O'Reilly thinks Rumshead should resign. Wow things are chaining. Even said those a little higher up better rethink how Iraq is working out. Hell that only leaves Cheney and Bush. I wonder if he still be working for Fox tomorrow.
O'Reilly Tonight Shock
- Thread starter djv
- Start date
The way they are fighting this war is a disgrace and I think they all should either show the stones and fight the war or get out. 20 Marines killed in two days is a disgrace. We have bombs and missles that will level that entire area and we wouldn't even have to worry about one American death. Bush should stop worrying about what the Arabs think about him and fight the war or get us the Hell out of there. What do we hope to win there anyway? It is a disgrace to have an American President who keeps putting American soldiers lives in jeopardy when we have better means to do it.
Oreilley has been on Rumsfield ass for a year or more.
Hope all those concerned about our troops share same concern when they return--
Hope all those concerned about our troops share same concern when they return--
i`m no o`reilly fan...but this is why o`reilly thrives and air america is ready to fold....
o` reilly has at least some semblance of objectivity....air america is nothing more than hysterical celelbrity ideologues battering bush and anything republican....
learn the lesson,myopics...
o` reilly has at least some semblance of objectivity....air america is nothing more than hysterical celelbrity ideologues battering bush and anything republican....
learn the lesson,myopics...
Oreilly is PRO-USA..we all are...Usually we all support our President in time of war..
But Cheney only knows how to steal. He doesn't know how to defend a nation.. Bush is gettiing terrible advice. And his henchmen are incompetant.
These guys are the worst.." BAR NONE "
But Cheney only knows how to steal. He doesn't know how to defend a nation.. Bush is gettiing terrible advice. And his henchmen are incompetant.
These guys are the worst.." BAR NONE "
DTB we support the troops. It is you and the other Neocons that don't. Why do you support cutting their benefits, not giving them the proper armour, and furthermore why do you support sending them in harms way for a lie? Not only that but we have the weapons to flatten any village in Iraq that we want to without losing a single one of those soldiers you pretend to care so much about. Why are we there? Saddam? WMD? 911? To spread freedom? Throw them all up in the air and whatever sticks you will defend. At the very least Bush could have the stones to say the truth instead of pretending to be so outraged because the enemy choses to fight back. If they want freedom in Iraq let them fight for it. No need to ruin any more American lives for what's a pipe dream at best. We have the best military in the world yet we have leaders who have chosen to fight by the enemies rules. It is not a new concept. I think a bunch of guys did that way back in 1776 fighting off the Red Coats. This is a disgrace to reduce our soldiers, guys who would do anything for their country, to targets for a bunch of scum who should be blown off the face of the earth. Maybe Boy George needs to take a Truman pill.
"DTB we support the troops. It is you and the other Neocons that don't."
Yep and also all the civilians killed in war UNTIL you get your agenda accomplished and then sit at airports and wait for their return.and on the civilians as in viet nam you didn't give a squat that over a million were killed as result of our leaving.
---and you REALY don't want to know what else I have to say on the matter.
Yep and also all the civilians killed in war UNTIL you get your agenda accomplished and then sit at airports and wait for their return.and on the civilians as in viet nam you didn't give a squat that over a million were killed as result of our leaving.
---and you REALY don't want to know what else I have to say on the matter.
The liberals are the one's who critisize our troops....calling them Nazis like Sen. Durbin (D) did. Ted Kennedy (D) said "our troops are the problem". Hell 3 weeks ago Pelosi declaired the war in Afghanistan over. It just goes to show how out of touch with reality these liberals are. As for conservatives not supporting our troops that has got to be the most absurd thing I've ever heard. It's just more liberal spew.
You would NEVER see a car with a "John Kerry" decal next to a "support the troops" decal. Never.
You would NEVER see a car with a "John Kerry" decal next to a "support the troops" decal. Never.
Last edited:
Stevie - you make some good points. But the tactics "W" is using appear par for the course. Yes, we could flatten any village or for that matter, Iraq in totality. But you must admit that that while many of our population would be happy, the outcry from liberals and other groups would thundering. W's problem (one of many) is that a lot of people (myself included) find him arrogant in his handling of the situation.
It's not arrogance, it's called having a pair of balls and using them. Genocidal murdering tyrants like Saddam Hussein NEED TO BE DEALT WITH. Over 400,000 mass graves uncovered so far in Iraq.
It's easy for people like Stevie to critisize the war when he gets to sit at home and whack it in front of his computer all day. 20 Marines dead is a disgrace. All the more reason to defeat these scumbags instead of turn and run away like liberal pussies.
