serious question for the board

rusty

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2006
4,627
11
0
Under a mask.
You'd save bandwith if you just supplied one answer and you both signed it.:)

You really think everyone hasn't figured you out.


Why on earth would little muffins ever visit a gambling website since only posts are in political forum--and how did she/he/it -know the day the 250 post ban was lifted.

Not but 2 ways--either your joined at the hip--or like 2 peas in a pod so to speak :SIB

-is no doubt whatsoever the muffy character was transplanted here by you-for supportive purposes in one fashion or another.

Something seems odd.I like to know how he accessed this forum with low posts.Don't you need a certain amount or was that lifted with the password??
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
Never said a thing bout you and tramp being same person--he was here when you and muffins were wearing diapers or diaper should I say.
Bullshit. You made several posts about how Tramp & I post the same time of the day, have the same views, etc. None of which is true of course, but that's not important right now. What is important is that you get a grip on reality. These conspiracy theories of yours will only take you to the dark recesses of the human mind where few have ever come back from. Go toward the light DTB... :142smilie
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,471
139
63
Bowling Green Ky
You notice dogs ignored my post about that. :142smilie

Didn't ignore but didn't see reason to restate it--I might have added -from a vets point of view.

As I said it took less time to take 2 countries than it did Clinton and Albright to burn women and children out of Waco-

Actually I was waiting for you pinkies to back your opinion up with a fact of any you found more tactically efficient--but as always your facts/arguements are confinded to ":142smilie "--it was Booosh or race baiting. Been a while since any of you had an original thought.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
Now to the thread topic. I will say that when I voted for O, I was hoping we were going to do a better job of getting our troops home.. As for the stiimulus and health care, I am still in a let's see what happens. I still am one of those who is blamming Bush for a lot of this shit. Even Bush knew he needed to do something stimulus wise but left it for the next president. I think I would of voted for Obama again. I just do not trust McCain and Palin. Now look at what Palin is spouting :facepalm: It's all a bag of shit but for some reason I think Obama means well and is more for the people's best interests. Bush just left such a sour taste in my mouth, I mean what a stupid man? His interests were more personal. Why can't the repubs put up somebody decent.. Have no problem voting conservative. Voted for thompson as wisky gov and then Bush stole him from us.
....................................................................

excellant post

I voted for Ross Perot
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
As I said it took less time to take 2 countries than it did Clinton and Albright to burn women and children out of Waco-
Actually I was waiting for you pinkies to back your opinion up with a fact of any you found more tactically efficient--but as always your facts/arguements are confinded to ":142smilie "--it was Booosh or race baiting. Been a while since any of you had an original thought.
Riddle me this Batman...

Ya gotta guy here (DTB) who I've NEVER seen post a single comment about the countless women and children of Iraq, Afghanistan or Pakistan who've died as a direct result of our invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Now his heart bleeds for the women and children of Waco. I wonder what it is about the Branch Davidians that makes their loss of life such a tragedy to DTB, yet he's never uttered a single word about the death of (possibly hundreds of thousands) of women and children as a result of our "War on Terror".

Hmmm... what could it be? :0corn
 
Last edited:

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
Didn't ignore but didn't see reason to restate it--I might have added -from a vets point of view.

As I said it took less time to take 2 countries than it did Clinton and Albright to burn women and children out of Waco-

Actually I was waiting for you pinkies to back your opinion up with a fact of any you found more tactically efficient--but as always your facts/arguements are confinded to ":142smilie "--it was Booosh or race baiting. Been a while since any of you had an original thought.

Same old shit from dogs. How many times are you going to change the subject?
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top