S.E.C. picks saturday feb 13 2010

[gsp]

With both Jenkins and Walker out, Vandy was lucky to win. Walker is the one that makes the offense run. Beal has said several times this year that when he gets in trouble Walker is always there to bail him out. Stallings said this morning that the offense never could get in sync.

Really good day SEC

 

[THUNDER]

hey no one respects him any more than i do.

I thought the poster was just asking him whether he was betting all the games since there was a ton of plays.
i was thinking that maybe the poster hadn't been here long and was wanting to know if a certain height in % play was a money play for him and maybe a 3% play was not a money play but maybe a play that he may lean to.
I thought it was a legit question.
Or maybe i am a little naive
and dont see when someone is blasting a poster

Thunder sorry for the confusion. but i did think he was asking an honest question and didn't deserve all the filth post that were thrown at him.

Best of luck in the future.

SEC I KNOW YOU DIDNT THATS WHY I ANSWERED YOU- I BET ALL MY GAMES IN STAGES TESTERDAY I BROKE UP IN 4 PARTS ,MORNING,3 OCLOCK,6 OCLOCKCK,AND 9


IF YOU READ HIS QUESTION IT INSINUATED SOMETHING DIFFERENT- TAKE CARE NICE JOB ON KENTUCKY- I HAD THEM HALF

 

[s.e.c guru]

if you win or lose a gm by a pt or 1/2 a pt... who cares.... there was no great job done capping.. you were either lucky or un lucky..... if a guy post a line what does it matter if he got a pt or a 1/2 better than you... if the paly is good enough to play at 12 it's good enough to play at 13 or 14... If it isn't don't play it.... I post lines at what it is at the time I post it... If i got it better or worse I still like it at the time posted & what players can get it at... What is the sence of posting a line that players can't get ??? are posters here to pad records or pass on solid plays ??? this is just a rant has nothing to do with anyone personally ...

many many games are won by 1/2 to 3 points so i care because even if i win by 1/2 point i still collect my money. and if you beat Vegas there is alot of luck involved and to think other wise is downright foolish.

 

[bryanz]

many many games are won by 1/2 to 3 points so i care because even if i win by 1/2 point i still collect my money. and if you beat Vegas there is alot of luck involved and to think other wise is downright foolish.

I agree, you missed my point...

 

[s.e.c guru]

I agree, you missed my point...

the line i post in my plays is the line i got when i played it.
the higher the play i post is the game that i think the line is off by the most points. so if i have a
25* play i fell the line to be considerably off, but if that play only wins by a 1/2 point I am more pleased than if it covers by 20 points.

Why you ask. Because i know that I was lucky to win a game I truly thought was a slam dunk.


GOOD LUCK TO ALL BECAUSE YOU WILL NEED ALLOT OF LUCK AND SKILL(knowing everything there is to know about the teams you are betting and betting against) TO BEAT VEGAS. GAMBLING 50% LUCK 50% SKILL + OR -- 10%

 

[el JB]

i may be wrong but a lot of plays that we cap seem to be easier than others because of the "talent " of the performers involved and that kind of plays we DON'T grade higher as the NUMBERS don't add up...in those cases i would RECOMMEND the capper to do a special MARK OR NOTE in order to highlight that play even tough the lines sometimes are misleading
IE: yesterday's OHIO STATE WAS A CAKEWALK :00hour even tough exactly capped in terms of pointsspread