SERVICE PLAYS FOR 12/26

MB MLB 728x90 Jpg

GIANTS007

support 81
Forum Member
Oct 11, 2007
4,095
0
0
Location: Location
THE GOLD SHEET - COLLEGE FOOTBALL:


MOTOR CITY BOWL
PURDUE (7-5) vs. CENTRAL MICHIGAN (8-5)

Wednesday, December 26 Night at Detroit, MI (Dome; FieldTurf)

*Purdue 43 - CENTRAL MICHIGAN 27?

This game is a rematch from Sept.
15, when Purdue?s offense dominated early, building a 38-0 lead midway
through the third quarter. CMU mounted a modest comeback, but never really
threatened in 45-22 final, and most of Chippewas? yardage came after the
winner had been decided. The Boilermakers piled up 583 yards behind Curtis
Painter?s 29-of-39, 3-TD, 360-YP performance. Purdue RB Jaycen Taylor
broke his arm in that game after carrying just 3 times for 28 yards, and sub Kory
Sheets filled in with 144 YR.
Painter has thrown for 7285 yards and 48 TDs the past 2 seasons, and cut his
interceptions to 9 this year (in 515 attempts). Painter?s favorite targets are WR
Dorien Bryant (82 catches, 8 TDs), 5th-year sr. TE Dustin Keller (117 recs. the
last 2 seasons), and WR Greg Orton (58 catches in each of the last 2 seasons).
Painter?s receiving corps has thinned somewhat since the Sept. 15 game. WR
Selwyn Lymon (40 catches in ?07, 6 of those on Sept. 15) was kicked off the
team in late November after his arrest for DUI. On the positive side, RB Taylor
returned to action in October and added speed to the running game, including
a 157-yard performance against Northwestern.
While we respect the accomplishments of multi-threat CMU soph QB Dan
LeFevour, who ran for 1008 yds. & 17 TDs this season in addition to throwing
for 3360 & 23, it?s the Chippewa defense that is the problem. CMU wasn?t able
to stop anyone outside of an injury-riddled N. Illinois side during the regular season
and a limited Miami-Ohio attack in the MAC Championship game. Non-MAC foes
have scored 47 ppg against CMU, and the Chips were 111th in the country in pass
defense. While LeFevour is a dynamic force in the MAC, he had 3 of his 4 least
productive performances this season in non-conference action. Admittedly, Purdue goes into this game on a 3-game losing streak, but those
losses were against bowl-bound Big Ten teams, as were all the Boilermaker
setbacks this season. The Boilers kept LeFevour in the pocket in their first
meeting, holding him to 26 YR (tied his season-low), and it?s his running ability
that makes the CMU offense effective. Purdue has more receiving threats,
more options in the running game, and a much better defense.

(07-PURDUE 45-C. Mich. 22...P.30-23 P.37/223 C.33/101 C.35/56/1/364 P.29/40/1/360 P.4 C.2)
(07-PURDUE -21' 45-22...SR: Central Michigan 2-1)
TEAM GP SUR PSR PF PA YR YP T-R-P YR YP T-R-P TO DIFF OPR
Purdue 11 6-5 5-5 31 26 132 281 43-18-21 155 243 35-19-15 +3 1.8 12.2
C. MICHIGAN12 8-4 6-4 35 35 191 269 58-33-23 165 287 57-24-30 +6 -.1 18.7
 

GIANTS007

support 81
Forum Member
Oct 11, 2007
4,095
0
0
Location: Location
THE MAX- Dave Fobare

