http://www.zombietime.com/prairie_fire/
""Ayers was not simply protesting ?against? the Vietnam War. Firstly, he wasn?t against war in principle, he was agitating for the victory of the communist forces in Vietnam. In other words: He wasn?t against the war, he was against our side in the war. This is spelled out in great detail in Prairie Fire. Secondly, and more significantly, the Vietnam War was only one of many issues cited by the Weather Undergound as the justifications for their violent acts. As you will see below, in various quotes from Prairie Fire and in their own list of their violent actions (and in additional impartial documentary links), Ayers and the Weather Underground enumerated dozens of different grievances as the rationales for their bombings ? their overarching goal being to inspire a violent mass uprising against the United States government in order to establish a communist ?dictatorship of the proletariat,? in Ayers? own words.
Ayers and his co-authors freely brag about their bombings and other violent and illegal acts, and even provide a detailed list, most likely typed up by Ayers himself, of the crimes they had committed up to that point. Ayers? list, scanned directly from Prairie Fire, is shown below. He may have escaped conviction due to a legal technicality (the prosecutors failed to get a warrant during some of their surveillance of the Weather Underground), but this in no way means that Ayers was factually inncoent of the crimes. As has been widely reported, after the case against him was dropped, Ayers decribed himself as ?guilty as hell, free as a bird.?
Just because Ayers tries to appear respectable now doesn?t mean that he wasn?t a violent revolutionary in the past. In fact, as the text of Prairie Fire shows, Ayers was one of the most extreme extremists in American political history. And as the links given as the end of this essay prove, Ayers is just as politically radical now as he was back then. He has never renounced the political views he professed in the 1960s and 1970s. The only difference is that now he no longer commits violence to achieve his goals. After his stint as the leader of the Weather Underground, he shifted to a different tactic: to spread his ideology under the aegis of academia. But the goal remains the same: to turn America into a communist nation. Ayers? contemporary writings contain many of the same ideas (and even the same phrases) found in Prairie Fire, just toned down to make them more palatable in polite society.""
this jackass wasn`t against the war...he was against "our side" in the war...
"dedicated to sirhan sirhan"... WHERE THE HELL ARE THE KENNEDYS ON THIS?...
and some 1500 college professors just signed a petition for this jerk.....
must be nice to be one of those idealistic, fearless revolutionaries...with tenure and a great pension.....
this is what we`re heading for,guys...the idea is to radicalize the next generation. .....try and win for the far left some measure of control over education(mission accomplished).....
radicalize the teachers by getting them to emulate the "annenberg project's" activities in chicago. ...
killing is good clean fun, and bock`s buddy ayers isn't the least bit sorry he tried it.... but,since it didn`t work,you have to try another tactic.....
eventually, if it works, his bunky walks into power on votes, just like ortega did in nicaragua. ....
they`re on plan "b"....... and it`s working with the help of academia,hollywood,the media,and the indoctrinated lemmings...
tens, if not hundreds of millions killed by communism in one form or the other......yet all you hear ......crickets(cheep..cheep...cheep)
god help this country...liberalism is indeed a disease..
""Ayers was not simply protesting ?against? the Vietnam War. Firstly, he wasn?t against war in principle, he was agitating for the victory of the communist forces in Vietnam. In other words: He wasn?t against the war, he was against our side in the war. This is spelled out in great detail in Prairie Fire. Secondly, and more significantly, the Vietnam War was only one of many issues cited by the Weather Undergound as the justifications for their violent acts. As you will see below, in various quotes from Prairie Fire and in their own list of their violent actions (and in additional impartial documentary links), Ayers and the Weather Underground enumerated dozens of different grievances as the rationales for their bombings ? their overarching goal being to inspire a violent mass uprising against the United States government in order to establish a communist ?dictatorship of the proletariat,? in Ayers? own words.
Ayers and his co-authors freely brag about their bombings and other violent and illegal acts, and even provide a detailed list, most likely typed up by Ayers himself, of the crimes they had committed up to that point. Ayers? list, scanned directly from Prairie Fire, is shown below. He may have escaped conviction due to a legal technicality (the prosecutors failed to get a warrant during some of their surveillance of the Weather Underground), but this in no way means that Ayers was factually inncoent of the crimes. As has been widely reported, after the case against him was dropped, Ayers decribed himself as ?guilty as hell, free as a bird.?
Just because Ayers tries to appear respectable now doesn?t mean that he wasn?t a violent revolutionary in the past. In fact, as the text of Prairie Fire shows, Ayers was one of the most extreme extremists in American political history. And as the links given as the end of this essay prove, Ayers is just as politically radical now as he was back then. He has never renounced the political views he professed in the 1960s and 1970s. The only difference is that now he no longer commits violence to achieve his goals. After his stint as the leader of the Weather Underground, he shifted to a different tactic: to spread his ideology under the aegis of academia. But the goal remains the same: to turn America into a communist nation. Ayers? contemporary writings contain many of the same ideas (and even the same phrases) found in Prairie Fire, just toned down to make them more palatable in polite society.""
this jackass wasn`t against the war...he was against "our side" in the war...
"dedicated to sirhan sirhan"... WHERE THE HELL ARE THE KENNEDYS ON THIS?...
and some 1500 college professors just signed a petition for this jerk.....
must be nice to be one of those idealistic, fearless revolutionaries...with tenure and a great pension.....
this is what we`re heading for,guys...the idea is to radicalize the next generation. .....try and win for the far left some measure of control over education(mission accomplished).....
radicalize the teachers by getting them to emulate the "annenberg project's" activities in chicago. ...
killing is good clean fun, and bock`s buddy ayers isn't the least bit sorry he tried it.... but,since it didn`t work,you have to try another tactic.....
eventually, if it works, his bunky walks into power on votes, just like ortega did in nicaragua. ....
they`re on plan "b"....... and it`s working with the help of academia,hollywood,the media,and the indoctrinated lemmings...
tens, if not hundreds of millions killed by communism in one form or the other......yet all you hear ......crickets(cheep..cheep...cheep)
god help this country...liberalism is indeed a disease..
Last edited: