i hear you,k....but,then,why bother altering them?.....
i guess,just doing their part in the jihad....
i guess,just doing their part in the jihad....
Last edited:
Leftist media at it again!!!
- Thread starter dr. freeze
- Start date
The problem is with guys like this having access to a powerful software program like photoshop. It was the worry of many honest, hard working photojournalists that these type of things would eventually happen and there's not much they can do about it.
This guy is obviously Middle Eastern and has a bias. With AP and Reuters competing hard for stories, they are willing to hire who they can to cover this story. Unfortunately, not many unbiased journalists, I'm sure, are willing to risk getting killed to cover this story. The practice should be, to screen individuals and only hire unbiased people to do the work. But when news breaks, they grab who they can. The only thing to do is fire them immediately when they see a problem, which was done.
When the Americans went into Iraq, many American journalists were iembedded with the troups. Most of the coverage has been unbiased I would say. Therre have been numerous stories by American journalists about troop behavior and what not. But with this war, no journalists are embedded. That's a problem for getting unbiased coverage.
As for the ynet news website. It appears to be very biased itself and one I personally would not trust. They should be concentrating on the atrocities being perpetuated and how to fix it rather than some women who is standing in front of different buildings crying. The photographer was a cheat and has been fired. End of story. I personally trust the bum will never shoot for a reputable news organization again. Period!
Also, the varying time stamps have been explained in detail by AP. It is possible to have different time stamps from different photographers......
This guy is obviously Middle Eastern and has a bias. With AP and Reuters competing hard for stories, they are willing to hire who they can to cover this story. Unfortunately, not many unbiased journalists, I'm sure, are willing to risk getting killed to cover this story. The practice should be, to screen individuals and only hire unbiased people to do the work. But when news breaks, they grab who they can. The only thing to do is fire them immediately when they see a problem, which was done.
When the Americans went into Iraq, many American journalists were iembedded with the troups. Most of the coverage has been unbiased I would say. Therre have been numerous stories by American journalists about troop behavior and what not. But with this war, no journalists are embedded. That's a problem for getting unbiased coverage.
As for the ynet news website. It appears to be very biased itself and one I personally would not trust. They should be concentrating on the atrocities being perpetuated and how to fix it rather than some women who is standing in front of different buildings crying. The photographer was a cheat and has been fired. End of story. I personally trust the bum will never shoot for a reputable news organization again. Period!
Also, the varying time stamps have been explained in detail by AP. It is possible to have different time stamps from different photographers......
Last edited:
here's another one that may be questionable....
here's another one that may be questionable....
AP Beirut photo faces questions
Yaakov Lappin
A woman has made two appearances in photographs used by the Associated Press and Reuters, allegedly wailing over the destruction of her Beirut home. US bloggers have however noticed that photographs were taken two weeks apart from each other, according to times stamps on the images, and that the photographs were taken in different locations.
"Either this woman is the unluckiest multiple home owner in Beirut, or something isn't quite right," noted the author of the Drinking From Home blog.
In the first photograph , taken by Reuters, a woman is seen in front of a bombed out building in Beirut. "A Lebanese woman wails after looking at the wreckage of her apartment, in a building, that was demolished by the Israeli attacks in southern Beirut," Reuters said in its caption. The photo was dated July 22 2006.
A second photograph of a woman who looks exactly like the woman in the first Reuters image, even bearing the same scar on her left cheek, is then supplied by the Associated Press.
"A Lebanese woman reacts at the destruction after she came to inspect her house in the suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon," the Associated Press caption claimed. The date accompanying the photograph is August 5 2006, and the scenes behind the woman are different to those of the July 22 photo.
After receiving "some emails" about the photos, the BBC removed the Associated Press image from its own website.
The Associated Press has so far not responded to requests by Ynetnews for an explanation of the mysterious time gap.
Meanwhile, sections of the foreign media are continuing to display uneven coverage of Israeli and Lebanese casualties of war and scenes of destruction.
A BBC photo display entitled "In pictures: Conflict impact," made up of eight images, uses six out of eight pictures to illustrate damages in Lebanon , but pays scant attention to the human toll and large-scale damage sustained in northern Israel .