Motor City Bowl @Detroit, MI
December 26, 2007, 7:30PM EST
Central Michigan vs. Purdue
Opening line: Purdue ?10, 74
Current line: Purdue -8.5, 71?
Analysis by Dave Fobare
Central Michigan makes their way to the Motor City
Bowl by successfully defending their 2006 MAC title
in the first year of Butch Jones' tenure. Jones'
accomplishments in 2007 were substantial. He
changed the offensive scheme from the pro-style
spread attack based primarily in the air to a system
modeled closely on West Virginia's spread single
wing. He managed this successfully despite having
very little talent to choose from in the running
department and the need to replace a pair of high
NFL draft choices on the offensive line.
This matchup is a rarity on the bowl scene: a
rematch of a regular season game. Purdue hosted
CMU on September 15 and won 45-22 as a 22-point
favorite. But the final score doesn't quite paint an
accurate picture of the difference between these two
squads on that day. Lets focus instead on the
Boilermakers' first five drives in that game. They
started four of those drives at their own 24, 28, 43
and 24 yard line. The fifth was started on CMU's 19-
yard line. That was a potential 300 yards of offense
available to Purdue. Purdue successfully marked off
296 of those 300 yards and used just 28 plays to do
it. Only thru sheer luck and a couple of Boilermaker
miscues did the Chippewas manage to escape the
first quarter down only 24-0. Purdue was in full
?prevent? mode to start the second half, allowing
CMU QB Dan LeFevour to garner a lot of garbage
yards and make the score look respectable.
This weakness against bowl-quality opposition
wasn't just limited to Purdue. The Chips also lost 52-
7 to Kansas, and 70-14 to Clemson. And the scores
are indeed representative. In those three games
CMU was outrushed by 1.2, 2.8 and 2.4 yards per
carry. They were outpassed by 4.1, 2.5 and 5.9
yards per attempt.
I realize there is no real reason for Purdue to be
excited about this game. They've already beat CMU.
As a destination Detroit ain't exactly Florida. Or
California. Or Arizona. Southeastern Michigan is not
a top recruiting area for them. But the MAC is on the
downswing and CMU is just the best of a bad bunch
of football teams and has been pummeled by bowl
opponents by a 167-43 count. My own stat based
model makes Purdue an 11-point favorite, and I
refuse to abandon that value just to chase bowl
technical systems that favor big dogs.
Recommendation: Pass. (LOL LOL)
 
MB NCAAF 728x90 Jpg

GIANTS007

support 81
Forum Member
Oct 11, 2007
4,095
0
0
Location: Location
SPORTS MEMO

Purdue vs. Central Michigan +9 O/U 71.5 Recommendation: Central Michigan
Wednesday, December 26, 7:30 pm EST (ESPN) Detroit, Mich

These two teams met back in early September in West Lafayette and
the result was not pretty for Chippewas backers. The Boilermakers
jumped out quickly to a 24-0 lead in the first quarter on the back of
Kory Sheets and arm of Curtis Painter. They would eventually extend
that lead to 31-0 at half, and 38-0 after the first possession of the
second half. Plain and simple, it was a steamroll. Purdue would go
on to start 5-0 breaking into the top 25 with a chance to knock off
the mighty Ohio State at home in a National TV game with major
title implications. They failed, miserably, and it started a downward
spiral that seems to repeat itself every season under Joe Tiller. Purdue
lost five of its last seven games straight up (including their final
three) and we have no reason to believe they will bring a top notch
effort in this second-tier bowl game against a team they dominated
so thoroughly already this year. Going back to that meeting in week
three, we have to wonder how much stock to put into the result? Central
Michigan lost two offensive line starters and its best pass rusher
to the NFL and its second leading tackler to graduation. This was a
team in early transition that really had nothing to play for before the
MAC season started, knowing full well that a second straight MAC
Championship was the goal all along. Comparing statistics on offense
and defense shows some impressive numbers from both sides? offensive
units. Tiller?s basketball on grass spread attack has been run
rather effectively by Curtis Painter this season leading Purdue to the
37th ranked offense in terms of total yardage. Painter?s touch was
superb through most of the campaign, throwing for 3,300 yards on
62 percent completions with 26 TDs against just nine INTs. Painter?s
numbers, however, and the team?s play became more and more
sloppy down the stretch. He fired three INTs in his final two games
with just two TDs, and Kory Sheets has basically disappeared over
this current seven-game stretch, amassing more than 70 yards just
two times. The Chips will check in with the 22nd ranked total offense
led by sophomore quarterback Dan LeFevour. In just his second season,
LeFevour has cemented himself as the MAC?s best player, hands
down. He has accumulated over 4,300 yards of total offense on his
way to joining Vince Young as the only other quarterback to throw
for more than 3,000 yards and rush for over 1,000 yards in a season.
His 23 TDs through the air were impressive but his 17 on the
ground were eye-popping as he nearly joined the exclusive Tim Tebow
20/20 club. Purdue would get the slight edge in total and scoring
defense, allowing 385 yards and 25 points per game to CMU?s 450
yards and 35 points per game. But on a closer look at teams that run
a similar offense to that of the Chippewas (Indiana, Michigan State,
Minnesota) and you?ll see those numbers increase to nearly 544
yards and 33 points per game. Joe Tiller-led teams have gone just
3-7 in bowl games, 4-6 ATS, a long term losing proposition. By taking
the points with Central Michigan, you?ll get the more motivated
team with home state support and in-season revenge on its mind.
 

