" sources in your warped mind? You, of all people, could learn something from Public Radio. And Paul Kedrosky's hosts a financial site. The chart I posted from his site is from an HFR Industry Report.

Calling those "moobat" sources is ironic coming from the guy who regularly posts gossipy right-wing drivel from Michelle Malkin and World Net Daily. :142smilie

Trench
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Charts may be correct Chad--1st thing I do is look at source (especially if not listed) -and when they have little political animations in them -its a dead giveaway-you know they are from moonbat source--

Charts "may" be correct? Ok, like I said, if you have any numbers to disprove them, go for it. You always want us to do that with your charts, right? Apparently, now, it's the little political animations that bother you? Let's see, how outlandish and moonbattish are those additions to the chart, just so we can see what bothers you...

They mention what political party was in charge during the years of the chart. They put the name Bush in there twice, showing what two presidents (along with Reagan) that oversaw the two big explosions of the debt of this country over the 232 years of our country.

Yeah, real moonbatty... :rolleyes:

What's really moonbatty is hearing conservatives NOW screaming about Obama and the debt, when there were very few peeps coming from those conservatives when the debt was exploding before. It's good to see that you might have to face the numbers of this chart, since I guess you haven't found any to dispute them on "The Google." Of course, it's easier to just dismiss/ignore them with a technicality that really isn't a technicality at all - just an avoidance of the issue.

Carry on...:0074
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,465
134
63
Bowling Green Ky
Charts "may" be correct? Ok, like I said, if you have any numbers to disprove them, go for it. You always want us to do that with your charts, right? Apparently, now, it's the little political animations that bother you? Let's see, how outlandish and moonbattish are those additions to the chart, just so we can see what bothers you...

They mention what political party was in charge during the years of the chart. They put the name Bush in there twice, showing what two presidents (along with Reagan) that oversaw the two big explosions of the debt of this country over the 232 years of our country.

Yeah, real moonbatty... :rolleyes:

What's really moonbatty is hearing conservatives NOW screaming about Obama and the debt, when there were very few peeps coming from those conservatives when the debt was exploding before. It's good to see that you might have to face the numbers of this chart, since I guess you haven't found any to dispute them on "The Google." Of course, it's easier to just dismiss/ignore them with a technicality that really isn't a technicality at all - just an avoidance of the issue.

Carry on...:0074

DUH
What part are failing to grasp-
-sheez-its in picture form :shrug:

ONE MORE TIME---

GR2009032100104.gif

SOURCE: CBO, White House Office of Management and Budget | The Washington Post - March 21, 2009
 

kcwolf

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 1, 2000
7,224
21
0
Iowa City
Republicans have always been great talking about the future and fear. I'm pleased your're still riding with the CBO.

;)
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top