R v. R, NL v. NL (conf.) are ML 30-12, RL 24-18 after ALLSTARS Break.
0-0
ARZ-155
RL+135
GL
0-0
ARZ-155
RL+135
GL
Last edited:
RHP vs RHP in NL Conf. WEEK 8/10 - 8/16/2015
- Thread starter kenman
- Start date
MON 8/10 ML 1-0 +100 RL 1-0 +135
TUE 8/11 --- Whoa 10 games tonignt !!!
TOR -185
RL +100
CLE -120
RL +175 ==> CLE are 2-14 ML and RL at HM in series opener
KC -140
RL +150
MIN -125
RL +160
TB -170
RL +135
SEA -120
RL +170
R v R, NL v NL ==> 31-12 ML, 25-18 RL since ALLSTAR BREAK
CHC -130
RL +165
ARZ -165
RL +125
SD -115
RL +180
LAD -155
RL +145
TUE 8/11 --- Whoa 10 games tonignt !!!
TOR -185
RL +100
CLE -120
RL +175 ==> CLE are 2-14 ML and RL at HM in series opener
KC -140
RL +150
MIN -125
RL +160
TB -170
RL +135
SEA -120
RL +170
R v R, NL v NL ==> 31-12 ML, 25-18 RL since ALLSTAR BREAK
CHC -130
RL +165
ARZ -165
RL +125
SD -115
RL +180
LAD -155
RL +145
jng, depend on the lines you got
on the season HM Fav (-107+) where righty vs righty are :
SU:371-257 (0.57, 59.1%) avg line: -140.9 / 130.1 on / against: +$2,199 / -$4,829 ROI: +2.5% / -7.7%
RL:255-373 (-0.93, 40.6%) avg line: 158.9 / -172.8 on / against: +$2,529 / -$6,247 ROI: +4.0% / -5.7%
Since ALLSTAR:
SU: 64-34 (1.12, 65.3%) avg line: -143.5 / 132.6 on / against: +$1,717 / -$2,070 ROI: +12.2% / -21.1%
RL: 47-51 (-0.38, 48.0%) avg line: 157.7 / -171.7 on / against: +$2,088 / -$2,703 ROI: +21.2% / -16.0%
on the season HM Fav (-105+) where righty vs righty, where both team for NL Conf. are:
SU: 178-108 (0.78, 62.2%) avg line: -143.1 / 132.0 on / against: +$3,107 / -$4,202 ROI: +7.6% / -14.6%
RL: 124-162 (-0.70, 43.4%) avg line: 160.6 / -174.4 on / against: +$3,273 / -$5,188 ROI: +11.4% / -10.4%
Since ALLSTAR:
SU: 31-12 (1.74, 72.1%) avg line: -144.3 / 133.1 on / against: +$1,372 / -$1,493 ROI: +22.1% / -34.7%
RL: 25-18 (0.24, 58.1%) avg line: 161.4 / -175.8 on / against: +$2,201 / -$2,548 ROI: +51.1% / -33.6%
hope the format come out right
Now I see. Thanks.
The sample size (43 games) is not huge but it sure would stop one from playing the road dog--unless one is anticipating regression to the mean.
Do you intend to keep playing every R v R home fav on the ML and RL? Equal plays on RL and ML?
J
The sample size (43 games) is not huge but it sure would stop one from playing the road dog--unless one is anticipating regression to the mean.
Do you intend to keep playing every R v R home fav on the ML and RL? Equal plays on RL and ML?
J
And, even though you list tonight's AL games, you're talking about NL v NL only, right?
I'm trying it tonight for those for NL games.
I'm trying it tonight for those for NL games.
Since you edited your thread today Ken, a question for ya.
You are playing the home team with RHP vs RHP correct in the NL only?
You would have been 2-1 on Sunday, 1-0 last night, 3-0 on Saturday, 2-2 on Friday, 4-2 Thurs, 1-1 Wed and 2-1 last Tues.
GL!
:0074
been playing all the R v R the past 2 weeks ... last night and tonight just plays R v R, NL vs NL only.
records is base on 100 on ML and 100 on RL
for me 1 unit on ML
.75 unit on RL
1 units can be 10, 100, or 1000 up to you.
records is base on 100 on ML and 100 on RL
for me 1 unit on ML
.75 unit on RL
1 units can be 10, 100, or 1000 up to you.
I edited to change the ML records that I posted incorrectly.
this was my wagers from lastnight.
