It's Post Time By Jon White
THE BIG THREE
The way I look at it, the 2010 Kentucky Derby winner probably will be one of the Big Three -- Eskendereya, Lookin At Lucky or Sidney?s Candy.
I am willing to take my chances with the Big Three vs. the rest of the Kentucky Derby field.
I concur with Churchill Downs morning line maker Mike Battaglia in how he currently sizes up the Derby wagering picture. Battaglia told Jennie Rees of the Louisville Courier-Journal that he plans to make Eskendereya the morning-line favorite, probably at 2-1 or 5-2. That?s exactly what I would do, too.
?That?s a very short price, a heavy favorite [in a race with 20 separate betting interests],? Battaglia said. ?I don?t see any way Eskendereya won?t be the favorite.?
Battaglia went on to say that he intends to make Lookin At Lucky the second choice on his morning line, probably at 4-1, with Sidney?s Candy the third choice at 8-1 or 10-1.
?You?d have to go double digits with everything else,? Battaglia said.
Point Given, at 9-5, was the biggest post-time favorite since Churchill Downs went to 20 separate betting interests in 2001, eliminating owner couplings and the mutuel field.
While Eskendereya no doubt will be the favorite, the absolute lowest he probably would be is somewhere from 6-5 to 9-5. But 2-1 or higher is much more likely.
It?s extremely doubtful that Eskendereya would be even money or less. Keep in mind that only two of the last 25 Derby favorites have been less than even money -- the coupling of Easy Goer and Awe Inspiring (4-5 in 1989) and Azeri (4-5 in 1992).
Only five of the last 25 Derby favorites have gone off at less than 2-1 -- Chief?s Crown (6-5 in 1985), the coupling of Easy Goer and Awe Inspiring (4-5 in 1989), Mister Frisky (9-5 in 1990), Arazi (4-5 in 1992) and Point Given (9-5 in 2001). All five lost.
The last Derby favorite to win at less than 2-1 was Spectacular Bid at 3-5 in 1979.
Big Brown, unlike Eskendereya, was undefeated going into the Kentucky Derby. However, some bettors might have shied away from Big Brown -- especially at the price -- because he had to start from post 20.
This year some actually have come to the conclusion that it?s not a Big Three (like me) or even a Big Two, but rather a Big One, Eskendereya. My HRTV colleague Jeff Siegel wrote last week that he thinks Eskendereya might sweep the Triple Crown.
?Eskendereya?s Wood Memorial 109 Beyer figure -- powerful that it is -- doesn?t really do him justice,? Siegel wrote at his HRTV.com blog. ?The Giant?s Causeway colt never had to extend himself. I know you?ve heard this before -- like a dozen times during the past two decades -- but this might be the year we finally have a Triple Crown winner for the first time since Affirmed in 1978.?
I understand where Siegel is coming from when he says that. His reasoning is similar to mine last year when I wrote that Pioneerof the Nile might sweep the Triple Crown.
My thinking with Pioneerof the Nile was, if he did win the Kentucky Derby, there would be a pretty good chance he would come right back and also win the Preakness Stakes. We?ve seen the Derby/Preakness double accomplished often in recent years. One of the main reasons for that is not many of the Derby horses run back just two weeks later in Baltimore as once was the case.
It?s the 1 1/2-mile Belmont Stakes that usually has thwarted a horse?s bid for Triple Crown glory since Affirmed. The distance just proves too long. But I felt that if Pioneerof the Nile won the Derby and Preakness, the Belmont might suit him the best based on his pedigree. His sire, Empire Maker, won the Belmont.
Pioneerof the Nile was good enough to defeat 17 rivals in the Kentucky Derby. But he had settle for second when unable to outrun 50-1 longshot Mine That Bird.
?Some of the previous 3-year-olds who were recently on the verge of Triple Crown immortality -- War Emblem, Funny Cide, Smarty Jones and Big Brown come to mind -- were noted speed horses who would always be considered suspect at 12 furlongs,? Siegel wrote. ?So no matter how dominant they may have appeared in both the Derby and Preakness, there was always a fear that the Triple Crown?s third jewel, the Belmont Stakes, would be beyond their scope. That certainly was the case with Smarty Jones; the others mentioned had other issues as well.
