UFC Fight Night 19: Sep 16th, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

crow

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 3, 2008
773
0
0
Bet365 doesn't allow Europeans who win either..:142smilie
 

weepaul

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 28, 2007
2,261
2
0
kickserv got ass raped by an elephant cock tonight, a big fat elephant cock


Funny thing is it was almost a great night for me, boy did I get fucked tonight:mj07:




weepaul is going to bash me now:mj07:
No Chance my Madjack Brother!!

I don't take pleasure in one of our own suffering.

Especially when there is future suffering to come at the hands of Dos Santos getting his head booted into the cheap seats!!! :D ;)
 

Ghost Kid

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 23, 2008
14,004
3
0
GW...I am beginning to think they announced the wrong winner in the ring. Every site I have seen scored it for Cantwell.....
:shrug:

here is mmaweekly's take:

Brian Stann vs. Steve Cantwell
R1 - Both fighters are rushed to the cage to keep up with the TV schedule and start trading strikes in classic fashion... as expected. Both fighters land hard with Cantwell being just a bit crisper and pressing forward the entire round. 10-9 Cantwell

R2 - A carbon copy of round one. There seems to be no sense of urgency by Stann as Cantwell again outpoints him on the feet.

R3 - Round three is just like the previous one. Cantwell stalks and Stann searches for a hole in Cantwell?s defense. Cantwell controls the entire 15 minutes yet loses a curious decision. Again the crowd is unhappy.

Brian Stann def. Steve Cantwell by Unanimous Decision (30-27, 30-27, 29-28), R3
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,573
226
63
"the bunker"
GW...I am beginning to think they announced the wrong winner in the ring. Every site I have seen scored it for Cantwell.....
:shrug:

here is mmaweekly's take:

Brian Stann vs. Steve Cantwell
R1 - Both fighters are rushed to the cage to keep up with the TV schedule and start trading strikes in classic fashion... as expected. Both fighters land hard with Cantwell being just a bit crisper and pressing forward the entire round. 10-9 Cantwell

R2 - A carbon copy of round one. There seems to be no sense of urgency by Stann as Cantwell again outpoints him on the feet.

R3 - Round three is just like the previous one. Cantwell stalks and Stann searches for a hole in Cantwell?s defense. Cantwell controls the entire 15 minutes yet loses a curious decision. Again the crowd is unhappy.

Brian Stann def. Steve Cantwell by Unanimous Decision (30-27, 30-27, 29-28), R3

yeah,i`m seeing mostly the same stuff,g.k.......that`s why i`m curious about cantwell`s reaction to the verdict.....

it won`t change my account balance,but,i`m beginning to question my sanity when it involves contact sports wagering....

i could understand cantwell getting caught...but,i`m still shaking my head over stann winning a decision(30-27 on two cards)....while,from most reports,running for the majority of the fight...

just can`t picture stann as the better technician...:shrug:

very abxious to see a replay...
 

Ghost Kid

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 23, 2008
14,004
3
0
In boxing it happens all too much....the wrong winner is announced in the ring

Unfortunately, I have never seen it happen in the cage....but I have mentioned before that I don't like it when the UFC is in a hurry to make the TV start time

a lot of times the fighters in the final prelim get rushed to the ring. And many times in this last slot before TV, the cards are not announced

still doesn't explain how Cantwell lost this fight. My parlay was already belly up will Larson losing. But I did have Cantwell in one future with Mayweather, etc.

30-27 Stann makes ZERO sense by most accounts.
:shrug:
 

Ghost Kid

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 23, 2008
14,004
3
0
OK GW
I watched it
Terrible decision
I scored it 2 to 1 Cantwell, giving Stann the benefit of the doubt in the 2nd
but Stann was doing the Derrick Gainer all night
1 punch, run away
1 punch, run away
Cantwell, on my card, clearly took rounds 1 and 3
but the problem is round 2 was close
and in a short fight
this is the type of shit that happens
30-27 Stann is despicable
Stann did NOTHING in the 3rd....absolutely nothing
His corner told he he was winning, and he ran around the entire third round
Cantwell was disgusted afterwards and didn't want to shake hands
DAMN DAMN DAMN I hate losing a bet like this
utter bullshit
I am pissed !
 

Ghost Kid

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 23, 2008
14,004
3
0
If I was Dana White I would cut Stann and keep Cantwell after that watching that fight

That's not a victory to be proud of....hell, I don't even think that was a victory.....
 

Ghost Kid

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 23, 2008
14,004
3
0
more opinions:

"cantwell won easily on aggression alone. 30-27 was laughable considering cantwell outlanded stann like 20:1 in the third round. horrible decision, clear favoritism for the american war "hero""

"I think Cantwell got screwed. All Stann did was throw a couple strikes and then get the hell away and repeat. I thought the judges were supposed to score for striking, octagon control and aggression? Here is what the judges watch for in a fight.

-Clean Strikes (could go either way in all honesty)
-Effective Grappling (doesn't really apply but Cantwell stuffed 2 takedowns to 1 for Stann)
-Octagon Control (Easily Cantwell)
-Effective Aggressiveness (Easily Cantwell) "


:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top