That is the most ridiculously presumptive editorial I've seen to date.
Several falsehoods presented as factors. Michael Brown was not a suspect in any robbery as the "robbery" this dolt uses the video for was never ever ever reported. Nor was a description of him ever released.
He refers to the Alton Sterling murder as an altercation between officers and states that he, Alton Sterling went for a weapon during the altercation, however there is absolutely zero physical evidence of that in the videos and several eyewitness reports contradicting that very same action which is being alleged by the police that shot him. Police are human too, they lie as well.
Philando Castile, he says police were on "high alert" due to a robbery. Not true, another embellishment of the facts by the ridiculously biased Crowder. The robbery and subsequent BOLO happened three days prior. Police receive several of these daily so being on high alert us again an embellishment used to sway the listener.
He uses a ridiculous clip from maniac cop or some shit to further distort the facts.
He equates a man being shot without reason to an officer being fired from his job.
Here's the deal, some of society is more than willing to accept things as fact if those "facts" are in keeping with their line of thought. However, facts are concrete and cannot be presumed or assumed true based only on police accounts and that is what always happens. The "facts" lie in the numbers. While some may see the death of a black man as deserved once the police that are responsible for his death purposely release his arrest record in order to sway public opinion against the deceased, most fail to recognize that those records and the identities of the victims are generally unknown to the potential murderers prior to their murder. (See how easy it is to change a word in order to seek a desired reaction).
Maybe you can tell me why the Ferguson police department was completely disbanded by the justice department due to rampant racist practices? Or why officer Wilson was allowed to leave the scene of a shooting in which he was the sole suspect, go to a police fraternity and shower, change clothes and then return to the scene and be the only officer to check in any and all evidence from the scene? Why was there no DNA from Michael Brown found anywhere near, or on killer Wilson's weapon, hand or holster if they fought over the weapon when Wilson stated that he "felt his fingers crawling around and over his trying to pull the trigger". Why does Wilson say he was in fear for his life yet when Brown flees after being shot, leaving Wilson in the safety of his squad car, he doesn't call for back up, radio that shots were fired, instead pursues Brown continuing to shoot. Why was Browns body 153' from the open door of the squad car yet Wilson's account that Brown was charging him accepted as factual?
Yeah, I'd say your boy crowder is incredibly misinformed and biased.
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
