Funny how twitter reveals things. Like, I had Almagro pegged as a cocky mexican-boxer type. Not at all. He's actually pretty mellow. Same with Raonic. I thought he was like an engineering type, real smart. But his mind's on level of inspirational poster. I think he does need a coach. I doubt he can figure out what to do, you could kind of see it in him in loss to Verdasco.
Tennis Picks
- Thread starter TennisTapir
- Start date
Funny how twitter reveals things. Like, I had Almagro pegged as a cocky mexican-boxer type. Not at all. He's actually pretty mellow. Same with Raonic. I thought he was like an engineering type, real smart. But his mind's on level of inspirational poster. I think he does need a coach. I doubt he can figure out what to do, you could kind of see it in him in loss to Verdasco.
[-69.01]
3-parlay
Federer 1.22 (Paire)
Williams 1.06 (Halep) win
Petrova/Srebotnik 1.37 (Hsieh/Peng) loss
2.00/1.26 loss
-69.01 - 2.00 = -71.01 units
3-parlay
Federer 1.22 (Paire)
Williams 1.06 (Halep) win
Petrova/Srebotnik 1.37 (Hsieh/Peng) loss
2.00/1.26 loss
-69.01 - 2.00 = -71.01 units
Last edited:
I hoped for a little more out of the fade, but can't grumble about positive results, no matter how small.
The interesting thing is figuring out the point where you get a higher return betting the fade picks two at a time (in parlays) rather than just straight up. Round robin might be a better way to go, but I have never played that way. Just going to throw it out, I'm interested in any real betting discussion anyone wants to open up.
The interesting thing is figuring out the point where you get a higher return betting the fade picks two at a time (in parlays) rather than just straight up. Round robin might be a better way to go, but I have never played that way. Just going to throw it out, I'm interested in any real betting discussion anyone wants to open up.
Errani 3.6 (Azarenka): 1.00/2.60 loss
Errani +5 (Azarenka) 1.69: 1.00/0.69 loss
-71.01 - 2.00 = -73.01 units
Errani +5 (Azarenka) 1.69: 1.00/0.69 loss
-71.01 - 2.00 = -73.01 units
Last edited:
Federer -4 (Paire) 1.57: 4.00/2.29 loss
semi-follow (bleed), buying half game
-73.01 - 4.00 = -77.01 units
semi-follow (bleed), buying half game
-73.01 - 4.00 = -77.01 units
Last edited:
Kings 2.15 (San Jose): 2.00/2.30 loss
Kings-San Jose 4' under 2.45: 2.00/2.90 win
Salami 9' under 2.1: 2.00/2.20 win
-77.01 + 3.10 = -73.91 units
Kings-San Jose 4' under 2.45: 2.00/2.90 win
Salami 9' under 2.1: 2.00/2.20 win
-77.01 + 3.10 = -73.91 units
Last edited:
Toronto 2.07 (Yankees): 4.00/4.28 loss
ANAHEIM 1.78 (White Sox): 4.00/3.10 win
Houston +1' (Pittsburgh) 2.00: 4.00/4.00 win
Milwaukee +1' (St. Louis) 1.67: 4.00/2.66 win
New York 5 (Indiana) 1.99: 4.00/3.98 loss
TEXAS 2.14 (Detroit): 4.00/4.28 win
SAN DIEGO 2.18 (Washington): 4.00/4.36 win
-73.91 + 10.40 = -63.61 units
ANAHEIM 1.78 (White Sox): 4.00/3.10 win
Houston +1' (Pittsburgh) 2.00: 4.00/4.00 win
Milwaukee +1' (St. Louis) 1.67: 4.00/2.66 win
New York 5 (Indiana) 1.99: 4.00/3.98 loss
TEXAS 2.14 (Detroit): 4.00/4.28 win
SAN DIEGO 2.18 (Washington): 4.00/4.36 win
-73.91 + 10.40 = -63.61 units
Last edited:
Salami 10' under 1.74: 4:00/2.96 win
Rangers-Bruins 5 under 1.73: 4.00/2.92 loss
OTTAWA 2.14 (Pittsburgh): 4.00/4.28 win
