UK Free speech eroding

Revolutionary Intentions

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2024
397
83
28
Several cases discussed in this video. As with anything, it starts small and grows. The term, for you MENSA liberals at Mad Jackie’s sports, is incrementalism. Think of the trans hysteria the United States today with biological men playing women’s sports, and allowed in women’s restrooms. none of this would’ve happened 20 years ago, and would’ve been widely panned by the masses. But “Progressive” ideologues push until the odd becomes normalized. What started in the UK, is already being discussed here by Pelosi and Hillary among other liberal “elites”. And, when you have government determining which side’s opinion is correct, and which one is misinformation, that’s when we run into the problems that concern me.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
41,342
1,306
113
On the course!
It still is widely panned by the masses. In fact, I don't know of anyone who approves of men in women's sports. I'm betting no one in here does.

Oh, and you might want to look up who Renée Richards is.
 

Revolutionary Intentions

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2024
397
83
28
It still is widely panned by the masses. In fact, I don't know of anyone who approves of men in women's sports. I'm betting no one in here does.

Oh, and you might want to look up who Renée Richards is.
I heard about him on a podcast. He was Martina Navratilova’s mentor. Go figure lol

You know damn well what I’m talking about with incrementalism. 10 years ago, it would’ve been frowned upon by most liberals to expose children to “gender affirming care”. Now, in certain states, children are being targeted. Hell, one of our friends locally is dealing with this lunacy. his sister-in-law called Christmas Eve year before last to inform them that they’re still coming to Christmas dinner, but just wanted to give them a heads up that their son is now a girl. No surgery yet, but 10-year-old kid showed up with a girls name/ pronouns, and wearing girls clothes two hours later. Our buddy and his wife had to talk to their kids about it in advance. The two teenagers were like yeah whatever, but what do you think the nine-year-old who’s first cousin and close friend is now a girl was thinking? and the biggest loser here outside of the boy who now dresses like a girl it’s his father. Dave allowed his hyper liberal wife to run the show until it was too late. And now he’s kicking himself for letting this happen.

The twisted liberals are all about it. Your Canadian boy I guarantee you is all into it.

And quite honestly, you want to convert yourself into a chick then knock yourself out, but leave the kids alone
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
41,342
1,306
113
On the course!
I heard about him on a podcast. He was Martina Navratilova’s mentor. Go figure lol

You know damn well what I’m talking about with incrementalism. 10 years ago, it would’ve been frowned upon by most liberals to expose children to “gender affirming care”. Now, in certain states, children are being targeted. Hell, one of our friends locally is dealing with this lunacy. his sister-in-law called Christmas Eve year before last to inform them that they’re still coming to Christmas dinner, but just wanted to give them a heads up that their son is now a girl. No surgery yet, but 10-year-old kid showed up with a girls name/ pronouns, and wearing girls clothes two hours later. Our buddy and his wife had to talk to their kids about it in advance. The two teenagers were like yeah whatever, but what do you think the nine-year-old who’s first cousin and close friend is now a girl was thinking? and the biggest loser here outside of the boy who now dresses like a girl it’s his father. Dave allowed his hyper liberal wife to run the show until it was too late. And now he’s kicking himself for letting this happen.

The twisted liberals are all about it. Your Canadian boy I guarantee you is all into it.

And quite honestly, you want to convert yourself into a chick then knock yourself out, but leave the kids alone
Again.....it's STILL frowned upon by "most liberals".

I'll go a little more and say, "almost all".
 

Smitty

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2005
6,478
1,288
113
Upstate NY
just curious... who exactly is "targeting the children"? in which states? how exactly are they being "targeted"? you just saying stupid shit like this, and it's REALLY hard to take you seriously. please, for once, back this up with some evidence. some examples.

just because the dems think people should be able to choose their pronouns, doesn't mean anybody is being "targeted." you're making it sound like nancy pelosi is going door-to-door and making boys dress like girls.

see, here's the problem, and prepare to be shocked. i almost completely agree with you on this. i can't begin to describe how idiotic this all is. a boy is a boy, and a girl is a girl. and a few special people in kick's favorite movies are both. i feel like with children, who by their nature like to find out where their boundaries are, will do whatever they feel they can get away with. if they know they can piss off a parent by acting like the opposite gender, they're probably gonna do it.

that said, unlike you, i acknowledge i could actually be wrong. i'm not an expert on the subject. i can't get in the head of one of these people. so maybe, just maybe, at least some of them REALLY truly think they are the opposite gender. i don't get it. i think it's fucked up. but i could be wrong.

so here's what the liberals are guilty of... accepting these people as who they say they are. do i think they go too far? yup. but if you're going to err in one direction or the other, erring on the side of being too tolerant seems like the right way to go.

i will say... those of you on the right absolutely do not help. acting like the sky is falling and democrats are "targeting kids" and forcing them into the opposite gender is asinine.

as far as males playing in female sports... i said this here a little while ago, so i'll try to keep it brief. my opinion is that, of course, males have no business competing against females. but it doesn't impact me one bit. i think it should be left up to the females who are competing. if they don't feel comfortable competing against a biological male, then they shouldn't have to. they should be the ones making the decision, not me. and not you.

the hysteria from the right just makes the left dig in even deeper.
 

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
May 26, 2002
89,433
1,264
113
50
Canada
just curious... who exactly is "targeting the children"? in which states? how exactly are they being "targeted"? you just saying stupid shit like this, and it's REALLY hard to take you seriously. please, for once, back this up with some evidence. some examples.

Not the first time he has posted stupid shit.

And good luck with the "back it up with evidence" part.
 

Revolutionary Intentions

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2024
397
83
28
Again.....it's STILL frowned upon by "most liberals".

