I somewhat agree with yyz. I think the MVP should be the player that is more important to his team then any other player in the league, but its never voted on that way. Its always been a statistical award. I do however think that Faulk should have won the award because if he were out of the Rams line-up for the season they probably would have lost 6 + games.(I know he missed 2 games but thats not like missing the entire season) I can't say the same for Warner. Faulk does it all(including Block) and gets in the endzone consistently. He's the best player in the game and should have been MVP.
My MVP top 3
1)Faulk
2)Kordell- They would have won 6 games without him.
3)Favre
My MVP top 3
1)Faulk
2)Kordell- They would have won 6 games without him.
3)Favre