All of you Jacklegs screaming about COVID
- Thread starter Skulnik
- Start date
-
- Tags
- bullshit kulnik is a fag
- Status
BOMBSHELL: Disposable blue face masks found to contain toxic, asbestos-like substance that destroys lungs
Tuesday, March 30, 2021 by: Ethan Huff
Tags: asbestos, badcancer, badhealth, badmedicine, badpollution, badscience, blue masks, cancer causes, children, face masks, gray masks, lung cancer, lung damage, masks, outbreak, pandemic, SNN200642, Toxic
Bypass censorship by sharing this link:
New
https://www.afinalwarning.com/507549.html
Copy URL
5,420
VIEWS
Image: BOMBSHELL: Disposable blue face masks found to contain toxic, asbestos-like substance that destroys lungs
(Natural News) Health Canada has issued a warning about blue and gray disposable face masks, which contain an asbestos-like substance associated with ?early pulmonary toxicity.?
The SNN200642 masks, which are made in China and sold and distributed by a Quebec-based company called M?tallifer, had been part of Canada?s public school reopening plan. Students were told that they needed to wear them in the classroom to prevent the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19).
Health Canada, however, discovered during a preliminary risk assessment that the masks contain microscopic graphene particles that, when inhaled, could cause severe lung damage.
?Graphene is a strong, very thin material that is used in fabrication, but it can be harmful to lungs when inhaled and can cause long-term health problems,? reported CBC News.
For a while now, some daycare educators had expressed suspicion about the masks, which were causing children to feel as though they were swallowing cat hair while wearing them. We now know that instead of cat hair, children were inhaling the equivalent of asbestos all day long.
?If you have this type of mask in stock, we ask that you stop distributing them and keep them in a safe place now,? the provincial government wrote in a directive, which was sent to the education, families, and higher education ministries of Canada.
Face masks are neither safe nor effective
As it turns out, the SNN200642 masks that were being used all across Canada in school classrooms had never been tested for safety or effectiveness. Patrick Baillargeon, who heads up purchasing for Quebec?s laboratory supplies, says that because of this, the masks never should have been used.
The risks associated with inhaling graphene particles is unacceptable, he added, and Canadians ? and everyone else, for that matter ? should immediately stop using the masks.
?We therefore ask all our customers to check if they have any in their possession,? Baillargeon wrote in a notice, further revealing that at the time of their acquisition and distribution, the blue and gray disposable face masks were not in compliance with government regulations.
Schools and other facilities adopted them due to fears surrounding the Chinese virus, but this rushed, reactionary response is now causing other problems in the form of lung damage.
?We are now verifying whether any of these particular masks remain in our schools and centres,? reads a letter sent by the Lester B. Pearson school board to the parents of all exposed children.
?Any unused masks will be returned to our storage depot while we await further directives from the government.?
Back in December, the Quebec government had distributed these toxic masks to more than 15,000 daycare centers throughout the province. None of the masks met safety standards and were later ordered to no longer be used.
Another similar style of disposable mask, known as MC9501, was likewise pulled from distribution throughout Canada after it was determined to be unsafe. As many as 31.1 million toxic masks from this line were distributed before the government realized that they are unfit for use.
?Shouldn?t all this stuff be tested BEFORE it even leaves the factory?? asked one CBC News commenter, expressing outrage over the government?s act now, think later approach to Wuhan flu mitigation.
Others called for heads to roll over the fiasco, as well as an immediate end to all face mask use as the coverings are both useless and harmful no matter what materials were used in their production.
?To force a child to wear a toxic face mask is child abuse,? one wrote. ?I hope lawsuits will follow.?
More coverage of the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) can be found at Pandemic.news.
Sources for this article include:
CBC.ca
NaturalNews.com
Tuesday, March 30, 2021 by: Ethan Huff
Tags: asbestos, badcancer, badhealth, badmedicine, badpollution, badscience, blue masks, cancer causes, children, face masks, gray masks, lung cancer, lung damage, masks, outbreak, pandemic, SNN200642, Toxic
Bypass censorship by sharing this link:
New
https://www.afinalwarning.com/507549.html
Copy URL
5,420
VIEWS
Image: BOMBSHELL: Disposable blue face masks found to contain toxic, asbestos-like substance that destroys lungs
(Natural News) Health Canada has issued a warning about blue and gray disposable face masks, which contain an asbestos-like substance associated with ?early pulmonary toxicity.?
The SNN200642 masks, which are made in China and sold and distributed by a Quebec-based company called M?tallifer, had been part of Canada?s public school reopening plan. Students were told that they needed to wear them in the classroom to prevent the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19).
Health Canada, however, discovered during a preliminary risk assessment that the masks contain microscopic graphene particles that, when inhaled, could cause severe lung damage.
?Graphene is a strong, very thin material that is used in fabrication, but it can be harmful to lungs when inhaled and can cause long-term health problems,? reported CBC News.
For a while now, some daycare educators had expressed suspicion about the masks, which were causing children to feel as though they were swallowing cat hair while wearing them. We now know that instead of cat hair, children were inhaling the equivalent of asbestos all day long.
?If you have this type of mask in stock, we ask that you stop distributing them and keep them in a safe place now,? the provincial government wrote in a directive, which was sent to the education, families, and higher education ministries of Canada.