?But [trainer Todd] Pletcher will have so such worries with Eskendereya should he get to that point. Granted, the Kentucky Derby is hardly a slam dunk, and the always volatile Maryland spring weather can make the Preakness a bit treacherous. But if Eskendereya negotiates both minefields successfully, what, other than some mysterious Triple Crown jinx, will deprive him of a win in the Belmont Stakes and the Triple Crown??
Following Eskendereya?s 8 1/2-length victory in the Grade II Fountain of Youth Stakes at Gulfstream Park and 9 3/4-length romp in the Grade I Wood Memorial at Aqueduct, I felt he deserved to move to the top of my weekly Kentucky Derby Top 10 list. He is four for four on the dirt.
It?s certainly not hard to picture Eskendereya winning the Kentucky Derby. Heck, he might even win by a big margin again. Maybe he?s just that superior to everybody else.
But I also can see either Lookin At Lucky or Sidney?s Candy winning the roses. While I think Eskendereya has earned his way to the top of my weekly Kentucky Derby list, it does not necessarily mean he will be my pick to win the race. At this point, each one of the Big Three is a possibility to be my Derby pick.
Here is my current Kentucky Derby Top 10 list:
1. Eskendereya
2. Lookin At Lucky
3. Sidney?s Candy
4. Awesome Act
5. Rule
6. Ice Box
7. Dean?s Kitten
8. Line of David
9. Super Saver
10. Dublin
No horse is going into the Kentucky Derby more battle tested than Lookin At Lucky, who had an absolutely brutal trip and finished third in the Grade I Santa Anita Derby following troubled trips in the Grade II Rebel Stakes (which he won) and Grade I Breeders? Cup Juvenile (which he lost in a photo finish).
My main concern with Lookin At Lucky is his lack of a Beyer Speed Figure higher than 98. Perhaps he simply is not fast enough to win the roses. But even with that concern, I certainly would not be surprised to see Lookin At Lucky posing for pictures with Hall of Fame trainer Bob Baffert after the big race on the first Saturday in May, especially since the Smart Strike colt is overdue for some good racing luck.
As for Sidney?s Candy, as I wrote last week, the belief here he is a very serious colt. He showed he has the speed to win a race like the Grade II San Vicente Stakes at seven furlongs by 4 1/4 lengths on Feb. 15 and the class and stamina to win a race like the Grade I Santa Anita Derby at 1 1/8 miles by 4 1/2 lengths on April 3.
The Blood-Horse?s Steve Haskin, one of the sport?s keenest observers, wrote of Sidney?s Candy:
?What do you think of a horse who in his last three starts ran the quarter before the stretch call in :22 3/5, :23 1/5 and :23 1/5 and still closed his final eighths in :12 1/5 and :12 3/5 and final sixteenth in :06 flat? His overall come-home times of :35 2/5 and :35 4/5 (final three eighths) and :28 3/5 (final three-sixteenth) are nothing short of spectacular. Sounds pretty impressive for a closer, right? Well, then, what if that horse was a front-runner? It is those stats that make Sidney?s Candy so dangerous.
?Granted, he set very slow fractions in his last two races, but does this imply that maybe Sidney?s Candy doesn?t need the lead and can come home that fast laying off the pace? Of course, we have no way of knowing, but with Conveyance and his own stablemate, Line of David, likely to assure a rapid pace in the Derby, you can bet trainer John Sadler would like to see Sidney?s Candy take back. If he can and still come home that quickly, perhaps we are dealing with a pretty special colt.?
Tim Osterman of Today?s Racing Digest wrote of Sidney?s Candy:
?Some experts are ?knocking? Sidney?s Candy because of his easy trips in a trio of stakes scores at Santa Anita, but they are taking a rather superficial approach. While it seems certain that Sidney?s Candy won?t be able to coast early like he did in the Santa Anita Derby or the San Felipe Stakes, no one can really say for sure what the improving colt will do when he encounters a different pace scenario. Just because he hasn?t done it before (sit off the pace and run well), that doesn?t mean he can?t do it when asked. At this stage, Sidney?s Candy looks a whole lot like Sunday Silence heading into the Derby, and all he did was beat Easy Goer (the next Secretariat, according to all the East Coasters) for fun.
?Here the thing about Sidney?s Candy -- he should have no trouble getting the distance, he should actually improve on real dirt over what he?s been doing on the Pro-Ride and, mentally, he will enter the Kentucky Derby brimming with confidence. The only question is whether he?ll be able to adjust to a totally different sort of pace picture. If he can, he?ll give Eskendereya all he can handle and make it a match race down the lane while reducing everything else (including the still-static Lookin At Lucky) to trying-to-get lucky status.
