Who will be going with PEDRO @ -300+ ??

superbook

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 26, 2001
2,868
0
0
Saratoga Springs, NY
Excellent posts guy, this kind of stuff is what makes MJs #1.

Maybe I'm throwing my money away but after reading Nolan's post and re-checking my own numbers (I have Boston winning 5-4), I put a 1/2 unit play on:

Baltimore +1.5 (+160)

gl guys
 

nighthorse

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 26, 2001
1,783
0
0
56
wichita, ks 67209
Nolan Dalla said:
Re: The total

I usually love situations like this -- where one dominant pitcher looks to shut out the opponents, thus requiring the home team to manufacture 7 or more runs to bust the total. Fenway has surpringly been producing a number of low scoring games this year (an abberation in my view -- this is still a hitter's park). For this reason, I rarely like to go UNDER in Boston unless the total us 9 or higher. I forgot the total on this game (I"m guessing 7.5 to 8). Trouble with going UNDER is the Baltimore starter has been fried in a coupel of starts and it's conceivable the Red Sox could tee off in this game.
-- Nolan Dalla

On too many occasions, Pedro has failed to get run support. Why this happens, I don't know......it must drive Pedro crazy trying to figure it out himself. Another reason to think about the under.

(-360)........that's getting a bit steep.
 
Last edited:

THE HITMAN

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 18, 2001
2,899
3
0
HOLLYWOOD, FL
Ummmmmmmm.......Not me, not this time. My books have it not less than -340. Even so (@-310), this is whack ! Pray for rain = Nobody loses. THE HITMAN
 

Big_Mack

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 27, 2001
654
0
0
50
Alabama
HEY !!!! CONGRATS to all of us who took the Bo Sox with the man on the hill...

:toast: :toast: :toast:

I won't play many -300 FAVS during the year but Pedro vs. the O's is money ... Hope some of you got in on it..

:spotting: :Yep: :clap:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top