Wager details for ticket number 101959983-3:
Wager Type: Money Line
Wager Status: Win
Risk / To Win Amount: 219.00 / 150.00 ($) Accepted 8/10/2015 5:04 PM - (EST)
Won 150.00
Amount Paid: 150.00
Sport / Period: MLB Baseball / Game ( Philadelphia Phillies: 3 - Arizona Diamondbacks: 13 )
Line: Arizona Diamondbacks -146
Game Date: 8/10/2015
Game Time: 9:40 PM - (EST)
Pitchers: A. Harang - R - Action R. De La Rosa - R - Action
Wager details for ticket number 101959983-2:
Wager Type: Spread (or run line)
Wager Status: Win
Risk / To Win Amount: 75.00 / 108.75 ($) Accepted 8/10/2015 5:04 PM - (EST)
Won 108.75
Amount Paid: 108.75
Sport / Period: MLB Baseball / Game ( Philadelphia Phillies: 3 - Arizona Diamondbacks: 13 )
Line: Arizona Diamondbacks -1? +145
Game Date: 8/10/2015
Game Time: 9:40 PM - (EST)
Pitchers: A. Harang - R - Must Pitch R. De La Rosa - R - Must Pitch
Thanks, Kenman.
Eddie used to say that you had to keep an eye on the right-handed pitchers who got called up because they had to have a lot more velocity and control than lefties. I wonder if that somehow applies here when righty meets righty . . . Not sure how but, like you, I had eight solid winners tonight RL and ML.
Thanks.
Eddie used to say that you had to keep an eye on the right-handed pitchers who got called up because they had to have a lot more velocity and control than lefties. I wonder if that somehow applies here when righty meets righty . . . Not sure how but, like you, I had eight solid winners tonight RL and ML.
Thanks.
And the 12 American League plays went 9-3 with ML being 6-0 and RL 3-3. Maybe give those a try tomorrow, too.
What a night :00hour:00hour didn't expect to goes 10-0 ML ... but what can you said when FAV when 15-0 last night.
WTD ML 11-0 RL 8-3
MON 8/10 ML 1-0 +100 RL 1-0 +135
TUE 8/11 ML 10-0 +1000 RL 7-3 +700
WED 8/12 R v R, NL v NL in BOLD === FEW EARLY GAMES ...
ARZ -160
RL +135
SD -130
RL +175
SF -135
RL +165
SEA -130
RL +165
STL -120
RL +190 (STL are the best at this ML 29-6, not so great RL 15-20, but make up with O/U at 7-26-2)
UN 6.5 +100
CHC -170
RL NO LINE will update
TB -185
RL +115
MIN -115
RL +170
TOR-190
RL +100
* Lines could goes up or down ... if there Pitcher change to L v R or R v L, then there are no place for that game. Only play GM where R v R
WTD ML 11-0 RL 8-3
MON 8/10 ML 1-0 +100 RL 1-0 +135
TUE 8/11 ML 10-0 +1000 RL 7-3 +700
WED 8/12 R v R, NL v NL in BOLD === FEW EARLY GAMES ...
ARZ -160
RL +135
SD -130
RL +175
SF -135
RL +165
SEA -130
RL +165
STL -120
RL +190 (STL are the best at this ML 29-6, not so great RL 15-20, but make up with O/U at 7-26-2)
UN 6.5 +100
CHC -170
RL NO LINE will update
TB -185
RL +115
MIN -115
RL +170
TOR-190
RL +100
* Lines could goes up or down ... if there Pitcher change to L v R or R v L, then there are no place for that game. Only play GM where R v R
Last edited:
Nice job, Ken! I used all 4 NL games for that situation and round robin'd them, picked up 67 units!
All home teams, 15-0 sweep, first time in a long long time!! Scary!!
GL today!
:0074
All home teams, 15-0 sweep, first time in a long long time!! Scary!!
GL today!
:0074
Bad start out of the gate then finished strong for a + $$ day.
WTD ML 17-3 RL 13-7 == NL v NL ML 7-3 RL 7-3
MON 8/10 ML 1-0 +100 RL 1-0 +135 == NLvNL ML 1-0 RL 1-0
TUE 8/11 ML 10-0 +1000 RL 7-3 +700 == NLvNL ML 4-0 RL 4-0
WED 8/12 ML 6-3 +175 RL 5-4 +340 == NLvNL ML 2-3 RL 2-3
WTD ML 17-3 RL 13-7 == NL v NL ML 7-3 RL 7-3
MON 8/10 ML 1-0 +100 RL 1-0 +135 == NLvNL ML 1-0 RL 1-0
TUE 8/11 ML 10-0 +1000 RL 7-3 +700 == NLvNL ML 4-0 RL 4-0
WED 8/12 ML 6-3 +175 RL 5-4 +340 == NLvNL ML 2-3 RL 2-3
Only 3gms today...
NYM -250 ( mets are 24-7 ML on the season. Snydergaard are 5-1 ml & RL, 1-5 o/u )
RL +100
UN 7.5 -120
MIN -140
RL +135
LAD -195
RL +115
NYM -250 ( mets are 24-7 ML on the season. Snydergaard are 5-1 ml & RL, 1-5 o/u )
RL +100
UN 7.5 -120
MIN -140
RL +135
LAD -195
RL +115
