When I first saw this on Fox Sunday In The Money show. My first reaction was this had to be in a newspaper someplace or fox would not give this out. Then I said to myself how come I don't know this for some one who follows the markets I should. Since 1942 When the Dem's are in the white house the market goes up 10.6% a year. When the Reb's are there it goes up 7.5%. Thats a easy extra 3% a year. Thats a nice 12% extra every 4 years. And yes I found where they got there date. From a Nights Riders article in the WSJ. This is to easy. Looks like the way we should all go.
Make More Money W/Dems
- Thread starter djv
- Start date
Good point. And when a Clinton is president the returns are like 50% a year. Too bad we can't get him back in office, those were the good ol' days. Peace, prosperity and the respect of the world.
WWII and the internet must not have had anything to do with that.....
only an uneducated buffoon would not be able to recognize this
only an uneducated buffoon would not be able to recognize this
peace prosperity, backing down to muslim extremists -- fueling their courage, selling our souls to the Koreans and the Chinese, refusing to prosecute worlwise terrorists threatening the US such as Osama Bin Ladin catering to the French...oh for the days of the Clinton foreign policy
Last edited:
Are you serious about returns are just joking??
Good point. And when a Clinton is president the returns are like 50% a year. Too bad we can't get him back in office, those were the good ol' days. Peace, prosperity and the respect of the world.
Prosperity yes but temporaey till inevitable bust followed boom of dot coms, Peace yes when you look the other way and pay monetary support to your advasaries your not going to gey much flak--till their locked and loaded, respect of the world---you GOT to be joking. He was laughing stock in every paper in evry country--their headlines constantly resembled something out of National Inquirer---Getting anialated in Somolia and doing the cut and run really showed em. In addition the Muslims chief complaint against western ways is immorality and ethics--he sure threw coals on the fire.
Out of curiousity what did he do that you figure gained respect from anyone(including his own family) except his accountant.
Good point. And when a Clinton is president the returns are like 50% a year. Too bad we can't get him back in office, those were the good ol' days. Peace, prosperity and the respect of the world.
Prosperity yes but temporaey till inevitable bust followed boom of dot coms, Peace yes when you look the other way and pay monetary support to your advasaries your not going to gey much flak--till their locked and loaded, respect of the world---you GOT to be joking. He was laughing stock in every paper in evry country--their headlines constantly resembled something out of National Inquirer---Getting anialated in Somolia and doing the cut and run really showed em. In addition the Muslims chief complaint against western ways is immorality and ethics--he sure threw coals on the fire.
Out of curiousity what did he do that you figure gained respect from anyone(including his own family) except his accountant.
I agree, Dogs. Despite a few minor mistakes, he really was an effective president.
While he personally probably didn't have anything to do with the prosperity, but then let's stop talking about inflation and fuel prices under Carter.
No, peace happens when you don't go randomly invading countries that aren't the least bit of an imminent threat. Containment of Saddam was obviously working just fine under Clinton. A ragtag Army that wouldn't fight, no Air Force, no Navy, not much more than rocket launchers and a few ancient worthless scuds for weapons. Yeah, Iraq was terrifying. Good thing we stopped them.
In Somalia, he made a mistake going there and he corrected it. He didn't play it quite so loose with our troops as Dubya does. It takes a big man to admit a mistake like that. Now multiply it by 20 and that's what Bush is dealing with. I won't be on the edge of my seat waiting for *him* to admit his mistake.
Actually, the Muslims main complaint is our historic presence over there. I would say that needlessly invading a country in the region might just be fueling the fire a bit more than receiving a BJ.
A guess 'respect' is kind of nebulous and hard to quantify, but even if it was conceded that newspapers were laughing at his sexcapades and nobody respected him, I would say that that is preferable to stirring up intense hatred aimed at our country from almost every nation in the world.
Yes, I was kidding about the returns, but not much else.
While he personally probably didn't have anything to do with the prosperity, but then let's stop talking about inflation and fuel prices under Carter.
