at least we know why you don't post about politics too much
I think if Gore would have at least possibly won his own freaking state he may have won
JOHN MCCAIN
- Thread starter MadJack
- Start date
at least we know why you don't post about politics too much
I think if Gore would have at least possibly won his own freaking state he may have won
breaking news
breaking news
johnny has or had a grilfriend and she is a lobbyiest. NYT's story tonight. http://www.nytimes.com/
breaking news
johnny has or had a grilfriend and she is a lobbyiest. NYT's story tonight. http://www.nytimes.com/
Last edited:
It used to be a conservative website until the Centrists bitch-slapped everyone. Now it's Dogs and GW on the right, Ptgard on the waaay left and the Centrists, the rulers of the political forum. :clap: :spotting: :clap:
Now Bobby
I think you will agree--most conservatives have no prob admitting to being conservatives--however have seen few if any here admit to being liberal--
Case in point--if you back the #1 liberal candidate in congress--chances are you are liberal--with some exceptions--I can certainly sympthize with Jack--and his wanting change when it directly effects ones business--
--But for most others I enjoy trying to visualize which sign they would be enthusiastically toting at Obama's rally--the give us Hope--or the Yes We Can --and have Jabbers pegged as a fainter.
I think you will agree--most conservatives have no prob admitting to being conservatives--however have seen few if any here admit to being liberal--
Case in point--if you back the #1 liberal candidate in congress--chances are you are liberal--with some exceptions--I can certainly sympthize with Jack--and his wanting change when it directly effects ones business--
--But for most others I enjoy trying to visualize which sign they would be enthusiastically toting at Obama's rally--the give us Hope--or the Yes We Can --and have Jabbers pegged as a fainter.
Went through this bout 4 times and will give you same answer and let you run off and hide AGAIN with no response till next time.
Would be great achievement if we could enforce laws we have if not for liberals and their sanctuary cities (Chicago/Obama) snubbing their noses at federal law--just tried to get law passed requiring employers to verify SSN # of immigrants--and it has been stopped temporarily by Clinton liberal appointed judge--as what he deems unconstitutional--and how about the liberals (Obama) wanting to give illegals drivers license--again going against federal laws.
:0corn
Would be great achievement if we could enforce laws we have if not for liberals and their sanctuary cities (Chicago/Obama) snubbing their noses at federal law--just tried to get law passed requiring employers to verify SSN # of immigrants--and it has been stopped temporarily by Clinton liberal appointed judge--as what he deems unconstitutional--and how about the liberals (Obama) wanting to give illegals drivers license--again going against federal laws.
:0corn
Exactly. Those two dim bulbs--along with the dopey Hedgehog and Nosigar, are so far out on the right that all you centrists get labeled as liberals; and you guys in the middle are about as liberal as those I've mentioned are conservative--thats to say--not at all.
But hey, whatever you need to do to sleep at night, right?
Here some more of your supporters Redsfan--
Maybe you can all get together for a little:grouphug:
Poll is on who Al Jazeera readers are supporting.
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/91D4E785-6C56-4369-8FE0-704C5259C4E7.htm
Please note the results of this online poll are not scientific and are indicative only as a representation of the views of Al Jazeera's readers.Candidate US North Amer South Amer Eur Mid East Africa S/C Asia S/E Asia Aust Total
Democrats
Hillary Clinton 6.5% 10.6% 10.8% 11.9% 1.3% 10.8% 15.9% 11.9% 12.4% 6.2%
Barack Obama 36.0% 51.3% 62.2% 60.3% 4.4% 77.2% 66.7% 73.0% 54.9% 32.2% Mike Gravel 11.0% 3.7% 0.0% 2.5% 1.1% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 5.7% 5.6%
Republicans
Mike Huckabee 17.8% 2.3% 0.0% 1.0% 0.4% 2.5% 2.9% 1.6% 0.5% 7.9%
John McCain 6.1% 7.1% 16.2% 4.3% 1.7% 3.8% 4.3% 5.6% 5.7% 4.5%
Mitt Romney 3.0% 1.4% 2.7% 1.3% 76.1% 2.5% 2.9% 1.6% 2.6% 26.1%
Ron Paul 19.6% 23.7% 8.1% 18.7% 14.9% 3.2% 4.3% 6.3% 18.1% 17.5%
Total votes : 8333
Maybe you can all get together for a little:grouphug:
Poll is on who Al Jazeera readers are supporting.
