- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,210
- 374
- 83
- 74
gun control
- Thread starter MadJack
- Start date
It looks like giving security personnel guns doesn't work either, seems they like run away when the shooting starts:facepalm:
I wonder why there are not 8 billion mass shootings in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Wales, England, Scotland, Finland, Norway, Denmark, Japan, and Sweden?
Hmmmmm, I wonder why?
I was informed that the Chipwich is back, so things are looking up for the American empire:spotting:
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?638533-Kickserv-this-is-for-you!
2015 52,000 people died of drug overdose (800 teens) with big pharma pumping pills to every corner of America and they all take money from big pharma. So your point is?
armed guard at every school with an AR-15 :0074 There are many veterans that need work
If the only job a vet can find is patrolling the schools waiting to have a flashback, you can have it.
You just had an armed guard at the school in Florida. He did nothing to stop it. Three armed officers showed up on scene and didn't stop it. I really like how you can see promise in a plan that just proved itself ineffective.
Also, there's a 130,000+ schools in the US. As a guy that doesn't ever want to pay for shit, how do you plan on funding this? Personnel, benefits, training, insurance, weapons, ammunition, certification, etc. probably will be expensive. A lot of schools have multiple buildings so they will probably need more than one guard. Probably need more than one anyway since the example cited above proved fruitless when the wrong guy with a gun is hired to protect it.
More guns is such a dumbass argument.
Traffic congestion? Solution = more traffic.
Pollution concerns? Solution = more pollution.
Idiocracy is here.
If you can't see the correlation between Pence and Trump receiving millions of dollars from the NRA (along with a bunch of other US Politicians) and the lack of gun control then you should just go bowling with hedgehog and be done with it.
So anybody know why there are not a billion mass shootings in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Wales, England, Scotland, Finland, Norway, Denmark, Japan, and Sweden?
I'll wait for hedgehog to answer, he knows what's up.
Please don't clog hedgehog's brain with actual facts, he doesn't respond well to that.
Are drugs also included in the second amendment? The first?
Quualudes are no longer manufactured and no longer available to buy anywhere. Maybe at the fictitious "black market" I keep hearing about but nobody seems to know where it is or who runs it but I digress.
AR-15s are not required for hunting or home safety. They're bit required for anything and are designed to mutilate tissue on a grand scale. Banning them would not cause anyone to suddenly be unable to protect themselves or hunt. It literally be completely forgotten about in very short order just as it already was in previous bans in the U.S.
The issue I have is there is zero compromise from the right and only deflection and absurd comparisons tip completely unrelated situations. I get it, people like shooting them for whatever reason yeah, that's hardly a reason not to at least acknowledge that prevention of something usually works best if you remove the cause. However there is zero willingness from the right to ban AR-15s under any circumstances and that is not a constitutional liberty
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
