I LOVE WR said:
First paragraph- http://www.mushbox.com/
Second paragraph- Compare this to your posts.
Third paragraph- BUT I ALSO DONT RANT AND RAVE FROM MY AISS LIKE SOME HAVE ABOVE YOU INCLUDED.
THIS IS A DISGRACE TO THE THE JUSTICE SYSTEM
- Thread starter vyrus858
- Start date
- Status
First paragraph- http://www.mushbox.com/
Second paragraph- Compare this to your posts.
Third paragraph- BUT I ALSO DONT RANT AND RAVE FROM MY AISS LIKE SOME HAVE ABOVE YOU INCLUDED.
If I'm not mistaken, isn't a post about this case when it first happened what initially brought Eddie Haskell to the board?
WR, I am quite sure that 225 of those pounds is asshole. That being said I will be in
Toronto this summer and I would relish the thought of meeting you and all your friends for dinner and an old fashioned ass beating....................so dinner for two then? You me and all your buddies right!
Also where did you read the transcripts? I can send you a copy of mine if you like. Maybe you can show me where it says that her depression was caused by his insults. Hell maybe if I hurl some at you .............you'll drown yourself. Let me make something very clear to you ........YOU ARE A LIAR.
a bold faced LIAR and a joke of a capper. I will be happy to provide you with my address and my phone number if April isn't soon enough for me to kick the hell out of a piss ant such as yourself. Anyone that would make the statements you made in the defense of a person that MURDERED innocent children does not deserve to be on this board IMO.
Didn't plan it you fuhking idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!
If you read the transcripts LIAR than you surely would have seen the interview in which she stated " I tried to do this once a few months ago, but Rusty was home. I filled the tub but Mary was getting to loud and I had to stop". Mary, dickhead, was the youngest, but of course you knew that LIAR because you read the transcripts right. Tell me something LIAR, where and when was that interview, how old where the children and in what order did she kill them............its all in the transcripts LIAR. I am quite confident that you will not answer this in a timely manner as you never read them at all did you LIAR. You know what, sell stupid somewhere else. As far as my ranting goes, when the death of innocent children is involved I will always rant, unless of course it was you at which time I would dance a jig. As far as you kickin my ass....I will tell you what If it is your estimation that I am one of the high school boys you diddle at recess you are wrong. I have an opportunity for you............I will be on the Paula Zahn show on CNN I believe Tuesday. Not quite sure when it will air as the interview was today, try to watch it and you can call in and impress her with your amazing wit, intelligence, which is of course clearly evident in your grammar and spelling, and tell her what a dolt I am. In the mean time fatso stick to something you actually read about.........might I suggest "Clifford the Big Red Dog". LIAR
Toronto this summer and I would relish the thought of meeting you and all your friends for dinner and an old fashioned ass beating....................so dinner for two then? You me and all your buddies right!
Also where did you read the transcripts? I can send you a copy of mine if you like. Maybe you can show me where it says that her depression was caused by his insults. Hell maybe if I hurl some at you .............you'll drown yourself. Let me make something very clear to you ........YOU ARE A LIAR.
a bold faced LIAR and a joke of a capper. I will be happy to provide you with my address and my phone number if April isn't soon enough for me to kick the hell out of a piss ant such as yourself. Anyone that would make the statements you made in the defense of a person that MURDERED innocent children does not deserve to be on this board IMO.
Didn't plan it you fuhking idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!
If you read the transcripts LIAR than you surely would have seen the interview in which she stated " I tried to do this once a few months ago, but Rusty was home. I filled the tub but Mary was getting to loud and I had to stop". Mary, dickhead, was the youngest, but of course you knew that LIAR because you read the transcripts right. Tell me something LIAR, where and when was that interview, how old where the children and in what order did she kill them............its all in the transcripts LIAR. I am quite confident that you will not answer this in a timely manner as you never read them at all did you LIAR. You know what, sell stupid somewhere else. As far as my ranting goes, when the death of innocent children is involved I will always rant, unless of course it was you at which time I would dance a jig. As far as you kickin my ass....I will tell you what If it is your estimation that I am one of the high school boys you diddle at recess you are wrong. I have an opportunity for you............I will be on the Paula Zahn show on CNN I believe Tuesday. Not quite sure when it will air as the interview was today, try to watch it and you can call in and impress her with your amazing wit, intelligence, which is of course clearly evident in your grammar and spelling, and tell her what a dolt I am. In the mean time fatso stick to something you actually read about.........might I suggest "Clifford the Big Red Dog". LIAR
by the way she held no press conferences you idiot, she did one interview at which point the judge entered a gag order on all media interviews with her. "I read the transcripts" what a friggin LIAR. "Courts don't overturn unless a major mistake is made". What book of stupidity did you get that from. "Tidbits of misinformation for Idiots". As a matter of fact LIAR why don't you post the website of the transcript you read as I am sure the judge didn't mail you one and tell me exactly where they, the defense, make the claim of abuse. Her husband adamantly defended her and continues to. So do us all a favor and post that site very soon OK. I am sure you will won't you because we know that you wouldn't talk out of your incredibly expanded ass.
So we here will all wait with baited breath for the "buffet capper" to post this now infamous transcript.
So we here will all wait with baited breath for the "buffet capper" to post this now infamous transcript.
i think they should make her get married and impregnated by Scott Peterson, then go on a cruise.
bjfinste said:
Good point bj. It was this case or Susan Smith-who drowned her kids in a lake via her car and blamed it on Black kidnappers.
fatdaddycool said:That being said I will be in
Toronto this summer/QUOTE]
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
you better be here pal!
happy new year!
Judge orders drug addict to stop having children
Judge orders drug addict to stop having children
ROCHESTER, New York (AP) -- A Family Court judge who last year stirred debate about parental responsibilities ordered a second drug-addicted woman to have no more children until she proves she can look after the seven she already has.