GIANTS007

support 81
Forum Member
Oct 11, 2007
4,095
0
0
Location: Location
NORTHCOAST POWERSWEEPS ( 6-0 SO FAR ) -->. 3-0 SIDES/ 3-0 TOTALS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PURDUE (7-5) C MICHIGAN (8-5)
MOTOR CITY BOWL

The Motor City Bowl finally landed a B10 opponent for the 1st time S/?03 as the Boilers dropped their
L/3 gms and 5 of their L/7 after a 5-0 start. This is rematch of a Sept 15th meeting in which the Boilers
won 45-22 after leading 31-0 at the half while compiling 402 yds. PU finished with 586 yds overall despite
5 TO?s including 4 fmbls. CM is 0-14 SU, 3-10-1 ATS vs the Big Ten S/?94 while Purdue is 34-7-1 SU
but 3-5 ATS vs the MAC (2-0 TY). Purdue has gone bowling in 10 of the 11 yrs of Tiller?s tenure (3-6 SU
& 4-5 ATS) with CM being the 1st non-BCS foe. Slow starts have been the norm as Purdue has fallen
behind 95-0 in the L/6 bowls. The Boilers have played 8 gms vs bowl eligible teams (3-5 SU, 4-4 ATS)
being slightly outscored 27.1-26.6 while outgaining those foes 397-388. CM was 1-3 SU and ATS being
outscored 51-25 and outgained 537-427. This is the Boilers? 1st trip to Ford Field where CM is 3-0 SU
and ATS the L/2Y including two MAC Championship games and a 31-14 win over MT in LY?s Motor City
Bowl. CM should have the crowd edge as they expect to sell 15,000 tickets while PU hopes to bring 5,000
fans. PU is 4-1-1 ATS an AF (2-1 TY). The Boilers have their most veteran team yet under Tiller with 9
senior starters and 17 upperclassmen. CM has 9 senior starters and 14 upperclassmen but also the
MAC Freshman of the Year in Antonio Brown. Purdue last played on Nov 17 while CM played Dec 1.
The Boilers started out ?07 on fire winning their first 5 gms (CM, IAA E Ill & 3 tms with losing records) by
25 ppg. QB Painter ?Breesed? through those overmatched foes with an 18-3 ratio. Once PU got to the meat
of their Big Ten schedule reality quickly set in as OSU and Michigan manhandled the Boilers by a combined
71-28 with 3 of PU?s TD?s coming in the L/1:00. PU rebounded to win their next 2 vs Iowa & NW before
stumbling in their L/3. The Boilers had an inconsistent ground game with Sheets having fmbl problems and
Taylor missing 4 gms with a broken arm. The receiving corps had 2 standouts in WR Bryant and TE Keller
(Mackey semis) but 6?4? Lymon suffered a sophomore slump before eventually being kicked off the team.
The OL is large (6?5? 310) and does a good job protecting Painter (23 sks allowed, 4.3%). Boilers are #39 in
our off rankings. PU?s D (#58) returned 9 starters but the undersized front 4 (6?4? 269) struggled vs the run
(149 rush ypg, 4.0 allowed) and failed to generate a strong pass rush (24 sks). The LB?s were solid finishing
as 4 of the team?s top 6 tacklers. Despite inj?s the secondary was greatly improved finishing #32 in our pass
eff D with CB Vinson actually leading the team in tackles, pbu and int. PU had their best ST unit of the Tiller
era finishing #5 with the one of the NCAA?s top KR units (#7) which scored 3 TD led by Bryant.
CM has our #23 offense. Their main weapon is QB LeFevour who is #5 in the NCAA in total offense
as he had over 3,000 yds passing and 1,000 yds rushing joining Vince Young as the only players to
do so. LeFevour attended PU camps in HS but was never offered a scholarship by the Boilers. The
Chippewas also have two RB?s who combined for over 1,000 yds rushing in Hoskins and LY?s leading
rusher Sneed. Their top two WR?s, Brown and Anderson, have combined for 53% of CM?s receptions
and 55% of their receiving yds. The OL avg 6?4? 294 with 3 seniors which has opened holes for 5.0
ypc while allowing just 16 sacks (3.1%). CM has our #112 def allowing 36 ppg with 5 gms over 40 pts
including two over 50 pts. The DL avg 6?3? 264 with 2 seniors allowing 4.1 ypc with 22 sacks led by DE
Zombo, who leads the team in sacks. The top three tacklers are all LB?s led by 2 seniors including Keith,
the MAC?s #2 tackler. The Chippewas? weakest link is the secondary with 4 underclassmen starters as
they have our #110 pass eff D allowing 285 ypg (65%) and a poor 31-16 ratio. CM comes in with our
#91 ranked ST?s unit. Brown was the bright spot of the ST leading the team in KR and PR with 1 TD.
They allowed two return TD?s and 10.4 ypr on punts but just 19.4 on KR.
This matchup gave us a 4H Key Selection winner in the first meeting as Purdue was a 21? point
favorite. The Boilermakers are now a single digit favorite and while CM has the emotional edge and is
thrilled to be here, the disparity in talent will become obvious in the 2H. Purdue will be able to run the
ball against a defense allowing 4.1 ypc and pass the ball against a secondary ranked #110 in our pass
eff defense. Three straight bowl losses and a 24-7 loss to Mayland LY (outgained 429-285) will ensure
that Purdue is ready. There?s also a big edge in coaching with Tiller matching up vs a bowl virgin.

