There has been some talk of line movement in
boxing. Here is my take.
In mainstream fights, like the one tonight, line
movement is almost irrelavent as many poeple
will bet on guys like De La Hoya, Tyson, Lewis,
and Jones Jr. no matter who they are fighting.
This has been discussed in recent threads.
That is not the case in smaller non-mainstream
fights as no one will be betting on these fights
without good reason. I put a bet in with Oly on
the Alverez-Choi fight two days ago and they
still haven't graded the wager. When I called to
see what the problem was they acted like I was
the only one to bet on the fight, definitly the first
to call about it. I wouldn't dought that Oly had
less than 10 wagers on that fight. My point is that
only hardcore boxing cappers and people with
inside information are playing these fights. So
line movement in these fights should at least be
considered if not followed. I am not saying the
hardcores and insiders are always right but I
wouldn't want to be on the other side!
Off hand I can think of 3 non-mainstream fights
that the line moved in favor of the losing side or
total. But I can think of a dozen fights where the
line moved in favor of the winner...
Fields over Williams -120 to -200
Cintron over -105 to -160
Taylor over -120 to -180
Cotto under -120 to -180
Hill over Lalonde -300 to -475
Lerma-Phillips over -300 to -340
Ouma over Bojo. -300 to -400
And the list goes on.
I am not saying play all of the sides and totals that
are in favor of line movement, I just think it is foolish
not to consider it. For example, I was considering
playing the Cotto under in tonights non-mainstream
undercard fight. But I noticed that Oly opened the line
at 4 rounds -120's. In one shot the over went to 4.5
rounds and -170. That is a big move for a fight that
won't get much action, and you know Joe Public is
not taking the over in a Cotto fight. That movement
was enough to make me wonder why the other hard-
cores or insiders are laying big money on the over.
And I may decide not to play the under because of it.
Just some food for thought.
In my next write-up I will ramble on about betting over
unders in boxing as I have seen interest in that topic
also.
gl bl