Hi Ghost
I got the judges' round-by-round scores this morning (Monday).
Judge Ged O'Connor gave Cintron rounds 2, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 10.
Judge Peter Trematerra had Cintron winning rounds 1, 2, 5, 6, 9 and 10.
Judge Tommy Kaczmarek had Cintron winning the second, ninth and 10th.
I gave Cintron rounds 2, 6, 9 and 10.
O'Connor and Trematerra basically saw the same fight (and saw it wrongly). If O'Connor had not blown the fourth round by giving it to Cintron (O'Connor was on his own in that round), then Martinez would have won the fight -- on a too-close decision, but still a win.
One totally blown round by one judge in a 12-round fight is sometimes all it takes between a fighter getting a win or having to settle for a draw, or, worse yet, actually losing the fight.
Really appreciate you posting this info Graham. I personally gave Cintron rounds 2, 6, and 10. I can see your reasoning for giving him round 9.
I can MAYBE (begrudgingly) give Cintron round 1.
But giving him 4 AND 5 to me is ridiculous. Giving Cintron every (and I MEAN EVERY) benefit of the doubt, I still only come up with 5 rounds. He still loses 7 to 5.
It would be IMPOSSIBLE for me to score this fight a draw. And it should have been impossible for the two blind mice, O'Connor and Trematerra.
Regardless, 95% of the articles I have read have called this a robbery. It was clear, to most ringside press, that the person controlling the action, dictating the pace, and imposing himself most effectively = Sergio Martinez.
The judging, although horrible, was not the worst part of the match. The break that Cintron got in between the "KO" and the start of the 8th round was THE WORST. Totally took away any advantage the opponent had earned.
Was it a pretty fight to watch - hell no.
Was there a clear and definitive winner - yes.
Unfortunately he was not rewarded appropriately.
On to Pavlik, Cotto, Gamboa, Duddy, and all the other fights this weekend.
Cheers.