- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,182
- 362
- 83
- 74
Any problem with asking the exec's of each company to put 50% of their current net worth?
only w/them...:mj07:
Any problem with asking the exec's of each company to put 50% of their current net worth?
cool. give over 100 billion to aig and stick your nose to 15 bil to the big 3.
this is prob some really bad news for the short term.
now the dow futures are -311, wait till morning :scared
tomorrow is crash big fucking time. i sure hope not but....
the bright side... there are gonna be some good stock opportunities after the next few days/weeks. we're gonna tank for a bit more, right? right!All because of union concessions. And they're not really asking them to recede the current employees, they want to go after the retirees.
White Housed to give money??? Word is Bush does not want to end his term as Hoover/Bush.
I don't know why they pick on blue coller guys. Today it was stated union guys are 8% of cost of new car 10% when retires are included. Mr Wagner CEO of G M only made 16 million last 3 years. He's about 1% by himself. Supplies and retooling of plants is where the big cost are.
White Housed to give money??? Word is Bush does not want to end his term as Hoover/Bush.
I don't know why they pick on blue coller guys. Today it was stated union guys are 8% of cost of new car 10% when retires are included. Mr Wagner CEO of G M only made 16 million last 3 years. He's about 1% by himself. Supplies and retooling of plants is where the big cost are.
You're really a glass half full kind of guy, Jack
Interesting breakdown there.....dont you think we're over focusing on the union costs here.....one big difference between GM/Chrysler and the rest of the worlds automakers are the built in legacy costs....yes, that means union retirees health benefits are still being paid for by the company, but its the same for management benefits post retirements as well.
Its not just Union pay that drives up the Big 3 costs....of course that gets lost in shuffle as everyone loves to hate on the Union as the root of all evil......seems to me the R's fighting this would rather break the union as opposed to trying to fix this mess.
I am a reluctant supporter of the bailout....if we can give Wall St 700 Billion (which, by the way is a lot more than experts figured Wall St really needed) with little strings attatched so they can pay out golden parachutes, it seems a little backwards that we cant find some short term cash--on a loan basis--to help out large companies that employ blue collar workers and also help keep afloat the smaller suppliers up and down the automotive food chain.
This, however, is what is wrong with our government....it works for the fat cats in suits and not for the men and women toiling in the middle class.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.