Jones vs. Calzaghe

nj

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2007
1,684
0
0
Great posts by all the Calzaghe backers, don't get me wrong, I'm not really playing Jones, I'm just NOT playing Calzaghe.
Im still very small on Roy, but if someone were to max their account on Joe, I wouldn't try to convince them otherwise. .

The Jones of this fight I don't think can be compared to himself vs Johnson, he really put no effort into the fight and didn't want to be there. All of the intangibles have improved: humility, ring intelligence, strategy, awareness of his opponents, motivation, conditioning, training habits. He also started from rock bottom in Ohio, and worked hard to get here.

Even with the intangibles improved, and even with a strong strategy, I don't think Roy's physical state lets him beat Joe. But it's enough to keep me from betting Joe, and I'm playing Roy very small for nostalgic purposes.

I posted vids of their workouts, which imo, is a far better indication of their ability than simply their appearance. Joe looks terrific in his workout, Jones didn't throw enough combos and still looks gun-shy, even in shadowboxing.

Roy's chance depends on how willing he is to sit down and analyze Joe as a fighter, and get over his superman ego of assuming he can beat anyone whenever he wants to. Bernard humbly studied Pavlik, and used effectively strategy to dominate him. If Roy analyzes Hopkins' strategy of counter-punching, and implements lateral movement, in-fighting and combinations, he can win this thing. And he must stay off the damn ropes!


That said, if I was recommending a bet to someone unfamiliar with boxing, I'd probably say Calzaghe KO, +400 ish.
 
Last edited:

nj

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2007
1,684
0
0
fwiw, I thought Hopkins beat Joe. That time, the judges preferred volume to clean punching. This could be the set of judegs, it could be Bernard's unlikable personality, it could have been his silly racial comments. The crowd was behind Joe and cheered every ineffective flurry, which could have swayed the judges.

Jones is the sentimental favourite amonst the crowd and the judges, if he is able to do same thing Hop did - land strong, clean punches in the midst of Calzaghe missed flurries - they might give him the nod. The crowd will react to every Jones land, and b/c Roy's punching power is better than Hopkins', Roy's punches should have a more dramatic and visible affect on Joe's head.
 
Last edited:

crow

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 3, 2008
773
0
0
There's 3 definyng factors in this fight:

1. Jone's EGO: it's as big as Manhattan ( maybe a bit bigger) and after Calzone's defeat of Hopkins and the fall of Pavlik, he knows that a victory over Joe would make him TOP DOG, and god knows he wants that BAD.
If that happens he won't stop talking until the new year.

2. Joe's hands: this fight was already postponned 2 months because they failed Joe in training. If it goes early, like in the Manfredo fight, can Joe defeat Jones with one single good hand ?

3. Joe doesn't have WARREN with him anymore; what will happen then if it goes to the cards ? You need influential people in these situations.
 

nj

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2007
1,684
0
0
I just read all of Jones' ESPN blogs and watched each of the 24/7 episodes, and Im probably letting my sentiments get in the way, but Im upgrading my Jones play.

I think he's treating this fight like a young, prime Jones did, he wanted Calzaghe from the beginning and sees something beatable in him.

In the Hatton/Mayweatehr build-up, the 24/7 crew focused on Hatton's strengths and Floyd's weaknesses, to trick the fans into thinking it was an even fight. I always look for that underdog bias in promo videos, and when I watched Cotto/Margo and Hop/Pavlik promos, I didn't see it. And now with Zag/Jones, I see an evenly-split breakdown, with fair and honest footage of both fighters. There doesn't seem to any promotional agenda to this, the camera crew treated Margo and Hop like live dogs, and now the camera crew is treating Jones as live in the same way, not a Rocky wannabe like Hatton or David Diaz.

Zag showed some vulnerabilities in his fight with Hop, where effective counter punching and speed can deter his volume, and stave off his rhythm. Hop just didn't have the stamina to maintain that for 12 rounds, which is why Zag was able to re-capture a rhythm and maintain a high output. Roy is faster, more accurate and more powerful than Hopkins, he can keep Joe off pace for the first half using the same tactics. If he's conditioned himself as well as it seems, he can carry that strategy at least through 9 or 10.

