Boxing 7/25 - 7/26

BOXLOCKS

Surveyor
Forum Member
Sep 14, 2002
5,382
34
48
Hell
discord.gg
btp

btp

You got the lines backward, the
under is -160. I'm sure thats what
you meant.

Going against Fletcher when he has
a good size play on an under is not
a very good idea. I myself am not a
big fan of playing unders in boxing.
Look at Shieka-Pemb., if that fight
doesn't stay under what fight will.
Yes I have played and won a few
unders but...

The Klitschko-Lewis fight would have
gone over if not for the huge hole over
Klitschko's eye.

The Crawford-Muriqi fight would have
gone over if not for Crawfords broken
rib.

And I have lost a couple for sure unders.
Santos vs Zuniga was a very solid under
play that somehow went the distance.
The biggest problem is that the odds
makers know when a fight has a good
chance of going under and they make
you lay twice the money to get it. But
there is still a good chance the fight will
go over, this is where the books cash.

Most ko's that boxers rack up on their
record come early in their career against
very weak competition. So ko ratios can
be very misleading.

(That said)
Fernando has quikly finished off guys like
Fitz in the past. But Fits has only been ko'd
once in his career, 8 years ago, in the 6th
round.

I'm not touching it, but like I said, going
against Fletcher can ruin a perfectly good
Saturday night.

gl bl
 

BigTymePlayer

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 4, 2003
689
0
0
miami
Hey Box, i got the under at +140, i wasnt sure if i could mention the site, but i will try. Looselines.com has vargas over 6 1/2 -160 and the under at +140

so the under looks enticing since fletch likes it as well.

btp
 

BOXLOCKS

Surveyor
Forum Member
Sep 14, 2002
5,382
34
48
Hell
discord.gg
btp
There is something fishy here.
Books that once had the under at
-180 now have it at -120. I would
leave it alone, but gl either way.

bl
 

BigTymePlayer

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 4, 2003
689
0
0
miami
hey box, just went to check line again and same site now has the under 6 1/2 -145 and over 6 1/2 +125, sort of weird since i already have a small play on the under at +140, they must have made a mistake and just caught it.

enjoy the fight and i look forward to putting our heads together and winning some money in this forum.

btp
 

BOXLOCKS

Surveyor
Forum Member
Sep 14, 2002
5,382
34
48
Hell
discord.gg
GW
Congrats on the Pacquiao under!
Wish we would have got the Candelo
over. Oh well, can't win em all.

btp
I too look forward to working togethor
on winning some cash, welcome aboard!
Lots of good opportunities coming up.
I posted some plays for 7/29 - 8/2,
get on there and tell me what you think.

bl
 
Last edited:

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,573
226
63
"the bunker"
no biggie

no biggie

candelo did you proud....his style was perfect for keeping garcia off....garcia`s lack of punching power and one dimensional style killed him....nice call...

thanks to pacquaio.....i was shocked that after all i had read about the extensive amateur background,that lucero was as amateurish as he was..... i knew he couldn`t jab.....or punch straight....but he looked very bad...

if we could get lucero and vanderpool in the ring together,you wouldn`t need the air conditioning:D .....

some good stuff coming....marquez-gainer....corrales-casamayor(these 2 look like great match-ups).......too sharp johnson vs fernando montiel.....


not a bad night...big stuff on the horizon...maybe we can find one to really step out on....g.l.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top