FORECAST: PURDUE 48 Central Michigan 31 RATING: 4★
 

GIANTS007

support 81
Forum Member
Oct 11, 2007
4,095
0
0
Location: Location
WINNING POINTS

MOTOR CITY BOWL
(December 26 at Detroit)
PURDUE over CENTRAL MICHIGAN by 4
OK, so just how does an underdog close this much of a gap after losing 45-22 during
the regular season vs. this particular opponent, trailing 31-0 at halftime? First,
there is obviously an emotional factor that leads to a stronger effort after being
embarrassed, particularly when films of that earlier rout get shown over and over
during pre-game practices. But even more important is that the favorite allows the
game to be much closer because they simply can not find a reason to be excited.
That is the Purdue situation here. Having closed the season with three consecutive
losses, staying on campus into December and then taking a bus ride to Detroit over
the Christmas Holiday is more of a punishment than a reward. No, the Chippewa
defense can not be counted on to make many stops here, after allowing 30 first
downs and 583 yards in the first meeting, although they do have some of the walking
wounded back in the secondary. The key is to get enough production from Dan
LeFevour and the offense, and when you have a QB that just became the second
player in NCAA history to have over 3,000 yards passing and 1,000 rushing in the
same season (Vince Young being the only other), you have a good starting point.
The Chippewas are also confident in this environment, where they have picked up
three decisive wins over the past 12 months, a pair of MAC Championship games,
and LY?s 31-14 bowl romp over Middle Tennessee. More enthusiasm puts them in
the game, lesser talent keeps them from winning outright. PURDUE 38-34.
 