?Logically speaking, here?s how the race should play out. A bunch of cheap speed goes for the lead while Sidney?s Candy sits back about fourth to gain perfect striking position. Around the far turn, he puts the other front-running types away and draws off while Eskendereya gets into the action. Eskendereya may blow right by Sidney?s Candy at the furlong pole or he may stall as the leader digs in and fights him off. There should be about 10 lengths back to the third-place finisher as the plodders run by the exhausted speed to fight out the minor placings in the superfecta. The best hopes to finish third and fourth would be Setsuko, Ice Box, Endorsement, Mission Impassible, Dean?s Kitten and Stately Victor.?
So the way Osterman sees the Kentucky Derby, it?s not a Big Three, but rather a Big Two, Eskendereya and Sidney?s Candy.
John Sadler, who trains Sidney?s Candy, saddled Line of David to win last Saturday?s Grade I Arkansas Derby at Oaklawn Park. Line of David darted immediately to the front and responded gamely late to prevail by a neck over Super Saver. Dublin finished third, a neck behind Super Saver.
Line of David, who now is three for three since adding blinkers, is yet another in a long line of horses to win a stakes race on the dirt this year following a start on synthetic footing in Southern California. Line of David joined such others as mighty Zenyatta (Grade I Apple Blossom at Oaklawn Park), Lookin At Lucky (Grade II Rebel Stakes at Oaklawn), American Lion (Grade III Illinois Derby at Hawthorne), Freedom Star (Grade III Azeri Stakes at Oaklawn), Conveyance (Grade III Southwest Stakes at Oaklawn), Zardana (New Orleans Ladies at the Fair Grounds over Rachel Alexandra) and Harissa (Sunland Park Oaks).
Perhaps Sidney?s Candy will add his name to the list by winning the Kentucky Derby following a start on a Southern California synthetic surface.
STRIKES UPDATE
The Big Three have zero strikes in terms of my nine key Kentucky Derby factors. I came up with these nine key factors in 1999 to determine how a Kentucky Derby candidate looks both from a tactical and historical perspective. For each of the nine categories in which a horse doesn?t qualify, the horse gets a strike. (The nine key factors appear at the end of the column.)
Beginning with 1999, here are how many strikes each Kentucky Derby winner has had:
1999 Charismatic (1 strike) category 5
2000 Fusaichi Pegasus (1 strike) category 6
2001 Monarchos (0 strikes)
2002 War Emblem (0 strikes)
2003 Funny Cide (2 strikes) categories 2 and 9
2004 Smarty Jones (0 strikes)
2005 Giacomo (2 strikes) categories 2 and 5
2006 Barbaro (1 strike) category 6
2007 Street Sense (0 strikes)
2008 Big Brown (1 strike) category 6
2009 Mine That Bird (4 strikes) categories 1, 4, 5 and 9
While last year?s Kentucky Derby winner had four strikes (and hasn?t won again since then), the horses who finished second (Pioneerof the Nile), third (Musket Man), fourth (Papa Clem) and fifth (Chocolate Candy) all had zero strikes.
The Kentucky Derby is limited to the 20 horses with the highest graded stakes earnings. Following are the strikes for the 20 Kentucky Derby candidates who currently have the highest graded stakes earnings, plus the next five horses on that list:
Zero Strikes:
American Lion
Backtalk
Dean?s Kitten
Eskendereya
Lookin At Lucky
Sidney?s Candy
One Strike:
Awesome Act (category 4)
Conveyance (category 6)
Dublin (category 4)
Endorsement (category 6)
Ice Box (category 3)
Jackson Bend (category 2)
Line of David (category 1)
Paddy O?Prado (category 4)
Rule (category 4)
Stately Victor (category 1)
Super Saver (category 4)
Two Strikes:
A Little Warm (categories 2, 4)
Discreetly Mine (categories 4, 5)
Mission Impazible (categories 3, 6)
Noble?s Promise (categories 4, 5)
Pleasant Prince (categories 2, 3)
Setsuko (categories 2, 3)
Three Strikes:
Homeboykris (categories 3, 4, 5)
Four Strikes:
Make Music for Me (categories 1, 2, 3, 5)
Here are the nine key factors:
1. THE GRADED STAKES FACTOR. (The horse ran in a graded stakes race as a 3-year-old before March 31.) This points out horses who have competed against tough competition early in the year at 3 and not just at the last minute in April, enabling the horse to be properly battle-tested. (Exceptions: Since the introduction of graded stakes races in the U.S. in 1973, only Genuine Risk in 1980, Sunny?s Halo in 1983 and Mine That Bird in 2009 have won the Derby without running in a graded stakes race at 3 before March 31.)
