- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,176
- 356
- 83
- 74
I’m sorry but This seems like an over reaction now. I’m not playing this nonsense but the only play is the under. If they go over than take my money and shame on me for playing it. This isn’t baseball And doing it a disservice.
I agree 24 is to low
I’m sorry but This seems like an over reaction now. I’m not playing this nonsense but the only play is the under. If they go over than take my money and shame on me for playing it. This isn’t baseball And doing it a disservice.
I jumped on over 11 runs when I saw it for 1st 5 this morning, saw a line of -21 1/2 steam down to -19 total runs, yesterday's starters are notorius for getting contact hit against them, with the thinner air and how the line drivers and long fly balls carry, no wonder there were so many runs yesterday, today's no difference except Cobb pitches to contact and is a grounders guy and Darvish can get hit hard if his breaking balls dont bite, my guess is this one goes over 11 quickly and lands on 22 for a final score, 12-10 type game. GL!! 72% on the UNDER!!
I jumped on over 11 runs when I saw it for 1st 5 this morning, saw a line of -21 1/2 steam down to -19 total runs, yesterday's starters are notorius for getting contact hit against them, with the thinner air and how the line drivers and long fly balls carry, no wonder there were so many runs yesterday, today's no difference except Cobb pitches to contact and is a grounders guy and Darvish can get hit hard if his breaking balls dont bite, my guess is this one goes over 11 quickly and lands on 22 for a final score, 12-10 type game. GL!! 72% on the UNDER!!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.