MB NCAAF 728x90 Jpg

GIANTS007

support 81
Forum Member
Oct 11, 2007
4,095
0
0
Location: Location
POINTWISE: 0-6 SO FAR


MOTOR CITY PURDUE 41 - Central Michigan 27 RATING: 5


Motor City Bowl


7-5) vs CENTRAL MICHIGAN (8-5)
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 26
7:30 PM EST -- ESPN TELEVISION
AOPR AVS FDS RUSH PASS TRN EDGE TO:
Purdue ........ 42.4 .. 33-25 .. 24-21 .. 136-151 .. 287-151.. + 4 . Purdue
C Michigan . 36.3 .. 34-36 .. 24-24 .. 186-166 .. 265-285.. + 3 . by 1.2 Pts
ANALYSIS
Did anyone say revenge? Once in a bowl season is a rarity, but this year there
are 2 such setups, with this contest joining that category, as the Boilermakers
of Purdue (-22) pounded the Chippewas of Central Michigan, 45-22 on week
#3 of this season. Purdue led it 38-0, before CM's LeFevour got hot, to narrow
it to 38-22, before the eventual 1-pt Boiler cover. A 223-101 RY edge for PU
in that rout. However, from a 5-0 start, & a Top 25 ranking, the Boilers would
wind up on a 3-game slide, finishing tied for 7th in the Big Ten, along with
Indiana, Michigan St, & Northwestern. Their 33 ppg "O" is led by prolific QB
Painter, who threw for 3,300 yds, 26 TDs (9 INTs), but their "D" has impressed
only sporadically, & they failed to cover in their last 4 away games. The Chips
play on the turf of Ford Field for the 4th time in the past 2 years, & thus far, the
results have been more than satisfactory, with 31-10 & 35-10 wins in the '06 &
'07 MAC Title games, & a 31-14 win over Middle Tennessee in this bowl a year
ago. Talk about your friendly confines. That bowl game, by the way, marked
just their 3rd bowl trip (1st since the '94 Las Vegas). Jones has filled in nicely
as head coach, after '06's head man Brian Kelly bolted for Cincinnati which
losit its head coach to MIchigan St. The Chips are at their best in league play,
as they are 114 pts ahead of the spread in their last 11 MAC games, but have
a 164-90 pt deficit in their 4 non-conference games. LeFevour has been the
quintessential steadying hand at QB, with a spectacular 6,229 PYs & 48 TDs
the past 2 yrs. We would love to give the nod to the Chips, especially on this
field, as such heavy dogs, but we simply can't dismiss that earlier 38-0 deficit.
PROPHECY: Purdue 41 - CENTRAL MICHIGAN 27 RATING: 5
 

GIANTS007

support 81
Forum Member
Oct 11, 2007
4,095
0
0
Location: Location
ACE ACE / ALLEN EASTMEN

(1-5 SO FAR)

Motor City Bowl
$100- Take #402 Purdue Boilermakers -8 over Central Michigan. (Wednesday, December 26, 7:30 pm EST).
 
MB NCAAF 728x90 Jpg

GIANTS007

support 81
Forum Member
Oct 11, 2007
4,095
0
0
Location: Location
DR BOB ( 4-2 SO FAR )

OPINION ONLY:

Purdue (-8 ?) vs Central Michigan: Math favors Purdue by 10 points but situation slightly favors Central Michigan. Tough call, but I?ll lean slightly with Purdue.
 

GIANTS007

support 81
Forum Member
Oct 11, 2007
4,095
0
0
Location: Location
Vegas Hotsheet ( 4-5 SO FAR)

Wednesday, December 26th
MOTOR CITY BOWL - 7:30pm ET ESPN
401 C Michigan 20
402 Purdue 37

PURDUE -8?


FREE PICK: UNDER 71?
 

GIANTS007

support 81
Forum Member
Oct 11, 2007
4,095
0
0
Location: Location
JOHN CAMBELL FROM COVERS: 1-5 SO FAR

Motor City Bowl
Central Michigan vs. Purdue (-9, 72 ?)
Central Michigan?s defense won?t be able to keep this one close.
Pick: Purdue -9
 
MB NCAAF 728x90 Jpg

quanjin

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 20, 2007
168
0
0
Does anyone have John Ryan's 5* bowl game play for tonight?