2. THE WIN IN A GRADED STAKES FACTOR. (The horse has won a graded stakes race.) This points out horses who have shown they have the class to win a graded stakes race. (Exceptions: Alysheba in 1987, Funny Cide in 2003 and Giacomo in 2005 are the only exceptions since the introduction of U.S. graded stakes races in 1973; Alysheba in 1987 did finish first in the Blue Grass only to be disqualified and placed third.)
3. THE EIGHTH POLE FACTOR. (In either of his or her last two starts before the Derby, the horse was either first or second with a furlong to go.) This points out horses who were running strongly at the eighth pole, usually in races at 1 1/16 or 1 1/8 miles. By running strongly at the same point in the Derby, a horse would be in a prime position to win the roses. Keep in mind that 44 of the last 46 Derby winners have been first or second at the eighth pole. Giacomo was sixth at the eighth pole in 2005; Grindstone was fourth at the eighth pole in 1996; Decidedly was third at the eighth pole in 1962. (Exceptions: Since 1955, the Derby winners who weren?t either first or second at the eighth pole in his or her last two starts have been Tim Tam in 1958, Carry Back in 1961, Cannonade in 1974, Gato Del Sol in 1982, Unbridled in 1990 and Sea Hero in 1993, with Canonero II in 1971 unknown.)
4. THE GAMENESS FACTOR. (The horse?s finish position in both of his or her last two races before the Derby was no worse than his or her running position at the eighth pole.) This points out horses who don?t like to get passed in the final furlong. (Exceptions: Since 1955, the exceptions have been Venetian Way in 1960, Cannonade in 1974, Foolish Pleasure in 1975, Ferdinand in 1986, Silver Charm in 1997 and Mine That Bird in 2009, with Canonero II in 1971 unknown.)
5. THE DISTANCE FOUNDATION FACTOR. (The horse has finished at least third in a 1 1/8-mile race before the Derby.) This points out horses who have the proper foundation and/or stamina for the Derby distance. (Exceptions: Since 1955, the only exceptions have been Kauai King in 1966, Sea Hero in 1993, Charismatic in 1999, Giacomo in 2005 and Mine That Bird in 2009.)
6. THE SUFFICIENT RACING EXPERIENCE FACTOR. (The horse has had at least six lifetime starts before the Derby.) This points out horses who have the needed experience. (Exceptions: Since 1955, Grindstone in 1996, Fusaichi Pegasus in 2000, Barbaro in 2006 and Big Brown in 2008 have been the only exceptions. Grindsone in 1996, Fusaichi Pegasus in 2000 and Barbaro in 2006 each had made five starts before the Kentucky Derby. Big Brown in 2008 had made three starts before the Kentucky Derby.)
7. THE NO ADDING BLINKERS AS A 3-YEAR-OLD FACTOR. (The horse has not added blinkers in his or her final start at 3 before the Derby.) This seems to point out that, if a horse is good enough to win the Derby, the trainer is not searching for answers so late in the game. (Exceptions: Since Daily Racing Form began including blinkers in its past performances in 1987, no horse has added blinkers in his or her last start at 3 before winning the Derby.)
8. RACED AS A 2-YEAR-OLD FACTOR. (The horse made at least one start as a 2-year-old.) (Exception: Apollo in 1882 is the only Derby winner who didn?t race as a 2-year-old. Since 1955, horses unraced at 2 are 0 for 46 in the Kentucky Derby, including two last year, Summer Bird (who finished sixth) and Dunkirk (11th). During that time, the only horses to even place or show were Strodes Creek (second in 1994) and Curlin (third in 2007).
9. NOT A GELDING FACTOR. (The horse is not a gelding.) (Exceptions: Funny Cide in 2003 and Mine That Bird in 2009 are the only geldings to win the Derby since Clyde Van Dusen in 1929.)