fading the pac 10, big ten and big 12 today

lowell

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 6, 2003
9,177
89
48
taking other side of each matchup for .5 unit and playing acc, sec and big east sides for .5 unit.
 

Sun Tzu

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 10, 2003
6,197
9
0
Houston, Texas
lmao I guess you are trying to be funny rather than posting legit picks as you must not have looked at the schedule. You may have a problem with the Texas Tech-UCLA game. If you want you can just send me the juice.
 

lowell

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 6, 2003
9,177
89
48
am fading favs like tx tech today and minny tomorrow with any matchups when the weak conferences play each other. i have no legit picks [.5 unit action plays] or i would post picks and lines like i think you should. i am trying to be on the right side of which conferences are stronger in 1st round games only. oregon st and mizz proved to be good fades last night. tx am i did play because i know clemson plays poorly on the road.
 

yak merchant

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 13, 2000
966
4
18
Texas
With you on fading Pac 10. Think Big 12 may make it a bit more respectable this year. Big East won't be as strong as last couple. And ACC is still class. Good luck.
 

alamojoe

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2003
79
0
0
san antonio
this has the makings of a really good systyem, lowell; I'm going to give it a try for the 12:30 games today, and if it works, I'll keep keep using it, and don't worry about two-bit snipes from the peanut gallery; I remember your posts from last year which were very good; one of the problems with this forum is that most of the good posters have left, it's good to see you back :weed:
 

flapjack

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 13, 2004
1,244
7
0
I'm a big pac-10 fan and I think fading the conference in general terms makes sense - AZ - playing a pain in the ass, slow down team like Utah St, UCLA - not sold on, WA - should cruise in the 1st round, but big ? w/inside game, Stanford - no Grunfeld = big probs.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top