The photographs show images of Lebanese civilians and bombed out buildings and Beirut, and carry captions such as: "A woman in Beirut cries amid the destruction."
After the BBC says fighting is hampering aid deliveries in southern Lebanon, an image of an Israeli soldier praying is shown, covering his ears while an IDF canon goes off in the background. "But ground clashes in the area continue unabated," the BBC wrote, suggesting through the image that the Israel bore most of the responsible for clashes. There are no photographs of Hizbullah rockets, or Hizbullah members firing rockets at Israel in the series.
Only the seventh photograph in the succession shows an image of an Israeli woman mourning at a funeral, with the caption "Israelis are also counting their losses."
The last picture in the series is of an Israeli in an air raid shelter, but the person in the photo is made black by shadows, and appears to be a silhouette of a human figure. The person's age, sex, or any human features are impossible to make out ? an odd choice by the BBC considering the large number of available photographs of Israeli children and families in bomb shelters.
The BBC's website photo editor, Phil Commes, has also taken a neutral line on the faked photographs from Beirut supplied by Reuters , saying: "One man's color balancing is another man's grounds for dismissal."
Washington Post journalist: Israel wants rocket attacks on itself
Meanwhile, Washington Post journalist Thomas Ricks told CNN that Israel was deliberately allowing Hizbullah to fire rockets at its civilians.
"One of the things that is going on, according to some military analysts, is that Israel purposely has left pockets of Hezbollah rockets in Lebanon, because as long as they're being rocketed, they can continue to have a sort of moral equivalency in their operations in Lebanon," Ricks said.
Ricks added that "that's what military analysts have told me."
In addition, a caption provided by the AFP under a photo of rockets in Lebanon read: "Rockets fired from Israel are seen falling in the outskirts of the southern Lebanese port city of Tyre."
However, the USS Neverdock blog has spotted a contradiction, with Reuters writing under a photograph which appears to be identical: "Hizbullah missiles streak the sky as they are launched towards Israel from south Lebanon."
After analyzing the contradiction, the blog says: "Notice also the credit for the two pictures goes to two different photographers but they look like the exact same photo to me. One just has the buildings in the foreground cropped out. Was that done to disguise the fact that they are the same photo?"
Several blogs have been busy finding many more clues to forged and staged photographs, many of them taken by disgraced photographer Adnan Hajj. In particular, reports and images claiming that the IDF struck an ambulance are being challenged as false .
And in yet another suspicious case , two Reuters photographs of a Lebanese man holding a picture of Hassan Nasrallah has been challenged by the Jawa Report blog.
The same man is seen holding Nasrallah 's picture and saluting with glee, but the background for each photo of the man is dramatically different. While in one image a clear, blue sky can be seen, a second image of the man flashing a victory sign shows a dusty background, suggesting a bomb had recently been dropped in the area. Two buildings also mysteriously disappear the second photo, although both photographs seem to have been taken from the same location.
"Does this represent a dramatic change in the local architecture and air quality between the two shots, or was this yet another Lebanese stringer Photoshop project?" asks the blog's author, before
concluding: "Only the photographer knows for sure."
here's another one that may be questionable....
AP Beirut photo faces questions
Yaakov Lappin
A woman has made two appearances in photographs used by the Associated Press and Reuters, allegedly wailing over the destruction of her Beirut home. US bloggers have however noticed that photographs were taken two weeks apart from each other, according to times stamps on the images, and that the photographs were taken in different locations.
"Either this woman is the unluckiest multiple home owner in Beirut, or something isn't quite right," noted the author of the Drinking From Home blog.
In the first photograph , taken by Reuters, a woman is seen in front of a bombed out building in Beirut. "A Lebanese woman wails after looking at the wreckage of her apartment, in a building, that was demolished by the Israeli attacks in southern Beirut," Reuters said in its caption. The photo was dated July 22 2006.
A second photograph of a woman who looks exactly like the woman in the first Reuters image, even bearing the same scar on her left cheek, is then supplied by the Associated Press.
"A Lebanese woman reacts at the destruction after she came to inspect her house in the suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon," the Associated Press caption claimed. The date accompanying the photograph is August 5 2006, and the scenes behind the woman are different to those of the July 22 photo.
After receiving "some emails" about the photos, the BBC removed the Associated Press image from its own website.