I'll go a little more and say, "almost all".
Well, if it’s so frowned upon, why is it being pushed. I literally watched a video of Kamala saying all inmates will get gender affirming care. You watched the same video.
 

Revolutionary Intentions

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2024
397
83
28
Cie is a great example of what happens when you get all your "news" from Twitter's algorithm.
just curious... who exactly is "targeting the children"? in which states? how exactly are they being "targeted"? you just saying stupid shit like this, and it's REALLY hard to take you seriously. please, for once, back this up with some evidence. some examples.

just because the dems think people should be able to choose their pronouns, doesn't mean anybody is being "targeted." you're making it sound like nancy pelosi is going door-to-door and making boys dress like girls.

see, here's the problem, and prepare to be shocked. i almost completely agree with you on this. i can't begin to describe how idiotic this all is. a boy is a boy, and a girl is a girl. and a few special people in kick's favorite movies are both. i feel like with children, who by their nature like to find out where their boundaries are, will do whatever they feel they can get away with. if they know they can piss off a parent by acting like the opposite gender, they're probably gonna do it.

that said, unlike you, i acknowledge i could actually be wrong. i'm not an expert on the subject. i can't get in the head of one of these people. so maybe, just maybe, at least some of them REALLY truly think they are the opposite gender. i don't get it. i think it's fucked up. but i could be wrong.

so here's what the liberals are guilty of... accepting these people as who they say they are. do i think they go too far? yup. but if you're going to err in one direction or the other, erring on the side of being too tolerant seems like the right way to go.

i will say... those of you on the right absolutely do not help. acting like the sky is falling and democrats are "targeting kids" and forcing them into the opposite gender is asinine.

as far as males playing in female sports... i said this here a little while ago, so i'll try to keep it brief. my opinion is that, of course, males have no business competing against females. but it doesn't impact me one bit. i think it should be left up to the females who are competing. if they don't feel comfortable competing against a biological male, then they shouldn't have to. they should be the ones making the decision, not me. and not you.

the hysteria from the right just makes the left dig in even deeper.
I am dumb and low IQ, you don’t take me seriously to begin with. I appreciate that you’re so fascinated with me. I look forward to gloating after your candidate loses the election then going on about my life outside of this insane asylum
 

Revolutionary Intentions

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2024
397
83
28
just curious... who exactly is "targeting the children"? in which states? how exactly are they being "targeted"? you just saying stupid shit like this, and it's REALLY hard to take you seriously. please, for once, back this up with some evidence. some examples.

just because the dems think people should be able to choose their pronouns, doesn't mean anybody is being "targeted." you're making it sound like nancy pelosi is going door-to-door and making boys dress like girls.

see, here's the problem, and prepare to be shocked. i almost completely agree with you on this. i can't begin to describe how idiotic this all is. a boy is a boy, and a girl is a girl. and a few special people in kick's favorite movies are both. i feel like with children, who by their nature like to find out where their boundaries are, will do whatever they feel they can get away with. if they know they can piss off a parent by acting like the opposite gender, they're probably gonna do it.

that said, unlike you, i acknowledge i could actually be wrong. i'm not an expert on the subject. i can't get in the head of one of these people. so maybe, just maybe, at least some of them REALLY truly think they are the opposite gender. i don't get it. i think it's fucked up. but i could be wrong.

so here's what the liberals are guilty of... accepting these people as who they say they are. do i think they go too far? yup. but if you're going to err in one direction or the other, erring on the side of being too tolerant seems like the right way to go.

i will say... those of you on the right absolutely do not help. acting like the sky is falling and democrats are "targeting kids" and forcing them into the opposite gender is asinine.

as far as males playing in female sports... i said this here a little while ago, so i'll try to keep it brief. my opinion is that, of course, males have no business competing against females. but it doesn't impact me one bit. i think it should be left up to the females who are competing. if they don't feel comfortable competing against a biological male, then they shouldn't have to. they should be the ones making the decision, not me. and not you.

the hysteria from the right just makes the left dig in even deeper.
California is, of course, ground zero, in the United States, but I’m sure Massachusetts and others are right there with you.


I assume you approve of the source, no?
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
41,342
1,306
113
On the course!
I am dumb and low IQ, you don’t take me seriously to begin with. I appreciate that you’re so fascinated with me. I look forward to gloating after your candidate loses the election then going on about my life outside of this insane asylum

You had a life outside this insane asylum. Jack gave you your freedom. You must not enjoy it that much since you crawled back, checked in under an assumed name, and dove right back in for three squares a day. And why? Because it's who you really are, aside from all the pretentiousness, walking around in your white robe and slippers, Cheswick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smitty and kickserv

Revolutionary Intentions

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2024
397
83
28
You had a life outside this insane asylum. Jack gave you your freedom. You must not enjoy it that much since you crawled back, checked in under an assumed name, and dove right back in for three squares a day. And why? Because it's who you really are, aside from all the pretentiousness, walking around in your white robe and slippers, Cheswick.
yes, Jack banned me because I made fun of you, but I assure you i meant nothing by whatever I was saying at the time. Really no il l feelings towards you at all. Yes, I realize you do have some ill feelings towards me,, but that’s not how I operate. I’m sure you’re not the only person in the world that I’m cool with, who isn’t fond of me. Who cares lol.

The reality is I stopped back in to check out the poli forum for the election. At that time, I was under the impression Kamala was going to win. I knew I’d take some lumps, but that doesn’t phase me. I’m glad the tide has turned over the course of the last three or so weeks and my team now has a shot .

I don’t know why you think I’m a fancy robe and slipper guy. Ask Mad Jackie, I’m not fancy at all. Unlike you, I’m not retired early so off to make a buck now. But, now that you mention it, a robe and slippers might be a good first purchase when I do retire on July 24, 2032 .
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top