This is too low... Even for Cheney
- Thread starter Clem D
- Start date
HE'S A F'N LOSER AND HALF THE US WANTS HIM AS VICE PRES AGAIN. WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU ABOUT THE US. OH MY STOMACH :142lmao:
no, it is too dangerous to vote for John Kerry and that lying scheister John Edwards who for all we know will use litigation for national defense
i wholeheatedly agree
i wholeheatedly agree
How is John Edwards a liar? Cheney has a whole lot of integrity right? Bush's integrity is laughable too.
Remember this. Like it or not 9/11 happened on their watch. Bush/Cheney were never interested in Alqaeda, until they got smacked in the face with Osama's cock. They have also failed to keep their promise That Osama Could not Run And could not hide.
Wanted dead or alive rings a bell.
They always say stay the course. Well they didn't. When they had a hard time chasing Osama in Tora Bora, they Quit and went to Iraq.
Ofcourse that was the plan all along anyway.
Remember this. Like it or not 9/11 happened on their watch. Bush/Cheney were never interested in Alqaeda, until they got smacked in the face with Osama's cock. They have also failed to keep their promise That Osama Could not Run And could not hide.
Wanted dead or alive rings a bell.
They always say stay the course. Well they didn't. When they had a hard time chasing Osama in Tora Bora, they Quit and went to Iraq.
Ofcourse that was the plan all along anyway.
its amazing how unreasonable some people are in how they fail to understand how foreign and economic policy have effects.
"It happened under Bush's watch" fully illustrates this lack of any kind of reasoning ability and absolutely demonstrates where your line of thinking comes from: mere talking points and nothing else
FYI, John Edwards believes and deceives juries that cerebral palsy is somehow the fault of experienced physicians. Despite what science says. He also does not believe that inexperienced physicians can cause cerebral palsy because they have not made enough to sue yet. Only those who have made a long and successful career serving the people are candidates to be sued because they have the money.
John Edwards, lying scoundrel for Veep.
"It happened under Bush's watch" fully illustrates this lack of any kind of reasoning ability and absolutely demonstrates where your line of thinking comes from: mere talking points and nothing else
FYI, John Edwards believes and deceives juries that cerebral palsy is somehow the fault of experienced physicians. Despite what science says. He also does not believe that inexperienced physicians can cause cerebral palsy because they have not made enough to sue yet. Only those who have made a long and successful career serving the people are candidates to be sued because they have the money.
John Edwards, lying scoundrel for Veep.
its amazing how unreasonable some people are in how they fail to understand how foreign and economic policy have effects.
"It happened under Bush's watch" fully illustrates this lack of any kind of reasoning ability and absolutely demonstrates where your line of thinking comes from: mere talking points and nothing else
Pretty much the same as the neocons who blamed 9/11 on Clinton. So it's talking points if it comes from the left..and logic from the rightt?
"It happened under Bush's watch" fully illustrates this lack of any kind of reasoning ability and absolutely demonstrates where your line of thinking comes from: mere talking points and nothing else
Pretty much the same as the neocons who blamed 9/11 on Clinton. So it's talking points if it comes from the left..and logic from the rightt?
no because Clinton's and Bush 41's foreign policies were weak on terror........
nothing was done about Bin Ladin during 8 years of terror while Clinton was around....Clinton's best foreign policy achievement was having the Chinese were sleeping in the Lincoln bedroom
the CIA and FBI were in shambles and granted Bush hadn't got around to doing much about it but he was only 8 months in and 8 months isn't quite 8 years
nothing was done about Bin Ladin during 8 years of terror while Clinton was around....Clinton's best foreign policy achievement was having the Chinese were sleeping in the Lincoln bedroom
the CIA and FBI were in shambles and granted Bush hadn't got around to doing much about it but he was only 8 months in and 8 months isn't quite 8 years
And Bush's is pissing off the entire world. Creating terrorists faster than we can kill them. Don't worry freeze you will get your wish of 4 more years Im afraid.
Just finished lisening to remarks of Cheney that Gore and Edwards and the minions have interpreted as such.
Clem Why don't you post his remarks and see if anyone else interprets it that way--yea I know you probably have not even heard the remarks.
His point was if terrorists attack do you want someone that wages war on attackers or writes it off as just an attack and does nothing.
Next time post the fact and let folks decide not interpretions and opinions from trial attorneys and politicians.
Clem Why don't you post his remarks and see if anyone else interprets it that way--yea I know you probably have not even heard the remarks.
His point was if terrorists attack do you want someone that wages war on attackers or writes it off as just an attack and does nothing.