Does anyone have John Ryan's 5* bowl game play for tonight?

Thanks in advance.
 

Lockloser

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 30, 2005
295
0
0
Arthur Ralph?

Arthur Ralph?

Hope everyone had a great Christmas day.

Arthur Ralph--FREE PLAY --CELTICS-7

He went 2-0 yesterday and may be getting hot again...

Thanks in advance if anyone can post his pay card (Eddie, Giants, etc)

And Giants...I read your post yesterday and know you will post if you get and not hold back....so this is not an open solicitation as much as a "thanks in advance".

PS Giants....thanks for all the great work of late...I know everyone really appreciates it. Cheers!
 
MB NCAAF 728x90 Jpg

peppermillrick

Registered
Forum Member
Drew Gordon

Drew Gordon

Drew Gordon
Wednesday Plays:

1. 400,000♦ Purdue
2. 50,000♦ Pistons
3. 50,000♦ Warriors

1. Purdue- So the Chippewas have some late season success against some pretty average MAC teams, while the Boilermakers falter in their last 3 games against bowl-bound Big Ten teams, and all of a sudden Purdue is a single-digit favorite, even after crushing Central Michigan 45-22 earlier this season? Sometime the guys in Vegas just plain screw up, and this is exactly one of those times.
Let's examine their match up back on September 15th, when the Boilermakers cruised to a 38-0 lead with 12 minutes remaining in the 3rd quarter, only to let the Chippewas score some garbage points late, to end up with our 45-22 shellacking. Guys, what has changed since then? Has the Chippewas defense gotten any better? Has Curtis Painter and this Boilermakers offense gotten any worse? The answer is no and no, as Purdue can and will dominate this match up once again.
The biggest difference between these two schools is defense, plain and simple. While some will argue their numbers are closer than they appear, that's if you don't take into account the level of competition, which clearly makes Purdue the better defense, allowing 24 ppg on the season. Remember guys, Purdue was able to limit dual-threat QB LaFevour to his lowest rushing yardage of the season (10 carries for 26 yards), and they can do it again tonight.
Finally, if you've seen this Chippewas defense play, there's no question Curtis Painter and company will shred them once again. The fact the Boilermakers have RB Jaycen Taylor back and healthy this time around only gives them that much more of an edge in the running game, where Central Michigan allows 165 yards rushing per contest. Once they establish RBs Taylor/Sheets, the passing game will be wide open for Painter and his top threats WR Bryant and TE Keller.
Bottom line, the Boilermakers may not win by as much as their first meeting earlier this season, but make no mistake, Purdue gets the solid win and cover in tonight's Motor City Bowl. With a huge edge on defense, and more than enough offense to manhandle a pathetic Chippewas defense, look for Purdue to open up their second can of whip-ass on this Central Michigan team tonight.
Take Purdue BIG over Central Michigan as your top-rated play of the day.

2. Pistons- New Jersey may have won two straight against a bad Miami team and a Warriors squad that's very beatable on the road, but tonight they take a major step up in competition, as the veteran Pistons come to town. Detroit will be looking to extend their 3 game winning streak SUATS in this series tonight, and based on the Nets pathetic play at home (4-11 ATS), I say they make it 4 in a row!
Biggest problem for New Jersey in this series has been cracking this Pistons defense, as they've averaged 96 ppg against Detroit over their last 3 meetings. The fact the Nets are struggling mightily to score only strengthens my play on the Pistons, as New Jersey can muster only 91 ppg on 43% shooting this season. Injuries (Krstic) and inconsistent play by everyone but Jefferson has doomed this Nets team and will doom them once again tonight.
Pistons are rolling, winners of 5 in a row SUATS, they've limited all 5 opponents to 87 points or less, and that includes high-octane teams like Golden State, Boston, and Memphis. If they can limit those teams offensively, than you better believe they'll have little trouble stopping a sputtering and fragmented Nets offense in this one.
Bottom line, I'm not impressed by the Nets recent wins, and I say they get right back to their struggles against a superior and surging Pistons team tonight. New Jersey has issues once again with this Pistons defense, while the same cannot be said for Billups and company, who'll take care of the business on both ends of the court in this one.
Take the Pistons comfortably over Nets in this NBA match up.