OTTAWA +1' (Pittsburgh) 1.37: 4.00/1.48 win
Memphis +3' (San Antonio) 2.08: 4.00/4.32 loss
Detroit 2.16 (Texas): 4.00/4.64 loss
-67.61 - 3.28 = -70.89 units
Rangers-Bruins 5 under 1.73: 4.00/2.92 loss
OTTAWA 2.14 (Pittsburgh): 4.00/4.28 win
OTTAWA +1' (Pittsburgh) 1.37: 4.00/1.48 win
Memphis +3' (San Antonio) 2.08: 4.00/4.32 loss
Detroit 2.16 (Texas): 4.00/4.64 loss
-67.61 - 3.28 = -70.89 units
Last edited:
PROP: Seattle-Cleveland RHE 24 over -115: 2.30/2.00 loss
-70.89 - 2.30 = -72.19 units
-70.89 - 2.30 = -72.19 units
Last edited:
[-67.44]
5-parlay
Stephens 1.357 (Pironkova)
McHale 1.357 (Davis)
Larsson 1.526 (Cetkovska)
De Bakker 1.333 (Cecchinato) loss
Putinseva 1.476 (Vandewege) win
2.00/9.06 loss
-67.44 - 2.00 = -69.44 units
5-parlay
Stephens 1.357 (Pironkova)
McHale 1.357 (Davis)
Larsson 1.526 (Cetkovska)
De Bakker 1.333 (Cecchinato) loss
Putinseva 1.476 (Vandewege) win
2.00/9.06 loss
-67.44 - 2.00 = -69.44 units
Last edited:
Matosevic 2.90 (Haase): 2.00/3.80 loss
Hewitt 3.30 (Andujar) 2.00/4.60 loss
Stephens 1.357 (Pironkova): 4.00/1.43 [added when completed]
Jovanovski +4' (Lepchenko) 1.95: 4.00/3.81 loss
Jovanovski-Lepchenko 20 over 1.91: 4.00/3.64 win
Soler-Bouchard 21 over 1.87: 4.00/3.48 loss
Erakovic 2.78 (Niculescu) 2.00/3.56 loss
Erakovic-Niculescu 20' over 1.87: 4.00/3.48 win
McHale 1.357 (Davis): 4.00/1.43 loss
Larsson 1.526 (Cetkovska): 4.00/2.11 win
De Bakker 1.33 (Cecchinato) 4.00/1.33 loss
Laaksonen 2.80 (Stakhovsky): 2.00/3.60 loss
-69.44 - 14.77 = -84.21 units
Hewitt 3.30 (Andujar) 2.00/4.60 loss
Stephens 1.357 (Pironkova): 4.00/1.43 [added when completed]
Jovanovski +4' (Lepchenko) 1.95: 4.00/3.81 loss
Jovanovski-Lepchenko 20 over 1.91: 4.00/3.64 win
Soler-Bouchard 21 over 1.87: 4.00/3.48 loss
Erakovic 2.78 (Niculescu) 2.00/3.56 loss
Erakovic-Niculescu 20' over 1.87: 4.00/3.48 win
McHale 1.357 (Davis): 4.00/1.43 loss
Larsson 1.526 (Cetkovska): 4.00/2.11 win
De Bakker 1.33 (Cecchinato) 4.00/1.33 loss
Laaksonen 2.80 (Stakhovsky): 2.00/3.60 loss
-69.44 - 14.77 = -84.21 units
Last edited:
CoCo Vandeweghe @CoCoVandey 8m
Her exact words were "You are a terrible player only serve. I win all the rallies" that comment is totally uncalled for...
CoCo Vandeweghe @CoCoVandey 8m
...How can anyone comment on my game style after you have already won the match in such a negative way is unbelievable!...
CoCo Vandeweghe @CoCoVandey 8m
I have never played a person with worst sportsmanship... Putintseva...
Her exact words were "You are a terrible player only serve. I win all the rallies" that comment is totally uncalled for...
CoCo Vandeweghe @CoCoVandey 8m
...How can anyone comment on my game style after you have already won the match in such a negative way is unbelievable!...
CoCo Vandeweghe @CoCoVandey 8m
I have never played a person with worst sportsmanship... Putintseva...
DETROIT +126 (Chicago): 2.00/2.52 win
COLORADO -101 (Arizona): 4.04/4.00 loss
San Diego +129 (St. Louis): 4.00/5.16 win
-88.21 + 1.16 = -87.05 units
COLORADO -101 (Arizona): 4.04/4.00 loss
San Diego +129 (St. Louis): 4.00/5.16 win
-88.21 + 1.16 = -87.05 units
Last edited:
- Dec 31, 2006
- 2,937
- 12
- 0
I'll be rooting for Det. as well, I took a wth parlay with them and the LA Kings to both win their series.
