People paid for treason

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,309
368
83
71
WNY
USAID Exposed in New Scandal, Agency Gave Millions to Terror-Linked Orgs
By Cole Harrison
USAID Exposed in New Scandal, Agency Gave Millions to Terror-Linked Orgs



Washington’s wasteful spending has become legendary. Every year, billions of taxpayer dollars vanish into federal bureaucracies. The numbers are staggering. The oversight is minimal. The consequences are severe.
National security demands accountability. Yet some federal agencies seem determined to prove otherwise. When government incompetence meets international terrorism, Americans deserve answers. Those answers have finally arrived


A devastating report from the Middle East Forum has exposed the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for distributing $164 million in grants to radical organizations.
At least $122 million went directly to groups aligned with designated terrorists and their supporters. The magnitude of this mismanagement defies explanation.
You may like


From ‘Fox News’:
“The Middle East Forum’s multi-year study of USAID and State Department spending has uncovered $164 million of approved grants to radical organizations, with at least $122 million going to groups aligned with designated terrorists and their supporters.”

Following the Money Trail​

The investigation revealed USAID provided $900,000 to the Bayader Association for Environment and Development in Gaza. This organization operates in direct coordination with Hamas.

The timing is particularly alarming. The most recent payment arrived mere days before Hamas’s October 7 attack on Israel.
Sam Westrop, director of the Middle East Forum’s counter-extremism project, called the examples “horrifying.” The evidence shows USAID maintained funding even after terror connections became public. This suggests either catastrophic oversight failure or deliberate negligence.

A Pattern of Dangerous Decisions​

This revelation represents just the tip of the iceberg. In 2015, USAID channeled $125,000 to the Islamic Relief Agency.
The U.S. Treasury had designated this organization as a terrorist entity in 2004. Their connection to Osama bin Laden was well-documented.


Former State Department officials paint a troubling picture. One noted “a lack of embarrassment among USAID staffers about being associated with terrorist organizations.” The culture of impunity appears deeply rooted within the agency.




  • USAID approved $164 million in grants to radical organizations, with $122 million going to terror-aligned groups
  • The agency continued funding suspicious organizations even after their terror connections became public.
  • President Trump and Secretary Rubio are implementing sweeping reforms to prevent future abuse of taxpayer funds.
  • Essential humanitarian aid will continue under stricter State Department oversight and accountability measures.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DOGS THAT BARK

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,309
368
83
71
WNY
I wonder if the books will be scoured from 2016-2020?
Do you mean when the dems recklessly squandered all the money on frivolous investigations and drumming up false accusations in Trump's first term? If you ask me he should be awarded a third term to make up for all fraudulent shit stirring and wasting of time and taxpayer money.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
41,965
1,589
113
On the course!
Do you mean when the dems recklessly squandered all the money on frivolous investigations and drumming up false accusations in Trump's first term? If you ask me he should be awarded a third term to make up for all fraudulent shit stirring and wasting of time and taxpayer money.
It's a good thing no one asks you.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smitty

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
27,727
1,093
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
Do you mean when the dems recklessly squandered all the money on frivolous investigations and drumming up false accusations in Trump's first term? If you ask me he should be awarded a third term to make up for all fraudulent shit stirring and wasting of time and taxpayer money.
There were several convictions of Trump's first term administration. Facts and you just don't get along. Sad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smitty

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,439
132
63
Bowling Green Ky
USAID Exposed in New Scandal, Agency Gave Millions to Terror-Linked Orgs
By Cole Harrison
USAID Exposed in New Scandal, Agency Gave Millions to Terror-Linked Orgs



Washington’s wasteful spending has become legendary. Every year, billions of taxpayer dollars vanish into federal bureaucracies. The numbers are staggering. The oversight is minimal. The consequences are severe.
National security demands accountability. Yet some federal agencies seem determined to prove otherwise. When government incompetence meets international terrorism, Americans deserve answers. Those answers have finally arrived


A devastating report from the Middle East Forum has exposed the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for distributing $164 million in grants to radical organizations.
At least $122 million went directly to groups aligned with designated terrorists and their supporters. The magnitude of this mismanagement defies explanation.
You may like



Following the Money Trail​

The investigation revealed USAID provided $900,000 to the Bayader Association for Environment and Development in Gaza. This organization operates in direct coordination with Hamas.

