poor favre
- Thread starter DR STRANGELOVE
- Start date
hey....a little acquaintance sexual harrassment is no biggie if the dude is, like, awesome.......:Yep:
you mean to tell me that nfl teams provide their players with "massages" by sexy female "massage therapists"?......
i`m going back into training....:walk:
i`m going back into training....:walk:
Geez the guy was just trying to get laid man who the F cares? Its what famous men do. So to have these opportunistic hos coming out of the woodwork is the real crime here.:mj07:
- Jun 11, 2007
- 4,564
- 3
- 0
QUID PRO QUO
QUID PRO QUO
:facepalm:
In the area of sexual harassment, quid pro quo describes a form of sexual blackmail. Quid pro quo sexual harassment is the conditioning of employment benefits on an employee's sub-mission to unwelcome sexual conduct. Title VII of the civil rights act (42 U.S.C.A. ? 2000 (e)-2 [1988]) provides a remedy for quid pro quo sexual harassment. Most courts follow the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's guidelines and hold that the necessary quid pro quo exists if submission to unwelcome sexual advances "is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment" or if submission to unwelcome sexual advances "is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual" (29 C.F.R. ? 1604.11(a)(1)-(2) [1997]).
:0002
I feel sorry for Deanna who goes this BS every time Brett acts a fool:violin:
QUID PRO QUO
:facepalm:
In the area of sexual harassment, quid pro quo describes a form of sexual blackmail. Quid pro quo sexual harassment is the conditioning of employment benefits on an employee's sub-mission to unwelcome sexual conduct. Title VII of the civil rights act (42 U.S.C.A. ? 2000 (e)-2 [1988]) provides a remedy for quid pro quo sexual harassment. Most courts follow the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's guidelines and hold that the necessary quid pro quo exists if submission to unwelcome sexual advances "is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment" or if submission to unwelcome sexual advances "is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual" (29 C.F.R. ? 1604.11(a)(1)-(2) [1997]).
:0002
I feel sorry for Deanna who goes this BS every time Brett acts a fool:violin:
:mj07:
honestly though, man do i feel bad for his wifey....she seems like a good woman gotta be rough with all the negative shit going on