Next time post the fact and let folks decide not interpretions and opinions from trial attorneys and politicians.
FREEZIE IS A PROVEN CLOWN- JUST IGNORE HIS SPINNING FACTS TO FAVOUR THE REPUBLICANS. HE'S A JOKE. AS DUMB AS A POST- AND NOT ONE OF THE NEW SHINY ONES 
PEOPLE GET VERY DEFENSIVE WHEN FACTS ARE THROWN AT THEM.
ITS NOT HIS FAULT THAT BUSH IS THE BEST THE REPUCS COULD COME UP WITH. ALL THE SMART NON COWARDS WERE BUSY. LOL
WHERES EDDIE HASKELL WHEN U NEED HIM?
CANADA CANADA :canada1
PEOPLE GET VERY DEFENSIVE WHEN FACTS ARE THROWN AT THEM.
ITS NOT HIS FAULT THAT BUSH IS THE BEST THE REPUCS COULD COME UP WITH. ALL THE SMART NON COWARDS WERE BUSY. LOL
WHERES EDDIE HASKELL WHEN U NEED HIM?
CANADA CANADA :canada1
NO DOGS THATS NOT WHAT HE SAID.
IM NOT A DEMOCRAT OR THANK GOD A REPUBLICAN.
STOP BEING FOOLISH ABOUT IMPORTANT ISSUES. TAKE YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR AIISSS :moon:
DONT SPIN HIS ACTUAL WORDS. THE GUYS A PATHETIC HUMAN AND THATS JUST BASED ON WHAT WE KNOW OF HIM.
YOU LOSE :142lmao:
IM NOT A DEMOCRAT OR THANK GOD A REPUBLICAN.
STOP BEING FOOLISH ABOUT IMPORTANT ISSUES. TAKE YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR AIISSS :moon:
DONT SPIN HIS ACTUAL WORDS. THE GUYS A PATHETIC HUMAN AND THATS JUST BASED ON WHAT WE KNOW OF HIM.
YOU LOSE :142lmao:
Vice President Cheney was not campaigning Wednesday, but his suggestion a day earlier that electing John Kerry would risk a "devastating" terrorist attack kept agitating the political arena.
Democrats denounced Cheney's statement as part of a "fear strategy" and sought to capitalize on it to attack President Bush and raise money. Republicans interpreted the remark to try to make it sound less partisan.
Cheney said Tuesday in Des Moines that if voters make the "wrong choice" Nov. 2, "the danger is that we'll get hit again, and we'll be hit in a way that will be devastating from the standpoint of the United States."
Under a Kerry presidency, the nation could "fall back into a pre-9/11 mind-set" of viewing terrorist attacks as "just criminal acts" and the nation as "not really at war," Cheney said.
Some political analysts said Cheney went over the top in election-year rhetoric but was on established historical ground in doing so. These observers cited "vote for us or the other guy will get you killed" precedents
Sorry i thought everyone heard it as it was on all day yesterday.
Democrats denounced Cheney's statement as part of a "fear strategy" and sought to capitalize on it to attack President Bush and raise money. Republicans interpreted the remark to try to make it sound less partisan.
Cheney said Tuesday in Des Moines that if voters make the "wrong choice" Nov. 2, "the danger is that we'll get hit again, and we'll be hit in a way that will be devastating from the standpoint of the United States."
Under a Kerry presidency, the nation could "fall back into a pre-9/11 mind-set" of viewing terrorist attacks as "just criminal acts" and the nation as "not really at war," Cheney said.
Some political analysts said Cheney went over the top in election-year rhetoric but was on established historical ground in doing so. These observers cited "vote for us or the other guy will get you killed" precedents
Sorry i thought everyone heard it as it was on all day yesterday.
I'll see if I can find it Clem and see how you interpret it.Just saw it myself a while ago and I didn't remotely come to that conclusion.
I love wr
I know you didn't see footage I saw because Fox is banned in Canada which is main reason your perception is so limited.You see what they want you to see.
After we post the comments in question have your mother read it to you slowly and report back
I love wr
I know you didn't see footage I saw because Fox is banned in Canada which is main reason your perception is so limited.You see what they want you to see.
After we post the comments in question have your mother read it to you slowly and report back
I know you didn't see footage I saw because Fox is banned in Canada
FOX IS NOT BANNED ANYWHERE IN CANADA. AND MY MOTHER IS DEAD BUT YOU DIDNT KNOW THAT.