BTW...Thanks for offering NO alternative solutions or ideas Stevie. John Kerry couldn't do it so I'm not surprised you couldn't do it either. That's why you guys can't win elections anymore. You are the party of surrender.
It's easy for people like Stevie to critisize the war when he gets to sit at home and whack it in front of his computer all day. 20 Marines dead is a disgrace. All the more reason to defeat these scumbags instead of turn and run away like liberal pussies.
BTW...Thanks for offering NO alternative solutions or ideas Stevie. John Kerry couldn't do it so I'm not surprised you couldn't do it either. That's why you guys can't win elections anymore. You are the party of surrender.
Last edited:
StevieD said:
So the liberal mind wants to blow up the entire country...even though 99% of the citizens are innocent people. You also want us to leave Iraq because we are angering the Muslims, yet on the other hand you want to bomb the entire country. I guess that wouldn't make the Muslims mad huh??? Thank god we don't have a mindless democrat in office. Could you imagine?? We would retreat and the terrorists would declair victory in Iraq.
UNREAL :clap: You liberals are priceless.
Last edited:
Manson you are a complete idiot. I offered you an alternative. Blow them off the face of the earth. You are the one who is afraid the Muslems would get mad at us. You say it right in your stupid, babling thread. And only a comnplete idiot would find war to be a liberal or conservative thing. If 99 percent of the Iraqis are good decent people on our side, then that 99% should have no trouble taking care of themselves. Maybe 1800 American deaths mean nothing to an arm chair warrior like you but I would like to know what your vision of iraq is after we leave. Whenever that is.because just like Vietnam, if we leave now or 10 years from now the outcome is going to be the same.
Mason having a pair of balls and being stupid at same time can be big problem. It takes more then my guns are bigger then yours. As you see they use little bombs and kill many. They can play this game in Iraq for years. With just little balls.
It's nice that Bush has taken a stand against terrorism...but he obviously does not know what the phuck he is doing or he expects Americans to believe his sudden "GOODIE TWO SHOES , I WANNA FREE IRAQ ACT " :mj07:
God almighty , Bush needs to give that cock and bull crap a rest. :mj07:
NOONE PHUCKING BELIEVES HIS PATHETIC CRUSADE OF I WANNA FREE IRAQ.
Do the job right or don't do it at all.
Anyway, what good is it going over there to eliminate a dictator when they keep letting these scumbags in The U.S.A. ??? :cursin: :cursin:
God almighty , Bush needs to give that cock and bull crap a rest. :mj07:
NOONE PHUCKING BELIEVES HIS PATHETIC CRUSADE OF I WANNA FREE IRAQ.
Do the job right or don't do it at all.
Anyway, what good is it going over there to eliminate a dictator when they keep letting these scumbags in The U.S.A. ??? :cursin: :cursin:
"...and on the civilians as in Viet nam you didn't give a squat that over a million were killed as a result of our leaving."
We could have won Vietnam had we decided to bomb the $hit out of the north and force a surrender.....instead we chose to fight a guerilla war inside the jungles and try to fight the communists piecemeal....."rules of engagement" where our fighter pilots could see the migs leaving airstrips to attack them but our guys didn't have clearance to raid the airstrips....instead attack at the same time everyday and bomb the same place for 10 days straight, after a couple days it looked like the moon, and those enemy migs just gassed up everyday for another dogfight....I'd never make it in the military because I'd be the guy flying over that airstrip tearing it to shreds instead of fighting for a military that declares that I need to call headquarters for permission to fire back as the enemy missiles are flying by....
We didn't have a valid reason for even being there, then we dragged it out for 10 years instead of playing to end it.
Train the Iraqi's halfa$$ security force so we can pull the hell out and let thier civil war continue....
We could have won Vietnam had we decided to bomb the $hit out of the north and force a surrender.....instead we chose to fight a guerilla war inside the jungles and try to fight the communists piecemeal....."rules of engagement" where our fighter pilots could see the migs leaving airstrips to attack them but our guys didn't have clearance to raid the airstrips....instead attack at the same time everyday and bomb the same place for 10 days straight, after a couple days it looked like the moon, and those enemy migs just gassed up everyday for another dogfight....I'd never make it in the military because I'd be the guy flying over that airstrip tearing it to shreds instead of fighting for a military that declares that I need to call headquarters for permission to fire back as the enemy missiles are flying by....
We didn't have a valid reason for even being there, then we dragged it out for 10 years instead of playing to end it.
Train the Iraqi's halfa$$ security force so we can pull the hell out and let thier civil war continue....
