Mr. Kneifl,
I read and reread your statement/opinion concerning the China conflict and am still troubled by many, if not all, of your ideas.
Perhaps you could explain them a little further to me, as you said they are intelligent opinions and ideas so therefore you must have them thought out pretty good and have a strong base of logic behind them.
Right?
What they did was plain stupidity and Bush should let whoever the hell the chinese leader is (I don't know who he is, and I could really care less) that they made a major mistake and we are very disappointed with them, if it happens again in the next 10 years there will be WAR.
Now lets look at this opinion here. Which, according to your second post is intelligent based on who your relatives are (but we will cover that point in a minute).
1. You don't know who the leader of the country is yet you feel we should "nuke it". Do you know the repurcussions this will cause? The years of fallout, the deformities of children born, the radiation sickness of untold millions of people. And, yes, they must deserve this horrible fate for living in China right? Because they were born in a communist country they deserve to lead that horrible life. Because someone they did not even have the opportunity to vote into office, is making decisions about our troops, those civilians deserve to die.
Do you know the U.S. policy on nuclear weapons? Please remind me when the U.S. can use nuclear weapons as an OFFENSIVE tool. Are you ready to go over there and help clean up the remnants of the country once the bombs have struck? Or do you think we should leave all the rotting corpses and animal carcasses there so the neighboring countries can smell it and be reminded not to **** with the US?
What about the impact of other countries? How is Korea and Cambodia and Taiwan going to make it out of all that radiation alive?
And what is with the 10 year rule here? Why ten years? I would like to hear your intelligent, well connected response concerning that.
2. we will have to do the same thing we did with Japan to ChinaDrop a nuke on them when they least expect it.
Now tell me something, Japan and the US were in the middle of freaking WWII for the past 4 years and we were on the verge of stepping foot onto mainland Japan. There were test results out about the US testing atomic weapons.
HOW the heck could the Japanese be not expecting us to use it on them?
3. Now, lets go on to the validation of intelligence theory you seem to have invented.
I tell ya, I have read this line about 100 times in the last half hour and I absolutely can not stop laughing at it.
I am certainly entitled to my opinion on this subject and you can bet that it is a intelligent one as well having relatives with political ties in D.C. and having an MBA myself.
PLEASE oh please oh PLEASE tell me you do not for one second believe this!
You have relatives with political ties in DC? weeeeeeeeelllllll wwwwwwwhhhhoooooooppppy freaaaaaaaaking dooooooody!
I am sure that those "political ties" have passed along the confidential information to your relatives and they have passed them on to you at their earliest opportunity in order for you to make such astute intelligent decisions.
Now add this on to the MBA you have and LOOK OUT! I for one would like to go back and change my vote for president to you my friend.
what the freak does having an MBA have to do with qualifying those opinions as intelligent?
Now, kneifl, here is your job. I met all your "requirements" so to speak. This post has a thesis, and supporting statements to go along with that thesis. It is well thought out and grammatically correct. I have not strayed from the message topic. It contains logic and reasoning.
So tell me Kneifl, why we should send nukes onto china, and justify the "intelligence factor" of your opinions.
I read and reread your statement/opinion concerning the China conflict and am still troubled by many, if not all, of your ideas.
Perhaps you could explain them a little further to me, as you said they are intelligent opinions and ideas so therefore you must have them thought out pretty good and have a strong base of logic behind them.
Right?
What they did was plain stupidity and Bush should let whoever the hell the chinese leader is (I don't know who he is, and I could really care less) that they made a major mistake and we are very disappointed with them, if it happens again in the next 10 years there will be WAR.
Now lets look at this opinion here. Which, according to your second post is intelligent based on who your relatives are (but we will cover that point in a minute).
1. You don't know who the leader of the country is yet you feel we should "nuke it". Do you know the repurcussions this will cause? The years of fallout, the deformities of children born, the radiation sickness of untold millions of people. And, yes, they must deserve this horrible fate for living in China right? Because they were born in a communist country they deserve to lead that horrible life. Because someone they did not even have the opportunity to vote into office, is making decisions about our troops, those civilians deserve to die.
Do you know the U.S. policy on nuclear weapons? Please remind me when the U.S. can use nuclear weapons as an OFFENSIVE tool. Are you ready to go over there and help clean up the remnants of the country once the bombs have struck? Or do you think we should leave all the rotting corpses and animal carcasses there so the neighboring countries can smell it and be reminded not to **** with the US?
What about the impact of other countries? How is Korea and Cambodia and Taiwan going to make it out of all that radiation alive?
And what is with the 10 year rule here? Why ten years? I would like to hear your intelligent, well connected response concerning that.
2. we will have to do the same thing we did with Japan to ChinaDrop a nuke on them when they least expect it.
Now tell me something, Japan and the US were in the middle of freaking WWII for the past 4 years and we were on the verge of stepping foot onto mainland Japan. There were test results out about the US testing atomic weapons.
HOW the heck could the Japanese be not expecting us to use it on them?
3. Now, lets go on to the validation of intelligence theory you seem to have invented.
I tell ya, I have read this line about 100 times in the last half hour and I absolutely can not stop laughing at it.
I am certainly entitled to my opinion on this subject and you can bet that it is a intelligent one as well having relatives with political ties in D.C. and having an MBA myself.
PLEASE oh please oh PLEASE tell me you do not for one second believe this!
You have relatives with political ties in DC? weeeeeeeeelllllll wwwwwwwhhhhoooooooppppy freaaaaaaaaking dooooooody!
I am sure that those "political ties" have passed along the confidential information to your relatives and they have passed them on to you at their earliest opportunity in order for you to make such astute intelligent decisions.
Now add this on to the MBA you have and LOOK OUT! I for one would like to go back and change my vote for president to you my friend.
what the freak does having an MBA have to do with qualifying those opinions as intelligent?
Now, kneifl, here is your job. I met all your "requirements" so to speak. This post has a thesis, and supporting statements to go along with that thesis. It is well thought out and grammatically correct. I have not strayed from the message topic. It contains logic and reasoning.
So tell me Kneifl, why we should send nukes onto china, and justify the "intelligence factor" of your opinions.