The Associated Press has so far not responded to requests by Ynetnews for an explanation of the mysterious time gap.
Meanwhile, sections of the foreign media are continuing to display uneven coverage of Israeli and Lebanese casualties of war and scenes of destruction.
A BBC photo display entitled "In pictures: Conflict impact," made up of eight images, uses six out of eight pictures to illustrate damages in Lebanon , but pays scant attention to the human toll and large-scale damage sustained in northern Israel .
The photographs show images of Lebanese civilians and bombed out buildings and Beirut, and carry captions such as: "A woman in Beirut cries amid the destruction."
After the BBC says fighting is hampering aid deliveries in southern Lebanon, an image of an Israeli soldier praying is shown, covering his ears while an IDF canon goes off in the background. "But ground clashes in the area continue unabated," the BBC wrote, suggesting through the image that the Israel bore most of the responsible for clashes. There are no photographs of Hizbullah rockets, or Hizbullah members firing rockets at Israel in the series.
Only the seventh photograph in the succession shows an image of an Israeli woman mourning at a funeral, with the caption "Israelis are also counting their losses."
The last picture in the series is of an Israeli in an air raid shelter, but the person in the photo is made black by shadows, and appears to be a silhouette of a human figure. The person's age, sex, or any human features are impossible to make out ? an odd choice by the BBC considering the large number of available photographs of Israeli children and families in bomb shelters.
The BBC's website photo editor, Phil Commes, has also taken a neutral line on the faked photographs from Beirut supplied by Reuters , saying: "One man's color balancing is another man's grounds for dismissal."
Washington Post journalist: Israel wants rocket attacks on itself
Meanwhile, Washington Post journalist Thomas Ricks told CNN that Israel was deliberately allowing Hizbullah to fire rockets at its civilians.
"One of the things that is going on, according to some military analysts, is that Israel purposely has left pockets of Hezbollah rockets in Lebanon, because as long as they're being rocketed, they can continue to have a sort of moral equivalency in their operations in Lebanon," Ricks said.
Ricks added that "that's what military analysts have told me."
In addition, a caption provided by the AFP under a photo of rockets in Lebanon read: "Rockets fired from Israel are seen falling in the outskirts of the southern Lebanese port city of Tyre."
However, the USS Neverdock blog has spotted a contradiction, with Reuters writing under a photograph which appears to be identical: "Hizbullah missiles streak the sky as they are launched towards Israel from south Lebanon."
After analyzing the contradiction, the blog says: "Notice also the credit for the two pictures goes to two different photographers but they look like the exact same photo to me. One just has the buildings in the foreground cropped out. Was that done to disguise the fact that they are the same photo?"
Several blogs have been busy finding many more clues to forged and staged photographs, many of them taken by disgraced photographer Adnan Hajj. In particular, reports and images claiming that the IDF struck an ambulance are being challenged as false .
And in yet another suspicious case , two Reuters photographs of a Lebanese man holding a picture of Hassan Nasrallah has been challenged by the Jawa Report blog.
The same man is seen holding Nasrallah 's picture and saluting with glee, but the background for each photo of the man is dramatically different. While in one image a clear, blue sky can be seen, a second image of the man flashing a victory sign shows a dusty background, suggesting a bomb had recently been dropped in the area. Two buildings also mysteriously disappear the second photo, although both photographs seem to have been taken from the same location.
"Does this represent a dramatic change in the local architecture and air quality between the two shots, or was this yet another Lebanese stringer Photoshop project?" asks the blog's author, before
concluding: "Only the photographer knows for sure."
Now, The New York Times has issued a correction for a photo on its Web site, which the paper originally described as a Lebanese "body" being pulled from the rubble after an Israeli attack.
Astute readers pointed out the so-called "body" was very much alive in other pictures from the scene.
The Times now says the man "was injured during the rescue effort ? not during the initial attack ? and was not killed
Astute readers pointed out the so-called "body" was very much alive in other pictures from the scene.
The Times now says the man "was injured during the rescue effort ? not during the initial attack ? and was not killed
DOGS THAT BARK said:
I hope this is not a trend for the future, because all of us could really be in trouble by the dilemma this would cause.
Just think how easy this can be for anyone with today's technology.
