Picks Thread: Harvey Dent vs. 3 Seconds

3 Seconds

Fcuk Frist
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2004
6,706
16
0
Marlton, NJ
May as well have some fun w/ this & play a few more: :shrug:

Add on games Day 4:

Cardinals/Marlins OVER 9 -105

ACTION

$52.5 to win 50

Rangers/Red Sox OVER 10.5 -105

Hunter vs ACTION

$52.5 to win 50

Phillies/Dodgers O 8.5 +100

Myers vs Kuroda

$50 to win 50

LETS SEE SOME RUNS TONIGHT!!

:scared :scared :scared
 
Last edited:

CryBoy

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2000
2,852
26
48
Arlington, TX
Big Chalk versus Action Jackson

Big Chalk versus Action Jackson

My money is on Harvey now. Action players rarely win at the end of each week. Selective chalk dusters can win long term.
 

3 Seconds

Fcuk Frist
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2004
6,706
16
0
Marlton, NJ
My money is on Harvey now. Action players rarely win at the end of each week. Selective chalk dusters can win long term.

What can I say...I was kinda bored w/ the whole thing so I went nutz.

I never play 7 or 8 games in a day.

2 Unfortunate losses w/ TB RL (up 2 in 13th w/ by 1), Boston O 10.5...Boston gets 10, 9 in the 2nd & Texas gets shut out, those 2 things are going to cost me today & put me behind after tonight, but no worries those things all even out in the end.

I will play more seriously again now that I am behind.
 
Last edited:

Jason-X

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 8, 2008
1,973
3
0
My money is on Harvey now. Action players rarely win at the end of each week. Selective chalk dusters can win long term.

I agree. People that only cares about "action" lose in the long run. Vegas loves people like that. The people that make $$$ off of sports gambling treat it like an investment or business.

What can I say...I was kinda bored w/ the whole thing so I went nutz.

.

No offense but you were the ONLY ONE that wanted this contest.
 

Theboundbook

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2002
32,998
25
0
54
Salt Lake City, Utah
UPDATE AFTER DAY THREE...

3 Seconds: Day 3 picks

Pirates RL -1.5 +125 over Reds
$50 to win 62.5

WIN: 62.50

Red Sox RL -1.5 -125 over Rangers
$62.5 to win 50

WIN: 50

Royals/White Sox OVER 9 -115
$88 to win 76.5

LOSS: 88

[24.50 for day]

3 Seconds CUMULATIVE TOTAL: 962.50



Harvey Dent: Day 3 picks

Boston Red Sox -230
$92 to win $40

WIN: 40

GM 2 Atlanta +117
$25 to win $31.50

LOSS: 25

Oakland -135
$67.50 to win $50

LOSS: 67.50

Seattle +140
$50 to win $70

WIN: 70

Florida -140
$70 to win $50

LOSS: 70

[-52.50 for day]

Harvey Dent CUMULATIVE TOTAL: 941.50

Come on you two! I know both of you can make money here. Or at least you could till this silly contest..... The rest of the board is making thousands and you guy's are worried about 50.00 bets for pride. Figure it out! You are not the other guy's book, so who cares. WE ARE ALL ON THE SAME SIDE AND WE ALL WANT TO WIN.

My recommendation: coattail the one's on fire here. Harvey, you were on fire till this silly thing and now you bet 180 degree turnaround on what kind of bets and size. WTF r u doing? Stick to what was working for you. You were making money and even if you werent, you were making others money by posting all these winners. 3 seconds: I know you also can make money so drop this silly contest, focus on picking winners and make yourself some serious cash!

THAT IS WHY WE POST PEOPLE!!! TO HELP EACH OTHER. Everyone has two streaks in em. A LOSING ONE AND A WINNING ONE. When someone is hot, they are hot; and when they are not, FADE EM.

ENOUGH SAID. Im going to get more foooked up and spend some more money tonight at the bar. (got home to shower and go back out to bar #2-6) Wooohooo!
 

Tapir Caper

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 14, 2008
583
0
0
UPDATE AFTER DAY FOUR...