Now your making sense Marco-
-Was indeed a military blunder--going to war in area (70 miles from China) where you know your hands will be tied. If not for threat of intervention by China we could have won it in a month a been gone.
and agree with you on Iraq--the ultimate key to victory will lie in the hands of Iraq's.
There is no way to stop suicide bombers anywhere--however I think they made critical error when targeting civilians and Iraqi military as it makes all there jihad BS against the West an obvious smokescreen to their real objective.
-Was indeed a military blunder--going to war in area (70 miles from China) where you know your hands will be tied. If not for threat of intervention by China we could have won it in a month a been gone.
and agree with you on Iraq--the ultimate key to victory will lie in the hands of Iraq's.
There is no way to stop suicide bombers anywhere--however I think they made critical error when targeting civilians and Iraqi military as it makes all there jihad BS against the West an obvious smokescreen to their real objective.
Will be interesting to see who are the financial contributors are--would be nice if they listed members also---
Friday, August 05, 2005
By Bill O'Reilly
No surprise, a New York chapter of the ACLU (search) is suing the police for searching bags in the subway system. We knew this would happen because the ACLU has opposed nearly every anti-terror measure authorities have come up with since 9/11.
Here's how nuts this organization is: The ACLU opposes allowing the feds to have floating wiretaps that would monitor cell phone conversations of suspected terrorists. It opposes American civilians assisting the border patrol ? you remember the ACLU went to Arizona to monitor the Minutemen (search). It opposes profiling of suspected terrorists. It opposes military tribunals to try captured terrorists. It opposes coerced interrogations of captured terrorists. It has demanded that more pictures of Americans abusing prisoners at Abu Ghraib (search) be released, knowing that would help Al Qaeda (search) recruitment.
The ACLU opposes the sharing of information about suspected terrorists and sued to stop New York state from participating in MATRIX, the Multistate Anti-terrorism Information Exchange.
"Talking Points" could go on and on, but you get the picture. If the ACLU ever wants money, it should contact the Al Qaeda fundraisers. No organization in America enables terrorism as much as the ACLU, period. It is putting your life in danger. And that is no exaggeration.
Unfortunately, there's nothing we can do about it. No way to stop it. The ACLU operates within the law and uses the legal system to oppose the war on terror. And there are enough loony judges around to give that organization power, especially here in New York City and in San Francisco.
The only thing we can do is hold people who raise and give money to the ACLU accountable. In the weeks to come, "The Factor" will tell you who these people and organizations are, so you can decide whether or not you want to do business with them.
There are many issues I struggle with on this program, trying to decide what's right and what's wrong so I can present a cogent analysis to you. But the ACLU's opposition to all anti-terror measures is not one of those issues. This is a dangerous organization. The evidence of that is overwhelming.
Friday, August 05, 2005
By Bill O'Reilly
No surprise, a New York chapter of the ACLU (search) is suing the police for searching bags in the subway system. We knew this would happen because the ACLU has opposed nearly every anti-terror measure authorities have come up with since 9/11.
Here's how nuts this organization is: The ACLU opposes allowing the feds to have floating wiretaps that would monitor cell phone conversations of suspected terrorists. It opposes American civilians assisting the border patrol ? you remember the ACLU went to Arizona to monitor the Minutemen (search). It opposes profiling of suspected terrorists. It opposes military tribunals to try captured terrorists. It opposes coerced interrogations of captured terrorists. It has demanded that more pictures of Americans abusing prisoners at Abu Ghraib (search) be released, knowing that would help Al Qaeda (search) recruitment.
The ACLU opposes the sharing of information about suspected terrorists and sued to stop New York state from participating in MATRIX, the Multistate Anti-terrorism Information Exchange.
"Talking Points" could go on and on, but you get the picture. If the ACLU ever wants money, it should contact the Al Qaeda fundraisers. No organization in America enables terrorism as much as the ACLU, period. It is putting your life in danger. And that is no exaggeration.
Unfortunately, there's nothing we can do about it. No way to stop it. The ACLU operates within the law and uses the legal system to oppose the war on terror. And there are enough loony judges around to give that organization power, especially here in New York City and in San Francisco.
The only thing we can do is hold people who raise and give money to the ACLU accountable. In the weeks to come, "The Factor" will tell you who these people and organizations are, so you can decide whether or not you want to do business with them.
There are many issues I struggle with on this program, trying to decide what's right and what's wrong so I can present a cogent analysis to you. But the ACLU's opposition to all anti-terror measures is not one of those issues. This is a dangerous organization. The evidence of that is overwhelming.
