Confused.
Is that...
Kings and under
Clippers and over clippers parlay
1h lakers and 1h over lakers parlay
1h over lakers and 2h under lakers
Hoping I covered it?!?
Not easy to parse!!
Confused.
Is that...
Kings and under
Clippers and over clippers parlay
1h lakers and 1h over lakers parlay
1h over lakers and 2h under lakers
Hoping I covered it?!?
Not easy to parse!!
Parse ????
Friggen Parse.
Outstanding.
Well played Sir! :0074
This No.Star kid has made a strident entry into our friendly confines....
Now keep it up ...:toast:
Missed the Lakers Over in first half by a point.
Won the other 3: Sac Under, Clipper Over & Lakers Under second half.
Parlays went 1-2
My favorite category Sac Under won and the parlay with it won too. It gets to remain my favorite category.
Good day overall.
Northern Star
Do you need a definition?? I was not the only confused Mr. 285 posts!! Continue on with your cozy,friendly confines.
No I don't need a definition, but thanks for the offer... Clearly giving you props for using a word I would wager has never been seen on this site before.
Am I a Smartass? Guilty as charged....a product of my environs....its a No. Jersey thing.
No harm intended, although if we were on the ice together at some point, we probably would drop the gloves.
Good luck to you sir...
Hey, was that "Mr. 285 posts" a shot???? Yes, I think it was :mj07::mj07::mj07:
I lost mostly bc I played lakers 1h and lakers full game. I was confused with your wording. I got the totals but didn?t know if lakers was a play or not so played them whole game and 1h too. Wording made it seems like play was lakers too.
Keep them coming. We appreciate the plays.
Sorry for the confusion I was in a rush and even missed the first couple series of the Vikings game.
For future reference. In the NBA I will only post totals. I will also post parlays to go with the totals. The program often times shows a high correlation between the total and a certain team covering. Like the Sacramento game. Last 24 times it had come up the record was 16 under and 4 overs. Of those 16 unders the favorite had covered 14 times. That is definitely a very strong correlation. Not all of them are that strong.
Do you need a definition?? I was not the only confused Mr. 285 posts!! Continue on with your cozy,friendly confines.
No I don't need a definition, but thanks for the offer... Clearly giving you props for using a word I would wager has never been seen on this site before.
Am I a Smartass? Guilty as charged....a product of my environs....its a No. Jersey thing.
No harm intended, although if we were on the ice together at some point, we probably would drop the gloves.
Good luck to you sir...
Hey, was that "Mr. 285 posts" a shot???? Yes, I think it was :mj07::mj07::mj07:
All good 53....Probably wouldn't want to drop the gloves with you....I am from wine and cheese country:mj07: (Thanks Sam Cassell- FSU...classic one liner). We just a little slow down South. I will try to do better to comprende!!
MN Over 110 first half
As Always Good Luck
Northern Star
Great call! Appreciate your hard work and your sharing your plays.
Great call! Appreciate your hard work and your sharing your plays.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.