I get what you're saying. I don't know why you can't comply with a simply request: give me some sort of definition of depth. How do you measure it?
I can only suspect the reason you don't want to is that I can immiedately use the men's tour to prove you wrong, as I have today with competitive vs non-competitive matches, since you seem to think pro tennis is akin to factory piecework and the players should be stamping time cards.
Both tours have a pretty clear hierarchy. The top few dominate, the rest are varying levels of mediocre.
:mj07: :mj07:
you're still new, gl trying to get an answer but I'm on the other side:142smilie
you're still new
Actually he just changed his username, TennisTapir is not new.
He's a madjack vet.
Anyway, when u boys r done fighting lets talk jack sock Wimbledon futures...anyone else think he can win the title?
Is there a more dangerous man on grass than gulbis?
somebody up north has a new coach...
http://tennisconnected.com/home/2013/06/07/ljubicic-named-raonics-new-coach/
Sun:
1st set O 9.5 -140
2.8/2
Ferrer, hang tough.
15 of their 24 1st sets have hit at least ten......only 9 of the 17 on clay though....1 of the 2 roland garros one did
i think ferrer loses in 3, but hope he keeps the 1st set close for ya
they've played 17 times on dirt and ferrer has won 7 sets, and rafa has won 36.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.