No, peace happens when you don't go randomly invading countries that aren't the least bit of an imminent threat. Containment of Saddam was obviously working just fine under Clinton. A ragtag Army that wouldn't fight, no Air Force, no Navy, not much more than rocket launchers and a few ancient worthless scuds for weapons. Yeah, Iraq was terrifying. Good thing we stopped them.
In Somalia, he made a mistake going there and he corrected it. He didn't play it quite so loose with our troops as Dubya does. It takes a big man to admit a mistake like that. Now multiply it by 20 and that's what Bush is dealing with. I won't be on the edge of my seat waiting for *him* to admit his mistake.
Actually, the Muslims main complaint is our historic presence over there. I would say that needlessly invading a country in the region might just be fueling the fire a bit more than receiving a BJ.
A guess 'respect' is kind of nebulous and hard to quantify, but even if it was conceded that newspapers were laughing at his sexcapades and nobody respected him, I would say that that is preferable to stirring up intense hatred aimed at our country from almost every nation in the world.
Yes, I was kidding about the returns, but not much else.
- Feb 12, 2000
- 10,652
- 39
- 48
- 50
Two quick points:
1. If Fox is reporting such things, will you please shut the **** up about them NEVER reporting fairly.
2. Anyone who gives Clinton credit for the dot com boom must also give him credit for the bust. IT WAS A FALSE MARKET. WAKE THE **** UP!
1. If Fox is reporting such things, will you please shut the **** up about them NEVER reporting fairly.
2. Anyone who gives Clinton credit for the dot com boom must also give him credit for the bust. IT WAS A FALSE MARKET. WAKE THE **** UP!
can anyone seriously blame Clinton for Somalia? Seemed like gross inefficiency and under estimation of the opponent by our military to me.
I think Clinton was correct on going into Somolia I just didn't like how he left--but in his defence there are always things going on behind the scenes we are not privy to so I should give him the benefit of a doubt.Maybe he had legitamate reason for doing so. I think it did give terrorist a boost in thinking we did not have the fortitude to hang with the situation.
They try to exploit any perceived weakness.
You have the Phillipines pull out due to hostage and hostage taking increases 10 fold.
I see Pakistan just caught a big fish for us.
Hope they do the interrogating and don't send him here.
Fck the French and the Philipinnies we now have those joining that will and do make a differnce.
They try to exploit any perceived weakness.
You have the Phillipines pull out due to hostage and hostage taking increases 10 fold.
I see Pakistan just caught a big fish for us.
Hope they do the interrogating and don't send him here.
Fck the French and the Philipinnies we now have those joining that will and do make a differnce.
Phill and a few other countries should have stayed home in first place. To send 55/60 troops just to look good is BS. Either really help or admit they never really wanted to. This so call coalition been a joke from the get go.
kosar quote:"In Somalia, he made a mistake going there and he corrected it. He didn't play it quite so loose with our troops as Dubya does."
letting about 20 soldiers get slaughtered without sending in support troops & then abandoning them "is not playing so loose with our troops" ?
letting about 20 soldiers get slaughtered without sending in support troops & then abandoning them "is not playing so loose with our troops" ?
The troops were sitting on the beach and a boat off shore. Who the hell was in charge that day? And why were we there? And yes Clinton did take the blame. And that's something in it self since we have a guy now who passes the buck.
djv quote:" And yes Clinton did take the blame."
i don't remember clinton accepting the blame for this. as a matter of fact i don't think it's in clinton's make-up to accept the blame for anything he has done (ie-monica gate)
i don't remember clinton accepting the blame for this. as a matter of fact i don't think it's in clinton's make-up to accept the blame for anything he has done (ie-monica gate)
In reference to intial statement that indicated the dems were good for market would any Dem actually believeing this like to make friendly wager of a dollar a point on market move following election..
If bush wins I pay $1 point on any DOW move down you pay same on any upward move.
If Kerry wins I pay $1 a point on amy move upward you pay on any move downward.
Any taker
If bush wins I pay $1 point on any DOW move down you pay same on any upward move.
If Kerry wins I pay $1 a point on amy move upward you pay on any move downward.
Any taker
