It doesn't matter what I think. It doesn't matter what anyone thinks, only what the evidence conclusively proves. All the evidence in that case was either tainted and or tampered with and if you were to take a moment and objectively consider all the evidence as presented as if you were the defendant, there's zero chance you would ever accept it as proof of anything.
You will likely never agree with a not guilty verdict because you've had your mind made up for some time. But let's consider some of the most basic structural evidence that without it, there is no case at all. Time of death. The Coroner could not place the exact time of death to anything more exact than a 6 hour window. The prosecution alleged that the victims were killed between 10:20p and 10:55p as that is the only window of time where O J. Could have done it. To PROVE that the time of death was in that window the prosecution called a witness who lived in another unit that was across a street. Her name was Rosa or something like that, she testified that she heard a dog start barking at 10:20p and it was still barking at 1045p and she was absolutely positive of the tone because her husband got home at exactly 1050p that night, just like he always does. Her window was open and she heard the dog, no doubt about it. Now, you're on trial for your life. How happy so you think you might be that the prosecution expects a barking dog to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that those barks could only mean one thing. That's when Nicole was killed. A dog barking, no reasonable doubt at all? Well there's a problem, that woman's husband testified that he didn't get home at 1050 at all. As a matter of fact he testified that he walked in at 1120p that night and he never heard any dog barking anyway and that his wife was wrong in her testimony. So the MOST PIVOTAL evidence establishing time of death was directly impugned by an eyewitness and no reasonable doubt? I'd that was you in trial you'd be good with it?
