I never make a boxing wager based on someone elses opinion, but when I read or hear valid points from others I definitly take it into consideration.
Read this last night...the guy makes a good arguement, but he doesn't realize that 5dimes opened Tony as the favorite and the line has moved...
Toney-Peters: Easy Money?
John Chavez - 8/25/2006
Photo Credit Showtime
What is it with the odds-makers making Samuel Peters a slight favorite over James Toney? Currently at 5dimes.com they have Peters at -160. While this doesn't make Peters a heavy favorite in any way shape or form, it does in fact point to the fact that the bookies think Peters has the edge in the scrap next Saturday. I've been racking my brain for a couple weeks now since I've been studying past fights of both guys trying to make an accurate prediction of how their fight will go down. It has come to my attention that Sam Peters has a tendency to push his jab later on in his fights negating it's effectiveness as a range finder and point scorer. I've also noticed that throughout history, punchers are only comfortable when they are hitting something. They don't like to consistently miss wildly, they'd rather hit arms, gloves, or the body than be off balance from throwing poorly placed power shots. What happens when they miss their initial bombs is that they back off from throwing them with as much emphasis. This in turn changes the fight from puncher vs. boxer to boxer vs. boxer. Sam Peters is not a boxer and doesn't have comparable experience or skill to that James Toney has. This is why it perplexes me as to why odds-makers would make Peters even a slight favorite. If I were to be making the odds for this fight I would have Toney as a solid 2 to 1 favorite.
Evander Holyfield, no matter how shot or past his prime he is, throws textbook boxing punches. Everything he throws is short, straight, and accurate. Not only that but he does get rough in the trenches using his head incessantly to butt and setup his shots. James had a field day with Holyfied when they fought back in 2003. Peters while being strong doesn't even have the inside game of Holyfied. I suppose that the bookies are counting on James coming in out of shape as he seemingly did against Hasim Rahman. The problem is that James weighed only a couple pounds heavier in the Rahman fight than he did against Dominic Guinn were he looked pretty good. He stated that he had the flu and he fought like he had the flu. While I don't think or would even want James to come into this fight at 220, I predict that he'll be in very good fighting shape regardless of his weight as long as he comes in healthy. James has the better jab, footwork, defense, and accurate punching than Peters. Power is such an overrated asset especially when you can't land it. We've heard it time and time again that Toney has never fought a puncher like this.
When are people going to realize that James is a true heavyweight and he is by far the most skilled guy in the division. Right now the odds on Toney at 5dimes.com are +125. I'm interested to see the props on this fight because I really like James by decision in this fight. I'm guessing we'll see James by decision at around +200 and that is a great value bet. I pick Toney to come out jabbing and using distance and his superior footwork, while looking to counter with his right hand. I also see Peters trying to come out jabbing and letting his right hand go trying to hurt James. It looks like it will turn into an inside fight in which Toney will have a field day with his short crisp punches. The only thing James has to be careful of is the murderous rabbit punches that Peters throws. I've never seen more blatant rabbit punching by a big heavyweight and the ref should be cognizant of this. James will outbox Peters from both the inside and outside to a dominant decision victory.