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/91D4E785-6C56-4369-8FE0-704C5259C4E7.htm
Please note the results of this online poll are not scientific and are indicative only as a representation of the views of Al Jazeera's readers.Candidate US North Amer South Amer Eur Mid East Africa S/C Asia S/E Asia Aust Total
Democrats
Hillary Clinton 6.5% 10.6% 10.8% 11.9% 1.3% 10.8% 15.9% 11.9% 12.4% 6.2%
Barack Obama 36.0% 51.3% 62.2% 60.3% 4.4% 77.2% 66.7% 73.0% 54.9% 32.2% Mike Gravel 11.0% 3.7% 0.0% 2.5% 1.1% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 5.7% 5.6%
Republicans
Mike Huckabee 17.8% 2.3% 0.0% 1.0% 0.4% 2.5% 2.9% 1.6% 0.5% 7.9%
John McCain 6.1% 7.1% 16.2% 4.3% 1.7% 3.8% 4.3% 5.6% 5.7% 4.5%
Mitt Romney 3.0% 1.4% 2.7% 1.3% 76.1% 2.5% 2.9% 1.6% 2.6% 26.1%
Ron Paul 19.6% 23.7% 8.1% 18.7% 14.9% 3.2% 4.3% 6.3% 18.1% 17.5%
Total votes : 8333
Well there are more Dem's in the USA then Reb's. At least registered So there should be more here I guess. But make no mistake it's us Indepentents that rule out comes of elections. No one wins with out winning our approval. I wish there were even
more indys. We have to many party people that believe the chit there party tells them and never look at both side's of a issue.
more indys. We have to many party people that believe the chit there party tells them and never look at both side's of a issue.
We are witnessing DTB in a very strange situation. He never thought Obama would get this far. His whole strategy was to continue railing against the Clintons. What to do now? Can't seem to find his footing on how to break down Obama. Nothing really catching yet. This Alezeera thing is as pathetic as the Tony Robbins jokes. Keep trying, Dogs - it's fun watching you in dissarray.
Here some more of your supporters Redsfan--
Maybe you can all get together for a little:grouphug:
Poll is on who Al Jazeera readers are supporting.
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/91D4E785-6C56-4369-8FE0-704C5259C4E7.htm
Please note the results of this online poll are not scientific and are indicative only as a representation of the views of Al Jazeera's readers.Candidate US North Amer South Amer Eur Mid East Africa S/C Asia S/E Asia Aust Total
Democrats
Hillary Clinton 6.5% 10.6% 10.8% 11.9% 1.3% 10.8% 15.9% 11.9% 12.4% 6.2%
Barack Obama 36.0% 51.3% 62.2% 60.3% 4.4% 77.2% 66.7% 73.0% 54.9% 32.2% Mike Gravel 11.0% 3.7% 0.0% 2.5% 1.1% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 5.7% 5.6%
Republicans
Mike Huckabee 17.8% 2.3% 0.0% 1.0% 0.4% 2.5% 2.9% 1.6% 0.5% 7.9%
John McCain 6.1% 7.1% 16.2% 4.3% 1.7% 3.8% 4.3% 5.6% 5.7% 4.5%
Mitt Romney 3.0% 1.4% 2.7% 1.3% 76.1% 2.5% 2.9% 1.6% 2.6% 26.1%
Ron Paul 19.6% 23.7% 8.1% 18.7% 14.9% 3.2% 4.3% 6.3% 18.1% 17.5%
Total votes : 8333
How many of them are eligible to vote in the USA, Dogs? Like I said, dim bulb--but the light is so dim now that its almost gone out...
Here some more of your supporters Redsfan--
Maybe you can all get together for a little:grouphug:
Poll is on who Al Jazeera readers are supporting.