3. Warriors- This is a mismatch if I've ever seen one, as you couldn't pair two more different teams if you tried. Its not all the 'Wolves fault, as injuries have decimated this roster, but that still doesn't excuse the fact that Minnesota is playing as if they don't care, losing ugly game after ugly game.
Take their last road game for example, as they get walloped by New Orleans 110-76... The game was over by halftime, and the 'Wolves effort on both ends of the court was embarrassing to say the least. They allowed the Hornets to shot 53% and forced only 9 turnovers. While offensively, Ryan Gomes was the only player I saw who actually put forth a decent effort.
One thing we know for sure about the Warriors is their offense is outstanding at home, averaging 118 ppg over their last 7 in Oakland. It would be one thing if Minny had any concept of defense, but being that they're allowing 105 ppg over their last 5 games, I have little reason to believe they'll limit Baron Davis and company even in the slightest.
Finally, its also important to consider, this is the first time in over two weeks that the Warriors are playing at home. After a relatively successful road trip, look for the Warriors to really lay it on thick tonight at home, as facing a soft West Coast team after bumping and bruising with the likes of Cleveland and New Jersey is exactly what this offense needs... A chance to run. Note the favorite is 7-2 ATS over the last 9 meetings in this series, and you can make it 8-2 ATS after tonight!
Take the Warriors BIG over the Timberwolves in late NBA action.

:toast:
 

GIANTS007

support 81
Forum Member
Oct 11, 2007
4,095
0
0
Location: Location
ASA Newsletter

Central Michigan(+9) over Purdue
As we?ve stated many times before, picking bowl games is a lot about who wants to be there versus who doesn?t want to be there. That theory applies perfectly to this game. The Boilers were looking for MUCH bigger things this season. They started the year 5-0 and there was talk of winning the Big Ten and a possible Jan. 1 bowl. Since that 5-0 start, Purdue has gone 2-5, barely squeaking into the final bowl spot for the Big Ten, the Motor City Bowl. This team is not at all excited about playing in the lowest bowl slot in the league when it was looking for a sunny, warm location to be making its post-season appearance.

Central Michigan was headed in the opposite direction to close out the season. After losing three of their first four games (including one at Purdue and we?ll get to that in a minute), the Chippewas have won seven of their last nine games. This is an experienced team that won the MAC Championship two straight years and is thrilled to be here. They wanted another shot at Purdue and now they get it. This time the game is on a neutral field rather than in West Lafayette. Take that back, it?s in Detroit, which will make it more of a ?home? game for CMU. They have been talking about redemption ever since being paired with Purdue for this game.

The Boilers beat CMU 45-22 back on Sept. 15. As we stated earlier, the Chippewas were not playing well at that point in the season. They got down 31-0 at halftime and had trouble mustering any offense. At halftime, they made some adjustments and outscored Purdue 22-14 and put up 239 yards passing in the second half. Purdue, on the other hand, had only 65 total yards of offense in half number two.

As the season went along, Central Michigan became very balanced on offense. It ended the season averaging 265 yards passing and 182 yards on the ground. Quarterback Dan LeFevour had his second straight outstanding season throwing for over 3,300 yards and 23 touchdowns. This team should make hay versus a Purdue defense that was shredded by good teams. It allowed 436 yards per game and 32 points per game versus teams going to bowl games. The Boilers went 1-5 versus those teams with their only win coming versus this CMU squad. In fact, that was Purdue?s only win this year over a team with a .500 or better record.

Purdue isn?t thrilled being here in the first place and now it must play a team it already beat this season. No chance they come out fired up for this game. This stays very close with the Chippewas pulling the upset.
 
Top