Tito wins round 1 on two judges scorecards and losses round 2 on two judges scorecards. :shrug: :shrug:
http://mmaaddicts.com/dann/john/ortiz-griffin-2-card-1.jpg
I'm baffled. Whe I read Dana's write-up on MMAJunkie, I was even more confused. I thought it was clear cut that Tito won Rd 2, Griffin won Rd 3. I thought Rd1 was subjective. I didn't think Rd2 + 3 were even close??? :shrug:
http://mmajunkie.com/news/16961/dan...-106-judging-says-reform-out-of-his-hands.mma
I have a solution. Scrap the whole fucking round by round scoring. It allows way to many loop holes and it allows fighters to beat the system. I thought Tito basically beat the system last night. Win round 1,2 and dont get 10-8 in round 3...
Anyways, just judge the fight as a hole. Who cares about the score? You got 3 judges, they pick who they thought won the fight. IMO, the only real reason to have rounds is just so there's a structure.
that`s pride`s scoring system....i agree,it might be better.....you could have a guy lay on another fighter for 10 minutes and do little damage......while his opponent comes back late and brutalizes the guy for the last 5 minutes cutting him up and inflicting damage....
mma is different than boxing in that it`s scoring is so much more diverse...striking(hands,feet and knees),grappling and submission attempts...
round by round makes sense for boxing...with more limited staright forward ways of scoring points....
in mma,i think you have to look at the whole....rx r doesn`t get it,imo...
but then again,how do you score the fouls?.....personally,i think we need more warnings for fouls unless they`re absolutely and obviously flagrant.....
as far as grabbing the fence,one warning and then you go on your back and restarted on the second offense...
we`ve seen fights turn(marquardt vs whatsisname) on point deductions...that shouldn`t happen unless it physically hampers or incapacitates a fighter...
I believe that was Thales Leites.
And illegal blows can be purse deductions.
Just ask Hatsu Hioki what he thinks of judging in Japan.
Judging the whole fight or judging round by round makes no difference, the problem lies with MMA judges not knowing how to judge.
Or......JUST FINISH THE FIGHT.......and don't worry about the judges.
I don't understand how all these people are getting upset about the Tito loss. He didn't win the fight. I thought it was pretty obvious.
I can live with subjectively selecting Forrest as the winner. However, the judge who went 30-27 should get his licence revoked.
Well I am not so sure about that now.
I thought the judges that gave Griffin the win was gonna be because they gave Griffin round 1, but two judges saw round 2 for Griffin.
The 30-27 was not as bad since another judge gave round 2 to Griffin as well.
MY QUESTION IS THIS:
How do you give Tito round 1 but not round 2 as one judge did???? He clearly had a better 2nd than 1st.
2009 record 26-16 +25.79
Lil Nog -130 2 units
I really like Nog here, I think he has more ways to win it than Cane does.
I don't want to risk too much though, the 5 units I lose on Shogun is still hurting. The minute this fight is over I'm putting in a very large play on KenFlo. I'm really suprised the line with he and the ape man is so low. I don't see any chance of Florian losing to Guida, of course the UFC judges could want to bend me over one more time before the year is over.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.