BYE BYE SUNS

Bombs

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 29, 2003
3,282
406
83
47
Earth
I hate to break it to you, but there is nothing wrong with that sentence.

If you replace the has with haves as you said, you end up with this:

"I respect Scott's selections as I know he have won in the past and have some decent thoughts."

Read it again.
 

Bombs

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 29, 2003
3,282
406
83
47
Earth
DIRTY Diapers said:
BOMBS = Donkey

Of course, this would be your response to making yourself an incontrivertable fool in the above posts.

As I said before, let's just stop.
 

DIRTY Diapers

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 13, 2005
2,670
5
0
47
Indianapolis
Bombs - You continue to make yourself look like a fool. Please learn how to write before commenting on somebody else.

Also, please try and watch more basketball games before you post. YOU contribute nothing to this forum.
 

DIRTY Diapers

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 13, 2005
2,670
5
0
47
Indianapolis
"Of course, this would be your response to making yourself an incontrivertable fool in the above posts.

As I said before, let's just stop."

"incontrivertable" - Spelling? Try incontrovertible... Don't use words that you can't spell. LOL.
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
DIRTY Diapers said:
Do yourself a favor and go buy a basketball book at the grocery store. Athlon, Slam, etc? Study up! Then come back and post. Thanks.

"Slam" is the authority on basketball? I suppose you also eschew the NY Times in favor of "The Source" and "XXL" as well? :scared
 

Bombs

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 29, 2003
3,282
406
83
47
Earth
DIRTY Diapers said:
"Of course, this would be your response to making yourself an incontrivertable fool in the above posts.

As I said before, let's just stop."

"incontrivertable" - Spelling? Try incontrovertible... Don't use words that you can't spell. LOL.

i and o are next to each other on the keyboard and that was actually a typo. I know how to spell words I use. I can also use has/have.
 

Bombs

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 29, 2003
3,282
406
83
47
Earth
gman2 said:
"Slam" is the authority on basketball? I suppose you also eschew the NY Times in favor of "The Source" and "XXL" as well? :scared

Gman: Don't waste your time, this guy is a moron.
 

Bombs

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 29, 2003
3,282
406
83
47
Earth
DIRTY Diapers said:
Anything "mag" would help tihs retard out.

"Anything 'mag'" - is this even in English.

Look, we know you are happy with your chalk play on the Spurs that have not even won yet. You also banged the Suns the last two games, so your profit is now greatly diluted.

Let's stop this.
 

DIRTY Diapers

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 13, 2005
2,670
5
0
47
Indianapolis
Bombs said:
"Anything 'mag'" - is this even in English.

Look, we know you are happy with your chalk play on the Spurs that have not even won yet. You also banged the Suns the last two games, so your profit is now greatly diluted.

Let's stop this.

Excuse me? I had the Spurs the first game. LOL. Nice try - donkey.
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
gjn23

What are your stats from? I said I think Sonics play better defense and match up better on defense against the Spurs vs the Suns. My opinions stems from games 3, 4, 5, and 6 in Sonics/Spurs series. But games 3 and 4 in Seattle, I think a lot may have had too do with Spurs losing focus but games 5 and 6 Seattle continued to play well with Spurs being focused. Duncan was quoted saying Sonics big men really gave him trouble and Duncan was not injured with other ankle for all of series up to game 6. Against Suns with 2 injured Ankles, Duncan started off slow (which you expect when injured) but has DOMINATED in the 2nd half. What would Duncan do without 2 injured ankles?

Duncan, Parker, and Spurs role players playing great against Suns. All 3 had trouble and 2/3 struggled against Sonics.

Letting teams score so you can score is not great defense. Maybe promotes offense but we are focused on defense only. Defensively, Sonics are better and better match against Spurs.

The evidence supports Sonics over Suns. And we are not even talking specific stats. Sonics were great team in games 3, 4, 5, and 6 and that is why Spurs struggled. But I think Spurs are to blame because they gave Sonics confidence because Spurs lost focus and intensity. I said Spurs won't lose focus against Suns especially when they get games 3 and 4 at home.
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
DIRTY Diapers

Not sure why you are getting on Bombs case for making wrong prediction. Maybe you 2 have past history I am not aware of. Although I remember Bombs did comment negatively towards your handicapping and that I felt was wrong.

People do get paid thousands/millions of dollars to make predictions and they are wrong more times than they are right. Bombs felt strongly Suns would win out. They lost games 1 and 2 and he posts saying congratulations to Spurs backers. You should respect that and not bash him. Nobody can be right all the time and he never said he was right all the time. Yes he was confident in Suns but you and I were just as confident in Spurs. I know I am not right in all my predictions but glad this one looks to be going my way. Win or lose, I always come back and you should respect Bombs for coming back congratulating all Spurs backers. But I don't think this series is quite over and I am tad worried about Duncans ankle. I will feel much better after Spurs win game 3. :) But I am happy to see Bombs concede defeat and Spurs up 2-0 with 3/5 games at home! :clap:
 

Jalen45

sikwitit!
Forum Member
Jan 13, 2003
1,082
2
0
in the northeast
:mj11: :mj11: :mj11:


seriously, how is this thread not locked already.

bombs and dd sound like they are in english class.

this is a gambling forum is it not?

geeeeez.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top