I'm flip-flopping like hell here, and I'm way more excited for this bout than I should be. Im betting this live.


Kudos to Weepaul for picking the dog and sticking to it, if Roy comes through all the props are on you.
 
Last edited:

weepaul

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 28, 2007
2,261
2
0
HA HA!!!

I am outright saying, Jones is going to win.

I rewatched the Hopkins fight and was shocked at how many lead right hands Hopkins landed.
Joe's workrate was not the same as he was getting tagged during flurry's.
I think that Roy is better than Hop at this type of fight and has underated snap on his punches.
He can also be a brutal body puncher when he wants to be.

I expect Joe to get tagged in between flurry's and be surprised at how quick and snappy Jones punches can be.

Whatever happens, GOOD LUCK ALL :toast:
 

crow

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 3, 2008
773
0
0
According to a very astute forum member, this fight will be determined by Joe's footwork: Jones will stand flatfooted and look for counters and will have early succes; but as rounds advance, this lack of mobility coupled with Roy's age and inclination to retreat to the ropes and Joe's adaptability will make him a sitting duck for Joe's attacks, and the end will come around the 11 th.

I kind of agree with that and played accordingly.

Ladbrokes gives the option of Joe being decked then winning for +1000.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,556
214
63
"the bunker"
Guys, workouts are just that: workouts.
Nothing more and nothing less.
A better indication would be the weigh in, and
Jones looked cut alright.
Actually, he looked incredible.
c621b9d2c55b864164e14c9461333afc-getty-83540725jb003_joe_calzaghe_.jpg

jones has looked like a god from day one...jeff lacy looked pretty impressive ,too..

unfortunately the photo doesn`t show reflexes or stamina......
 
Last edited:

tonymontana

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 27, 2005
797
1
0
Calzaghe inside at 350 and bout not going the distance at 180 looks good to me.

Lacy Kessler and Hopkins are all very tough guys to stop. Jones punch resistance at this stage plus Calzaghe sitting down on his punches more and his will to go out with a bang make a stoppage likley. Calzaghe will give Jones no time to breathe and rest.
Jones has to come up with something special in the first half of the fight and possible but if you cant put away guys like Trinidad at 170, hanshaw and Ajamu how do you stop Cal ?

Funny that the books didnt put up a knocked down or out option for this fight.
I can see Jones putting Cal on his ass but cal is a hard man to keep down.

If Jones wins this fight it would be a sensation for me and a great comeback for Roy to the pound for pound list.
In fact i would love to see glimpses of the old Roy but if you compare prime Jones like against Richard Hall video and the Trinidad fight. Jones looked like he had cancer.
I wish Jones the best tonight but i cant see it.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,556
214
63
"the bunker"
i`ve been sitting here considering that very thing...i`m only seeing zags inside at +333.....but that`ll do....

i just need joe to win,but,if the small prop hits,it`s gravy..

g.l.,t...
 

nj

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2007
1,684
0
0
Jones made no attempt to put away Hanshaw or Trinidad. He was way ahead on the cards and his opponents posed no threats, the only way he'd lose is if he got caught taking risks. Jones is a historically 'nice' fighter, and had good relations with Trinidad. He does not want to hurt opponents who pose no threat to him.

If he gets Joe hurt, he has to try and finish him. He doesn't have the stamina to close as strongly as Joe does, he will likely be behind on the cards, he has to take that risk.
 

Ghost Kid

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 23, 2008
14,004
3
0
Dmitri Salita

May you never grace my television screen again

U_G_L_Y
 

Ghost Kid

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 23, 2008
14,004
3
0
8 rounds ?!!?!?!?

OH NO !!!!

I have Augustus by 10 round decision

Here we go again with this bullshit....VOIDED bet...

why can't they list the right number of rounds ?

ARGHGHHGHGHGHGHGH!!!!!!
 

Ghost Kid

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 23, 2008
14,004
3
0
boxrec has it listed as a 10 rounder

what the hell?

who decides the number of rounds?

if they shortened this fight because of that idiot salita going 12 i will go crazy !

damn :(
 
Last edited:

Ghost Kid

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 23, 2008
14,004
3
0
guess my bet wouldn't have mattered anyway

:mj07:

wrong decision

augustus won
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top