IN GAME THREAD Super Bowl LIII
- Thread starter MadJack
- Start date
I figured the pats.
Under surprises me that people weren't chasing points and expecting the "they are due to start scoring"
I'm still shocked the rams offense was that bad.
Brees and Payton would have beaten them I think.....
Goff and mcvay were just overwhelmed in their youth and their inexperience showed throughout the game with not being able to adjust.
I think the moment was to big which it wouldnt have been for saints
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Under surprises me that people weren't chasing points and expecting the "they are due to start scoring"
I'm still shocked the rams offense was that bad.
Brees and Payton would have beaten them I think.....
Goff and mcvay were just overwhelmed in their youth and their inexperience showed throughout the game with not being able to adjust.
I think the moment was to big which it wouldnt have been for saints
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Early reports are saying the game was pretty much a wash for the books. The money they made was on the props.
My place in Vegas had four wagers at $1 million or more, including one wager on the Rams money-line (+120) for $2 million.
"Overall it was a good day, but nothing great"
No record Super Bowl wagering handle. The GCB announced $145.9 million was wagered in Nevada. The books held $10.7 million for a win percentage of 7.4. The handle was $158.6 million last year and 138.5 two years ago.