Face masks are neither safe nor effective
As it turns out, the SNN200642 masks that were being used all across Canada in school classrooms had never been tested for safety or effectiveness. Patrick Baillargeon, who heads up purchasing for Quebec?s laboratory supplies, says that because of this, the masks never should have been used.
The risks associated with inhaling graphene particles is unacceptable, he added, and Canadians ? and everyone else, for that matter ? should immediately stop using the masks.
?We therefore ask all our customers to check if they have any in their possession,? Baillargeon wrote in a notice, further revealing that at the time of their acquisition and distribution, the blue and gray disposable face masks were not in compliance with government regulations.
Schools and other facilities adopted them due to fears surrounding the Chinese virus, but this rushed, reactionary response is now causing other problems in the form of lung damage.
?We are now verifying whether any of these particular masks remain in our schools and centres,? reads a letter sent by the Lester B. Pearson school board to the parents of all exposed children.
?Any unused masks will be returned to our storage depot while we await further directives from the government.?
Back in December, the Quebec government had distributed these toxic masks to more than 15,000 daycare centers throughout the province. None of the masks met safety standards and were later ordered to no longer be used.
Another similar style of disposable mask, known as MC9501, was likewise pulled from distribution throughout Canada after it was determined to be unsafe. As many as 31.1 million toxic masks from this line were distributed before the government realized that they are unfit for use.
?Shouldn?t all this stuff be tested BEFORE it even leaves the factory?? asked one CBC News commenter, expressing outrage over the government?s act now, think later approach to Wuhan flu mitigation.
Others called for heads to roll over the fiasco, as well as an immediate end to all face mask use as the coverings are both useless and harmful no matter what materials were used in their production.
?To force a child to wear a toxic face mask is child abuse,? one wrote. ?I hope lawsuits will follow.?
More coverage of the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) can be found at Pandemic.news.
Sources for this article include:
CBC.ca
NaturalNews.com
:mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">JUST IN - Berlin suspends AstraZeneca vaccinations for under 60 years olds as the German Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) reports 31 suspected cases of brain thrombosis and nine deaths after vaccination nationwide.</p>— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) <a href="https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1376871228288425984?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 30, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
:0003
:0003
I just wonder how many people get cancer in the next couple years? What a way to control the population. I?m a little skeptical when the government that I don?t trust is forcing everyone to get the vaccine? Hmmmmmm
I?ll take my chances, I got covid and survived just fine
I?ll take my chances, I got covid and survived just fine
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">USA 🇺🇲 A man on megaphone, trying to spread the message, imploring people to Question the narrative, asking are people brainwashed. Literally on cue he is attacked by a furious Covidiot. You'd have to say mission complete 👊 <a href="https://t.co/iH04Qkq0aQ">pic.twitter.com/iH04Qkq0aQ</a></p>— ✖️RISE✖️? (@wemustrisenow) <a href="https://twitter.com/wemustrisenow/status/1377197049444069376?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 31, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Scarborough blasts Americans skeptical of vaccine passports as opposing the teachings of Jesus Christ: "The selfishness is incredible. The stupidity is incredible ? If you still believe in God, maybe get on your knees and pray ... You?re going out of your way to kill people.? <a href="https://t.co/YCAQ70ca31">pic.twitter.com/YCAQ70ca31</a></p>— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) <a href="https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1376843287701635075?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 30, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Right, because My Body, My Choice, I think I've heard that somewhere.
opcorn2
Except it's different, right? Because you get vaccinated for the sake of the whole of society, not just for yourself. We'll never get out of this fucking mess with people like you walking around thinking you're smarter than science.....but, of course, you'll be the first ones to bitch about things not getting back to normal fast enough.
Slow the spread was a TWO WEEK PLAN, we should've been protecting the people with compromised immune systems and went with HERD IMMUNITY during the summer months, that's what I read. Please don't talk about SCIENCE, Tony Fauci was all over the place with masks, if you don't believe me, GOOGLE it.
It was flatten the curve. That was to keep infection rates from peaking to a point that our healthcare workers could no longer support. It was to be ongoing. Since we weren't willing to do a true 2 week shutdown, that was the best advice they had.
As for Fauci, he's just Trump's scapegoat. Fauci had to learn about the virus and spread the best advice possible as information on the fly....all while working under a complete dipshit who would undermine him all along the way. Part of the fear was that if he didn't keep his job, Trump would hire some dipshit like Eric Trump to be the voice of sanity.
Nobody had the answers right from the get go so to say he was "all over the place" is asinine. He was working off the best info he was getting from our own CDC. We were all taking crazy precautions early on because we didn't know exactly how the virus was being transmitted.
China has had 10,000 cases in the last 13 months. The US has 7xs that number EVERY........FUCKING........DAY.
Maybe the Chinese shouldn't concern you so much?
:facepalm:
At least we are beating them at something!
I'm sure we have a few hundred spies over there who could refute the numbers if they were false.
But.......I understand. They're communists, and we have "freedom". Freedom to be arrogant idiots! How's that working for you?
:mj07:
You didn't address anything I responded with, so I take it you agree. :0008
The air travel ban from China was a typical short sighted Trump move. The horse was already out of the barn and should have banned all incoming international travel. This was another version of Trump setting up a peeing section inside the swimming pool. Incompetence personified.
- Status