The timing is particularly alarming. The most recent payment arrived mere days before Hamas’s October 7 attack on Israel.
Sam Westrop, director of the Middle East Forum’s counter-extremism project, called the examples “horrifying.” The evidence shows USAID maintained funding even after terror connections became public. This suggests either catastrophic oversight failure or deliberate negligence.

A Pattern of Dangerous Decisions​

This revelation represents just the tip of the iceberg. In 2015, USAID channeled $125,000 to the Islamic Relief Agency.
The U.S. Treasury had designated this organization as a terrorist entity in 2004. Their connection to Osama bin Laden was well-documented.


Former State Department officials paint a troubling picture. One noted “a lack of embarrassment among USAID staffers about being associated with terrorist organizations.” The culture of impunity appears deeply rooted within the agency.




  • USAID approved $164 million in grants to radical organizations, with $122 million going to terror-aligned groups
  • The agency continued funding suspicious organizations even after their terror connections became public.
  • President Trump and Secretary Rubio are implementing sweeping reforms to prevent future abuse of taxpayer funds.
  • Essential humanitarian aid will continue under stricter State Department oversight and accountability measures.

Interesting article/info Cricket. And more interesting when no comments were in disagreement but only those trying to change direction of post.
 

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,309
368
83
71
WNY
Interesting article/info Cricket. And more interesting when no comments were in disagreement but only those trying to change direction of post.
Truth will always be truth, regardless of lack of understanding, disbelief or ignorance.
W.Clement Stone
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
27,727
1,093
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
Interesting article/info Cricket. And more interesting when no comments were in disagreement but only those trying to change direction of post.
I decided not to read the article when it said USAID is linked to terrorists. As YYZ pointed out, Cricket's sources have an issue with credibility and this reeks of that. How about this disagreement with the "article": USAID is not funding terrorism. Let's get serious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kickserv

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,309
368
83
71
WNY
I decided not to read the article when it said USAID is linked to terrorists. As YYZ pointed out, Cricket's sources have an issue with credibility and this reeks of that. How about this disagreement with the "article": USAID is not funding terrorism. Let's get serious.
You guys always get so mad,when you're told what you know is common sense and true.
 

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,309
368
83
71
WNY
Common sense should tell you USAID wasn't funding terrorism.
These Democrats can’t stand the thought of scrutiny. They will not tolerate any attempt to rein in their abuse of power and position. They will do anything to keep their gravy trains running -- and themselves from being held accountable for their actions, despite the wishes of American citizens.

They are scared. Maxine Waters spoke for many when she said, “We don’t know what they have on us.”
 

Smitty

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2005
6,870
1,666
113
Upstate NY
These Democrats can’t stand the thought of scrutiny. They will not tolerate any attempt to rein in their abuse of power and position. They will do anything to keep their gravy trains running -- and themselves from being held accountable for their actions, despite the wishes of American citizens.

They are scared. Maxine Waters spoke for many when she said, “We don’t know what they have on us.”
Season 17 Idiot GIF by Paramount+


i truly hope, some day before you die, you realize what a fool you've been. but i reckon you'd die a lot happier if that day never comes.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: yyz and kickserv

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
27,727
1,093
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
These Democrats can’t stand the thought of scrutiny. They will not tolerate any attempt to rein in their abuse of power and position. They will do anything to keep their gravy trains running -- and themselves from being held accountable for their actions, despite the wishes of American citizens.

They are scared. Maxine Waters spoke for many when she said, “We don’t know what they have on us.”
Scrutiny would be a huge improvement to shit canning people and programs. I'd love scrutiny, but scrutiny requires intelligence, which is a non-starter for this administration.

@Smitty - Even when confronted with facts that disprove his BS, he just moves on to the next clickbait item. He's a lost cause.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kickserv

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,309
368
83
71
WNY
Scrutiny would be a huge improvement to shit canning people and programs. I'd love scrutiny, but scrutiny requires intelligence, which is a non-starter for this administration.

@Smitty - Even when confronted with facts that disprove his BS, he just moves on to the next clickbait item. He's a lost cause.
Correction..... Shit can thieves and fraudulent programs. So who are the fools/dolts when you imbeciles repeatedly gloss those facts over?
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top