Evans loses it

[Zerwas]

Right, thats still another problem.

When Velazquez fought Rojas, he played Rojas at +100, but when I checked he wasnt available at that price anymore...there certainly werent many books if any who still had him at that price when he played him...well, fortunately, that doesnt happen too often.

 

[Zerwas]

Another bad week for Evan, not as bad as some of the prior weeks, but still pretty bad.

-1.65 units, and his only win was Harris who he played before Fullers weight problems were discovered, so he might even have been lucky to get that win.

 

[crow]

When you look at his site, he correctly reported he multiplied his playing sum by 2.65 in 2007.

Even if the odds for some big dogs weren't possible to play online at the stakes he was advertising, you can't deny the guy's method works.

On the other hand, pro gamblers like us would certainly be able to pick a few fights in a whole year that would certainly yield the same profit, if not more.

Example, he didn't pick Alekseev to KO Calloway inside 8.5 rds at -165. That one was 95% sure to land.

Or Khan to win by vs KO Earl ( -300), who basically was shot after Katsidis, sure to land too.

Only these 2 would give you 1.86 combined.