The Computer says...........
- Thread starter RobertBIrish
- Start date
Well I will tell you what I wish I would have had this thing last year I ran all of the numbers with closing lines and here is how it did on Sides and Totals last year and thought I would add it had over in last years superbowl but had the Giants LOL.
Sides 137-89-8
Totals 45-29-2
Combined 182-118-10
I am not running any further back LOL it is giving me a headache with all of the numbers.
[This message has been edited by RobertBIrish (edited 10-30-2001).]
Sides 137-89-8
Totals 45-29-2
Combined 182-118-10
I am not running any further back LOL it is giving me a headache with all of the numbers.
[This message has been edited by RobertBIrish (edited 10-30-2001).]
I think most of us would take a $ 5K profit for the football season(based on 100 bets).
Thanks Robert, I paid $ 150.00 for winpicks software a couple of years back and it sucked. If you decide to market this program, my $$$ is on the way. People should be paid for their time.
Thanks again
Thanks Robert, I paid $ 150.00 for winpicks software a couple of years back and it sucked. If you decide to market this program, my $$$ is on the way. People should be paid for their time.
Thanks again
RobertBIrish just wanted to say thanks again . Just got home from COLLECTING from my bookie. CHA-CHING Thanks boilermaker
RobertBIrish, you must have found away to include emotion. In the past so many computer system/programs just could not measure emotion. With the record you show going back last year. The record you show for all of this year. I believe with out that tool you could not average what you are. In fact if it was my system. I would force my self to go back one more year. I always felt better if I checked three years.
I had good reson for that. Twice in by 36 years of working at this. I came up with some great number as you have here. Then the third year or that year it self numbers fell way down in to 52 to 54% range. So everytime I thought I had the final tool to pound these guys. I always check three years. As I said for good reason. Took long time and hard work to arrive at something to keep above 55% year after year. But your numbers are impressive. I hope they hold for you.
I had good reson for that. Twice in by 36 years of working at this. I came up with some great number as you have here. Then the third year or that year it self numbers fell way down in to 52 to 54% range. So everytime I thought I had the final tool to pound these guys. I always check three years. As I said for good reason. Took long time and hard work to arrive at something to keep above 55% year after year. But your numbers are impressive. I hope they hold for you.
If the formulas are based on averages, or previous week boxscore data, I have about 10 years worth if you want someone to program and test old data. Understand the sensitivity of working with such a method though, so I'll leave it up to you. Can also get the data to you if you have interest in back testing yourself.