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/91D4E785-6C56-4369-8FE0-704C5259C4E7.htm
Please note the results of this online poll are not scientific and are indicative only as a representation of the views of Al Jazeera's readers.Candidate US North Amer South Amer Eur Mid East Africa S/C Asia S/E Asia Aust Total
Democrats
Hillary Clinton 6.5% 10.6% 10.8% 11.9% 1.3% 10.8% 15.9% 11.9% 12.4% 6.2%
Barack Obama 36.0% 51.3% 62.2% 60.3% 4.4% 77.2% 66.7% 73.0% 54.9% 32.2% Mike Gravel 11.0% 3.7% 0.0% 2.5% 1.1% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 5.7% 5.6%
Republicans
Mike Huckabee 17.8% 2.3% 0.0% 1.0% 0.4% 2.5% 2.9% 1.6% 0.5% 7.9%
John McCain 6.1% 7.1% 16.2% 4.3% 1.7% 3.8% 4.3% 5.6% 5.7% 4.5%
Mitt Romney 3.0% 1.4% 2.7% 1.3% 76.1% 2.5% 2.9% 1.6% 2.6% 26.1%
Ron Paul 19.6% 23.7% 8.1% 18.7% 14.9% 3.2% 4.3% 6.3% 18.1% 17.5%
Total votes : 8333
Yeah, these results are surprising. We launch an elective war against a country in their region. A country that was no threat whatsoever to us. We are there 5 years later with really no end in sight.
We kill, oh, let's say conservatively 50,000 civilians of said country. We have one candidate from one particular party stating that he would be fine if we were there for another hundred years.
It is truly shocking that the people of that region wouldn't want the same party re-elected.
On a related note, aren't you implicitly saying that Al-Jazeera readers are, um, bad people? Why would you think that? Aren't these the same people that we're 'helping?'
If you cited a poll of terrorists, it would still be silly and entirely irrelevant, but there would some point in there, as vacuous as it may be.
But when you quote a poll of ordinary citizens? The same ordinary citizens who, according to you and other pro occupation types, are happy for our help and dying (literally) for freedom?
Your implication is clear and sometimes true colors come out in subtle and unintended ways.
Smurph-Matt-Reds--Why is it liberals/centrist always counter #'s with opinion?
Smurph I called Micheal Moore and ask him if he thought you were centrist--this was his reply--
http://www.wjno.com/cc-common/mlib/1182/02/1182_1203550205.jpg
--and you don't like the Tony Robbins--couldn't think of better comparison--I'm thinking about letting H use it in debate tonight--but thought better wait till AR has that dinner locked up.
Smurph I called Micheal Moore and ask him if he thought you were centrist--this was his reply--
http://www.wjno.com/cc-common/mlib/1182/02/1182_1203550205.jpg
--and you don't like the Tony Robbins--couldn't think of better comparison--I'm thinking about letting H use it in debate tonight--but thought better wait till AR has that dinner locked up.
Last edited:
I wasn't disputing your numbers. They make perfect sense. I was just kind of wondering what point you were trying to make with your 'numbers.'
Wayne, off topic, but if u have to drive be careful!! Do not go on Smallhouse road. I just got home after being stuck there for over an hour. Be careful!
Thats good, but I vote for Madjack's Communist Daily.
All in favor vote yes. Everyone voting no will be shot...:mj07:
Thanks Clint I saw your early post to Va Nurse upstairs and was going to warn you when it started but you had already logged off---
Matt- Only thing I'm trying to do is get anyone to to dispute who the terrorist will overwhelmingly be pulling for in election.
Oops missed Jabbers post--might have to explain it to him.
A. Al-Jazeera is a muslim/terrorist sypathizing news outlet
B. Therefore their readers in all probabity subscribe to their views
C. Their readers are pulling for obama by about 8/1 ratio of all other candidates combined.
can you figure out the rest or want me to continue----
Matt- Only thing I'm trying to do is get anyone to to dispute who the terrorist will overwhelmingly be pulling for in election.
Oops missed Jabbers post--might have to explain it to him.
A. Al-Jazeera is a muslim/terrorist sypathizing news outlet
B. Therefore their readers in all probabity subscribe to their views
C. Their readers are pulling for obama by about 8/1 ratio of all other candidates combined.
can you figure out the rest or want me to continue----
Last edited:
"On a related note, aren't you implicitly saying that Al-Jazeera readers are, um, bad people? Why would you think that? Aren't these the same people that we're 'helping?'
If you cited a poll of terrorists, it would still be silly and entirely irrelevant, but there would some point in there, as vacuous as it may be.
But when you quote a poll of ordinary citizens? The same ordinary citizens who, according to you and other pro occupation types, are happy for our help and dying (literally) for freedom?"
just refuse to address the point DTB? I understand.
If you cited a poll of terrorists, it would still be silly and entirely irrelevant, but there would some point in there, as vacuous as it may be.
But when you quote a poll of ordinary citizens? The same ordinary citizens who, according to you and other pro occupation types, are happy for our help and dying (literally) for freedom?"
just refuse to address the point DTB? I understand.