The 31-year-old mother, identified in court papers only as Judgette W., lost custody of her children, ranging in age from eight months to 12 years, in child-neglect hearings dating back to 2000. Six are in foster care at state expense and one lives with an aunt.
The youngest child and two others tested positive for cocaine at birth and all seven "were removed from her care and custody because she could not and did not take care of them," Judge Marilyn O'Connor said in a December 22 decision made public Tuesday.
"Because every child born deserves a mother and a father, or at the very least a mother or a father, this court is once again taking this unusual step of ordering this biological mother to conceive no more children until she reclaims her children from foster care or other caretakers," O'Connor wrote.
In a similar ruling last March, O'Connor ordered a drug-addicted, homeless mother of four to refrain from bearing children until she won back care of her children. The decision, the first of its kind in New York, is being appealed.
Wisconsin and Ohio have upheld similar rulings involving "deadbeat dads" who failed to pay child support. But in other states, judges have turned back attempts to interfere with a person's right to procreate.
O'Connor said she was not forcing contraception or sterilization on the mother, who had children with seven different men, nor requiring her to get an abortion should she become pregnant. But she warned that the woman could be jailed for contempt if she has another child.
The New York Civil Liberties Union maintained that the opinion cannot be enforced because it "tramples on a fundamental right -- the right to procreate."
"There is no question the circumstances of this case are deeply troubling," said the group's executive director, Donna Lieberman. "But ordering a woman under threat of jail not to have any more babies ... puts the court squarely in the bedroom. And that's no place for the government."
Judge orders drug addict to stop having children
ROCHESTER, New York (AP) -- A Family Court judge who last year stirred debate about parental responsibilities ordered a second drug-addicted woman to have no more children until she proves she can look after the seven she already has.
The 31-year-old mother, identified in court papers only as Judgette W., lost custody of her children, ranging in age from eight months to 12 years, in child-neglect hearings dating back to 2000. Six are in foster care at state expense and one lives with an aunt.
The youngest child and two others tested positive for cocaine at birth and all seven "were removed from her care and custody because she could not and did not take care of them," Judge Marilyn O'Connor said in a December 22 decision made public Tuesday.
"Because every child born deserves a mother and a father, or at the very least a mother or a father, this court is once again taking this unusual step of ordering this biological mother to conceive no more children until she reclaims her children from foster care or other caretakers," O'Connor wrote.
In a similar ruling last March, O'Connor ordered a drug-addicted, homeless mother of four to refrain from bearing children until she won back care of her children. The decision, the first of its kind in New York, is being appealed.
Wisconsin and Ohio have upheld similar rulings involving "deadbeat dads" who failed to pay child support. But in other states, judges have turned back attempts to interfere with a person's right to procreate.
O'Connor said she was not forcing contraception or sterilization on the mother, who had children with seven different men, nor requiring her to get an abortion should she become pregnant. But she warned that the woman could be jailed for contempt if she has another child.
The New York Civil Liberties Union maintained that the opinion cannot be enforced because it "tramples on a fundamental right -- the right to procreate."
"There is no question the circumstances of this case are deeply troubling," said the group's executive director, Donna Lieberman. "But ordering a woman under threat of jail not to have any more babies ... puts the court squarely in the bedroom. And that's no place for the government."
Chanman said:
Yeah, it could've been Smith, too. I just remember that someone (65 maybe?) made a post about how she, whichever woman it was, should be put into a wood chipper. And it started from there. Both cases were equally distrubing.
Well, after a little detective work, I figured out that it was actually FDC who recommended the wood chipper. But this was the thread I was thinking of.
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?t=36100&
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?t=36100&
Kdad, excellent post. This piece of shit should fry for what she did. I hope Her attorney has nightmares for pulling this shit, you know he's not getting paid!!! Legal system iS A FREAKING JOKE.
bjfinste said:
At least I am consistent.............
And happy New Year to you and all Anthony and I will be there. I will be the one stomping a mudhole in WR's ass....................LOL
Yeah, BJ it was Andrea Yates and then I think the discourse drifted to Susan Smith. I think I got into it with YYZ, Bluemound Freak, Felonious Monk amongst others. Nearly three years and almost two thousand posts later I find some things don't change.
Idiots like Bluemound Freak and Felonious Monk have been replaced (admirably so) by another generation of equally innane, moronic, psychotic and downright stupid individuals who go by the name of Vyrus aka Count de Montevideo, Mjolnir and Saint. Of course my friend from Toronto remains.
My fingers have blisters from repeatedly trying to provide some sense, reason and intellect to the modern day barbaric hordes led by the republican party whose members dominate this board so I will not repeat such arguments here as they fall upon deaf ears.
The only point I will make is that this argument boils down to the issue of whether or not you are in favor of the death penalty for the insane. Of course our conservative lynch mob led by Bush and company want to string em up. People with brains know better.
Eddie
Idiots like Bluemound Freak and Felonious Monk have been replaced (admirably so) by another generation of equally innane, moronic, psychotic and downright stupid individuals who go by the name of Vyrus aka Count de Montevideo, Mjolnir and Saint. Of course my friend from Toronto remains.
My fingers have blisters from repeatedly trying to provide some sense, reason and intellect to the modern day barbaric hordes led by the republican party whose members dominate this board so I will not repeat such arguments here as they fall upon deaf ears.
The only point I will make is that this argument boils down to the issue of whether or not you are in favor of the death penalty for the insane. Of course our conservative lynch mob led by Bush and company want to string em up. People with brains know better.
Eddie
bj, I just went back and looked at that old thread. Quite interesting. Eddie, is that you posting as I LOVE WR?
- Status