3 Seconds: Day 4 picks

Orioles -112 over Indians
$56 to win $50

WIN: 50

Padres -105 over Brewers
$52.50 to win 50

WIN: 50

Rays RL -1.5 +120 over A's
$50 to win 60

LOSS: 50

Royals +150 over White Sox
$50 to win $75

LOSS: 50

Cardinals/Marlins OVER 9 -105
$52.5 to win 50

LOSS: 52.50

Rangers/Red Sox OVER 10.5 -105
$52.5 to win 50

LOSS: 52.50

Phillies/Dodgers O 8.5 +100
$50 to win 50

LOSS: 50

[-155 for day]

3 Seconds CUMULATIVE TOTAL: 807.50


Harvey Dent: Day 4 picks

[0 for day]

Harvey Dent CUMULATIVE TOTAL: 941.50
 

Jason-X

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 8, 2008
1,973
3
0
Come on you two! I know both of you can make money here. Or at least you could till this silly contest..... The rest of the board is making thousands and you guy's are worried about 50.00 bets for pride. Figure it out! You are not the other guy's book, so who cares. WE ARE ALL ON THE SAME SIDE AND WE ALL WANT TO WIN.

My recommendation: coattail the one's on fire here. Harvey, you were on fire till this silly thing and now you bet 180 degree turnaround on what kind of bets and size. WTF r u doing? Stick to what was working for you. You were making money and even if you werent, you were making others money by posting all these winners. 3 seconds: I know you also can make money so drop this silly contest, focus on picking winners and make yourself some serious cash!

THAT IS WHY WE POST PEOPLE!!! TO HELP EACH OTHER. Everyone has two streaks in em. A LOSING ONE AND A WINNING ONE. When someone is hot, they are hot; and when they are not, FADE EM.

ENOUGH SAID. Im going to get more foooked up and spend some more money tonight at the bar. (got home to shower and go back out to bar #2-6) Wooohooo!


:clap: :clap: :clap:
 

Chip Hilton

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 14, 2008
1,070
0
0
RI
LOL

LOL

I am passing today. Just nothing I like.

This is funny. No plays after daily plays of month, year, lifetime, decade mostly on the highest chalk on the board and here only one chalk play the entire week. Kind of defeated the whole purpose of seeing if a high chalk player could match against a more selective player. This contest got boring and lost steam by the second day.

Interesting point though that the high chalk player doesn't follow that same path when in a contest to be taken more seriously than the attention seeking games of whatever that didn't really matter. Seems to confirm the point that in baseball, it's all about units won and not the W-L record.
 

Theboundbook

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2002
32,998
25
0
54
Salt Lake City, Utah
This is funny. No plays after daily plays of month, year, lifetime, decade mostly on the highest chalk on the board and here only one chalk play the entire week. Kind of defeated the whole purpose of seeing if a high chalk player could match against a more selective player. This contest got boring and lost steam by the second day.

Interesting point though that the high chalk player doesn't follow that same path when in a contest to be taken more seriously than the attention seeking games of whatever that didn't really matter. Seems to confirm the point that in baseball, it's all about units won and not the W-L record.

Yea true pt, BUT Harvey really was banking units with the high juice plays... He won enough to make money. These little plays/and dog plays HAVE LOST HIM MONEY. Not sure why he didnt believe in what he was doing; it really was working. Big juice never has to be paid unless it loses. And he was selective enough to cover the units lost with all the wins.... I did think this would be more exciting then its been.
 

Jason-X

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 8, 2008
1,973
3
0
This is funny. No plays after daily plays of month, year, lifetime, decade mostly on the highest chalk on the board and here only one chalk play the entire week. Kind of defeated the whole purpose of seeing if a high chalk player could match against a more selective player. This contest got boring and lost steam by the second day.

Interesting point though that the high chalk player doesn't follow that same path when in a contest to be taken more seriously than the attention seeking games of whatever that didn't really matter. Seems to confirm the point that in baseball, it's all about units won and not the W-L record.


if you lay high chalk you HAVE to be selective or you will lose $$$ ;)

Just cuz I played ANA-180 on Tuesday, MIL-210 on Wednesday & Det-220 on Thursday doesn't mean I will be playing MIN-210 on Friday. Eventhough I like the twins I don't like the pitcher. Taking a shot on Philly-115.
 
