CNN propaganda EXPOSED!!!!

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Maybe you could give us a few examples and let us be the judge--

You report--We'll decide

My reasoning--have seen him in thousands of interviews and is rare anyone gets over on him--

Now you can go to blogs--that use split quotes/half quotes and M Moore tactics--

but one on one not many come out of debates with him on top.

 

[djv]

Hell I never would remember them. You need to watch his show. You can always catch O'Rielly replay at 11.

 

[Nick Douglas]

Maybe someone could answer this question--liberal media outlets including Reuters-MSN-Nyt ect have all been exposed this week by showing doctored/staged photos to enhance their slant and all unanimously have admitted and had retractions on same--

WHY have there not been any from conservative outlets caught doing same--is it they do not stoop to such or are liberals to inept to catch them?--but the way below is NYT's contribution to fraud in case anyone happened to miss it.

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/005687.htm

We are not obsessed with an imaginary media conspiracy. That's the reason.

It's also incorrect to point out that the conservative media is innocent here. There are several examples from the (equally imaginary) "War on Christmas" campaign. They claimed that Bloomingdale's instructed people not to say, "Merry Christmas," and Bill O'Reilly used a clip from The Daily Show that was several months old to try to emphasize a continuing War on Christmas.

I just see it as media outlets trying to create an emotional response rather than trying to further a political agenda. News outlets like the ones you cite are trying to create news that is extraordinary. Conservative entertainment outlets like Fox News are trying to create extraordinary incidents to incite conservative outrage.

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Right ACLU war on religion just a myth--tell that to the boyscouts-plegde of alliegence-in God we trust on money--Christmas displays--all just a myth that have somehow found their way into the court system--right?--if you say so.

 

[djv]

I'm Not sure we can call ACLU Media. And if ACLU sticks with constitutional items I can live with that. Until the knot is tied around some issues they will remain on the burner. In god we trust. Was it there from the start. And our money is a simple item used to purchase items. Should we tie our money in with God. I wonder what a simple man like God would want his name on something that has corrupted so many. I have such bigger problems to worry about. I cant get lost in that religious jungle. You either believe and I do that's good enough for me. Or you don't as some do.

 

[Nick Douglas]

Yes, the ACLU does definitely agree to pursue cases for people that want to limit public exposure and funding for groups that discriminate against gays and atheists. That is far from a "cultural war", however. These are minor cases that do not even cause the faintest stir among most liberals.

Conservative entertainment sources like Fox News love this stuff because a large portion of the conservative population is old and bitter. Many of them have a hard time adapting to societal changes. Many of them have to get riled up about something, so what better way to feed that beast than creating a Culture War that doesn't exist?