The biggest problem with the ruling is that
the court did NOT view walking as an integral part of the game. Therfore, not making any "fundamental" changes to the game itself.
The only way they could have come to this conclusion is to have drawn on their own experiences instead of the professionals who play the game for a living. You can be damn sure that every one of those justices has a custom cart at home, so in their view a cart is probably more customary, and part of the game.
Plus the angle of attack in this case using the Americans with Disabilities Act, focused on equal opportinity, not equal competition. That way they cover their butts politically addressing equal access for all.
I guess they figuered making the tour would be hard enough, and someone with a disability, Like Casey, would only be an abberation, not effecting the overall makeup of the sport. Even though, I think this is an opening of Pandora's box.
MOV
the court did NOT view walking as an integral part of the game. Therfore, not making any "fundamental" changes to the game itself.
The only way they could have come to this conclusion is to have drawn on their own experiences instead of the professionals who play the game for a living. You can be damn sure that every one of those justices has a custom cart at home, so in their view a cart is probably more customary, and part of the game.
Plus the angle of attack in this case using the Americans with Disabilities Act, focused on equal opportinity, not equal competition. That way they cover their butts politically addressing equal access for all.
I guess they figuered making the tour would be hard enough, and someone with a disability, Like Casey, would only be an abberation, not effecting the overall makeup of the sport. Even though, I think this is an opening of Pandora's box.
MOV