Last edited:

grandpa

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 2, 2004
1,333
3
0
Las Vegas, NV
The most interesting part is not making any plays on a full card.

Guys, let your hair down, for chrissakes. Noone is judging your manhood.
 

CryBoy

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2000
2,852
26
48
Arlington, TX
I declare both 3 seconds and Harvey Dent be banned from Madjacks for 4 months based on this poor contest.

3 Seconds was out to prove that Harvey Dent can't win long term betting big favorites. What did Harvey do? He didn't bet any team favored by more than -150 and he started betting O/U's. It defeats the point. It's like watching a boxer who refuses to box.

3 Seconds, you are down by 134 points. Save yourself the embarrassment and just forfeit. Throw in the towel. At the rate that you're going (6 to 10 games a day), Harvey will win the contest by not playing anymore games. Again, that defeats the purpose of the contest.

Mod needs to shut down this thread.
 

Jason-X

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 8, 2008
1,973
3
0
I declare both 3 seconds and Harvey Dent be banned from Madjacks for 4 months based on this poor contest.

3 Seconds was out to prove that Harvey Dent can't win long term betting big favorites. What did Harvey do? He didn't bet any team favored by more than -150 and he started betting O/U's. It defeats the point. It's like watching a boxer who refuses to box.

3 Seconds, you are down by 134 points. Save yourself the embarrassment and just forfeit. Throw in the towel. At the rate that you're going (6 to 10 games a day), Harvey will win the contest by not playing anymore games. Again, that defeats the purpose of the contest.

Mod needs to shut down this thread.

3 seconds doesn't even post his plays. He called out Harvey who was posting his plays and WINNING to top it off to make it look like he was a big shot. 3 seconds has even admitted he only plays games for "action" that's why he plays so many games a night.

Just let Harvey post however he likes and if for some reason you don't like it STFU and don't go into his threads, SIMPLE EH!!!
 

3 Seconds

Fcuk Frist
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2004
6,706
16
0
Marlton, NJ
I declare both 3 seconds and Harvey Dent be banned from Madjacks for 4 months based on this poor contest.

3 Seconds was out to prove that Harvey Dent can't win long term betting big favorites. What did Harvey do? He didn't bet any team favored by more than -150 and he started betting O/U's. It defeats the point. It's like watching a boxer who refuses to box.

3 Seconds, you are down by 134 points. Save yourself the embarrassment and just forfeit. Throw in the towel. At the rate that you're going (6 to 10 games a day), Harvey will win the contest by not playing anymore games. Again, that defeats the purpose of the contest.

Mod needs to shut down this thread.

Stop with the exaggeration. I have averaged 3 plays per day.

I agree this has gotten boring, hence the shitload of plays last night.

I proved my point about what I thought about Harvey, as pointed out since he 100% changed his style for this contest. If he posted like this & not that junk we never would have had an issue.

I dont even care if I win or lose cause I feel like i have already won. What happened to those GOD, GOL, GOC & huge plays? When it came crunch time he showed its about UNITS & bankrolls as he has been betting short chalk & very small amounts.

His regular posts were a sham.

This contest is far from over, cause I had a bad/stupid night last night due to boredom. :nono:

BTW prior to Harv passing & me going nutz last night I had made 1 more play than HARV.

I love how you people love to twist & manipulate facts & truths for you own agendas.
 
Last edited:

3 Seconds

Fcuk Frist
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2004
6,706
16
0
Marlton, NJ
Day 5

White Sox -120 over A's

Floyd vs Braden

$120 to win 100

Yanks RL -1.5 -105 over Royals

Pettitte vs ACTION

$105 to win 100
 
Last edited:

CryBoy

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2000
2,852
26
48
Arlington, TX
Hey, 3 Seconds. Just f_cking with you, man!

I know your intent was to save newbies from following someone that plays heavy favorites without posting units.
 

3 Seconds

Fcuk Frist
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2004
6,706
16
0
Marlton, NJ
Day 5

Final Card:

White Sox -120 over A's

Floyd vs Braden

$120 to win 100

Yanks RL -1.5 -105 over Royals

Pettitte vs ACTION

$105 to win 100

Cardinals -108 vs Reds

ACTION

$108 to win 100
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top