Barack Hussien Obama
- Thread starter Jaxx
- Start date
Right, and your numbers prove it.
Obama's total income over the past 12 years is considerably less than Romney's for last year alone.
And Obama has a day job.
Romney is unemployed. Nobody knows how much he has hidden in the Cayman Islands.
:facepalm:
The point is Obama can do nothing right. He was the president that said this country can not succeed without economic growth from the bottom up and not just the top down. He ran on this platform. He was the president that was going to take on the great inequality from the top and the bottom. Guess what the fuck point is the exact opposite is taking place at a faster pace than ever. Under Obama the net worth of the richest 7% of Americans has increased by 25% while the net worth of everyone else in America declined by 4% on average. The poverty rate has increased from 12% in 2008 to 16% today.
Damn man. The man and the government fuck up anything they touch. And now they are going to reform the healthcare system. Were fucked.
Last edited:
In a poll released last year by ABC News and the Washington Post, 84 percent of Republicans said they approved of George W. Bush, compared to 45 percent of independents and just 25 percent of Democrats. This includes self-described conservatives (69 percent approval), whites (55 percent approval), and voters with incomes of over $100,000 (55 percent). The poll doesn?t give a detailed look at issue-based approval, but my sense is that you?d see similar numbers for his handling of the economy, and his decision to invade Iraq.
So what, if anything, does this mean for GOP prospects? Pace the popular prognosis, Republicans don?t need to change to win elections. The 2016 election will turn on Obama?s standing and the state of the economy. If conditions are poor, and Republicans field a credible candidate, then there?s a good chance they win the White House.
If Bush esteem is relevant, it?s for Republican governance. And there, we have reason for worry. With few exceptions, the Bush presidency was a parade of failures, from poor economic stewardship to disastrous wars and a contempt for the basic functions of government. And a Republican Party that looks at this and sees success is a Republican Party that isn?t prepared?or qualified?to hold the reins of power.
...................................................................................................
:facepalm:
So what, if anything, does this mean for GOP prospects? Pace the popular prognosis, Republicans don?t need to change to win elections. The 2016 election will turn on Obama?s standing and the state of the economy. If conditions are poor, and Republicans field a credible candidate, then there?s a good chance they win the White House.
If Bush esteem is relevant, it?s for Republican governance. And there, we have reason for worry. With few exceptions, the Bush presidency was a parade of failures, from poor economic stewardship to disastrous wars and a contempt for the basic functions of government. And a Republican Party that looks at this and sees success is a Republican Party that isn?t prepared?or qualified?to hold the reins of power.
...................................................................................................
:facepalm:
Again, I'm very sorry for your situation. . . . things are going so well for most of us.
:s5:
Still at it, Jerkoff? I gave you a list of 60,000 open jobs in Florida. Found one yet?
