MadJack: small request regarding Kneifl's avatar
- Thread starter Woodson
- Start date
Whats this world coming to its narrow minded assholes like you thats ruining everything we have went to war for, died for, worked are asses off for and you are complaining about a picture
yeah agent, no chit where is jack, hell at least kosar should patrol this.
luckily we have ie for a solution, thanks ie
luckily we have ie for a solution, thanks ie
countinguy said:
That for should
Woodson-Toe to toe at the Super Bowl party :s4: WTF
Now youre trying to pick a fight with a guy you have never seen or talked to all on the internet...hmmmmm
I would say I will stomp your ass, but seeing as how you could be a ninja or some huge bad ass I cant say for sure. Please post a picture(clothed of course) so I can get a better idea.
I have no problem other than the fact you made a ridiculous request that I disagreed with. Glad IE fixed it.
You must have skipped over those other 17 people who were telling you to quit crying and blah blah.
Kneifl I will let you take it down if you put up Queer Eye Parcells for 3 weeks and have it say Cowboys suck right next to it 
For the good of the forum :mj07:
You guys voted it in!!!!!
For the good of the forum :mj07:
You guys voted it in!!!!!
:clap:vinnie said:HEY GET THE FVCK OF THE INTERNET AND GET BACK TO WORK :clap: I ASSUME THAT'S WHAT YOUR GETTING PAID FOR
Keep thinking this is a sports information site. ESPN is a sports information site, this is a sports gambling information and sports handicapping site as denoted on Jacks logo the number one HANDICAPPING forum on the web. Is it illegal? No, but neither is gay porn, do you watch gay porn at work? Actually dont answer that. I would love to hear you justify this to your boss "No sir, I really needed to find out what Marcus Vick's status was for tonight and what the spread was on the BC/Tech game tonight, its just for informational purposes. And I turned the avatars off!"
Agent,
I believe you are slightly misguided in your response to Woodson?s request. We as a civilization have to abide by rules that govern our behavior and provide equal rights to all members of our society. Woodson merely requested an action. I second the action, the action had a third and fourth follow up from regular members. That is our expression of the free speech you so dearly speak of. We have not infringed on anyone?s rights. We merely made a simple request.
You, on the other hand, have violated the ?no bashing? rule. I believe you have posted in the past about staying out of people?s posts that you don?t agree with. The sticky post that referenced the unacceptability of your posts has just been taken down. You have posted in this thread 10 times at this juncture. Sir, I believe that is nine too many.
As for work and Madjacks, I have spare time at work and an open internet policy. I assume many of us have the same. Please ignore the work comment, because it convolutes the subject. The moral or ethical questions are also unnecessary and foolish and should be saved for another post/time.
The point is clear. Woodson made a request which happens to be one I agree with. You may disagree and comment on the request, but please don?t bash. Woodson?s request is clearly within reason, your childish and irrational ranting is clearly out of bounds and you should be punished for junking up another members thread.
In conclusion, this is not a democracy, it is an autocracy. The ruling despot has decided to let several new elements into his site. Those include posted nudity, outward racism, and lack of notification of ?not work friendly? posts. I?m not a prude, and I happen to be a fan of several things others would deem immoral or wrong. In my opinion, the avatar is not the place for such pictures. My opinion, just like yours, Agent is just that, an opinion. Jack will decide which direction he wants his site to go.
Thank you for your attention.
I believe you are slightly misguided in your response to Woodson?s request. We as a civilization have to abide by rules that govern our behavior and provide equal rights to all members of our society. Woodson merely requested an action. I second the action, the action had a third and fourth follow up from regular members. That is our expression of the free speech you so dearly speak of. We have not infringed on anyone?s rights. We merely made a simple request.
You, on the other hand, have violated the ?no bashing? rule. I believe you have posted in the past about staying out of people?s posts that you don?t agree with. The sticky post that referenced the unacceptability of your posts has just been taken down. You have posted in this thread 10 times at this juncture. Sir, I believe that is nine too many.
As for work and Madjacks, I have spare time at work and an open internet policy. I assume many of us have the same. Please ignore the work comment, because it convolutes the subject. The moral or ethical questions are also unnecessary and foolish and should be saved for another post/time.
The point is clear. Woodson made a request which happens to be one I agree with. You may disagree and comment on the request, but please don?t bash. Woodson?s request is clearly within reason, your childish and irrational ranting is clearly out of bounds and you should be punished for junking up another members thread.
In conclusion, this is not a democracy, it is an autocracy. The ruling despot has decided to let several new elements into his site. Those include posted nudity, outward racism, and lack of notification of ?not work friendly? posts. I?m not a prude, and I happen to be a fan of several things others would deem immoral or wrong. In my opinion, the avatar is not the place for such pictures. My opinion, just like yours, Agent is just that, an opinion. Jack will decide which direction he wants his site to go.
Thank you for your attention.
lmao :lol: Don't worry that picture of S-Love will be taken down with a cowboys victory on Sunday!!
kneifl
kneifl