I LISTENED AND READ HIS EXACT QUOTE AS A HUMAN BEING. NOT A BIASED REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT. CHENEY REALLY IS AS STUPID AS HE APPEARS.
BUT HE KNOWS ALOT OF AMERICANS ARENT VERY BRIGHT AND DONT REMEMBER FACTS IN THE PAST. AS A BETTING MAN I SAY THE STATES WILL GET HIT BEFORE THE ELECTION AGAIN.
AND I WILL WIN ALL MY KERRY BETS.
FOX IS NOT BANNED ANYWHERE IN CANADA. AND MY MOTHER IS DEAD BUT YOU DIDNT KNOW THAT.
I LISTENED AND READ HIS EXACT QUOTE AS A HUMAN BEING. NOT A BIASED REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT. CHENEY REALLY IS AS STUPID AS HE APPEARS.
BUT HE KNOWS ALOT OF AMERICANS ARENT VERY BRIGHT AND DONT REMEMBER FACTS IN THE PAST. AS A BETTING MAN I SAY THE STATES WILL GET HIT BEFORE THE ELECTION AGAIN.
AND I WILL WIN ALL MY KERRY BETS.
lmao we are pissing off who?
i guess we shouldnt fight back or we will piss people off....
thats a great stance on national security
Here is my stance: we kill you before you kill us...thats my stance to the terrorists....
and if your government doesnt help us, we will kill your government
draw a line in the sand and say enough is enough....that is the Bush doctrine....
who cares if it pisses people off
i guess we shouldnt fight back or we will piss people off....
thats a great stance on national security
Here is my stance: we kill you before you kill us...thats my stance to the terrorists....
and if your government doesnt help us, we will kill your government
draw a line in the sand and say enough is enough....that is the Bush doctrine....
who cares if it pisses people off
Interesting we will be attacked if Kerry is elected. Cheney you dumb chit who was president on 9/11 and VP. You and the other draft dodger.
Here is my stance: we kill you before you kill us...thats my stance to the terrorists....
and if your government doesnt help us, we will kill your government
draw a line in the sand and say enough is enough....that is the Bush doctrine....
who cares if it pisses people off
I ACTUALLY AGREE WITH YOU FOR ONCE. BUT DONT THINK THIS MEANS WE'RE BUDDIES. UNTIL YOU SMARTEN UP IM LOOKING DOWN ON YOU. YOU'RE STILL A PUTZ
and if your government doesnt help us, we will kill your government
draw a line in the sand and say enough is enough....that is the Bush doctrine....
who cares if it pisses people off
I ACTUALLY AGREE WITH YOU FOR ONCE. BUT DONT THINK THIS MEANS WE'RE BUDDIES. UNTIL YOU SMARTEN UP IM LOOKING DOWN ON YOU. YOU'RE STILL A PUTZ
"FOX IS NOT BANNED ANYWHERE IN CANADA"
http://myspinzone.randomdrivel.com/displayarticle444.html
http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/TorontoSun/News/2004/04/26/436740.html
Still trying to find complete transcript of Cheney comments,have found a lot of cut up ones alla Micheal Mooore methods of posting fragments to suggest something different---however I couldn't have been too far off on my interpretation of his comments as even the extremely left LA Times came to same conclusion I did.
Here is most complete quote I can find in print so farfrom Washington Post but still chopped somewhat alla Micheal Moore
"It's absolutely essential that eight weeks from today, on November 2nd, we make the right choice, because if we make the wrong choice then the danger is that we'll get hit again," the vice president said, "that we'll be hit in a way that will be devastating from the standpoint of the United States, and that we'll fall back into the pre-9/11 mind-set, if you will, that in fact these terrorist attacks are just criminal acts and that we are not really at war."
http://myspinzone.randomdrivel.com/displayarticle444.html
http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/TorontoSun/News/2004/04/26/436740.html
Still trying to find complete transcript of Cheney comments,have found a lot of cut up ones alla Micheal Mooore methods of posting fragments to suggest something different---however I couldn't have been too far off on my interpretation of his comments as even the extremely left LA Times came to same conclusion I did.
Here is most complete quote I can find in print so farfrom Washington Post but still chopped somewhat alla Micheal Moore
"It's absolutely essential that eight weeks from today, on November 2nd, we make the right choice, because if we make the wrong choice then the danger is that we'll get hit again," the vice president said, "that we'll be hit in a way that will be devastating from the standpoint of the United States, and that we'll fall back into the pre-9/11 mind-set, if you will, that in fact these terrorist attacks are just criminal acts and that we are not really at war."
